New and Better Images for Transformers Cyber Battalion 7 inch line

That megatron could have had potential if it wasnt for the stupid cannon arm. They should make him in G2 colors. Starscream has potential for a million repaints.

Rated X wrote:That megatron could have had potential if it wasnt for the stupid cannon arm. They should make him in G2 colors. Starscream has potential for a million repaints.

If only Starscream had knees.

Rated X wrote:That megatron could have had potential if it wasnt for the stupid cannon arm. They should make him in G2 colors. Starscream has potential for a million repaints.

What cannon arm, did you read the news post? The cannon is detachable.

Sabrblade wrote:

Rated X wrote:That megatron could have had potential if it wasnt for the stupid cannon arm. They should make him in G2 colors. Starscream has potential for a million repaints.

If only Starscream had knees.

At least Grimlock and Megatron seem to have some.

I don't really care for this lot... Except for Starscream. I can't have enough of the guy!

I just hope he can wear his null-rays the proper way. If not, meh, I have a drill.

william-james88 wrote:

Sabrblade wrote:

Rated X wrote:That megatron could have had potential if it wasnt for the stupid cannon arm. They should make him in G2 colors. Starscream has potential for a million repaints.

If only Starscream had knees.

At least Grimlock and Megatron seem to have some.

I can see joints on Starscream's knees as well. Again, if he is largely based on his Legends figure, he will have knees.

MrBlack wrote:

william-james88 wrote:

Sabrblade wrote:

Rated X wrote:That megatron could have had potential if it wasnt for the stupid cannon arm. They should make him in G2 colors. Starscream has potential for a million repaints.

If only Starscream had knees.

At least Grimlock and Megatron seem to have some.

I can see joints on Starscream's knees as well. Again, if he is largely based on his Legends figure, he will have knees.

The right paint can do wonders for making single pieces of plastic seem made up of two.

Ok, I really like that Starscream.. And he looks like he has knees. I wonder if the Megatron can peg the gun on one of the pegs on the right arm?

-Kanrabat- wrote:I don't really care for this lot... Except for Starscream. I can't have enough of the guy!

I just hope he can wear his null-rays the proper way. If not, meh, I have a drill.

If you look at the very top of his shoulders you can see where his guns can be pegged in.

JelZe GoldRabbit wrote:

MrBlack wrote:

william-james88 wrote:

Sabrblade wrote:

Rated X wrote:That megatron could have had potential if it wasnt for the stupid cannon arm. They should make him in G2 colors. Starscream has potential for a million repaints.

If only Starscream had knees.

At least Grimlock and Megatron seem to have some.

I can see joints on Starscream's knees as well. Again, if he is largely based on his Legends figure, he will have knees.

The right paint can do wonders for making single pieces of plastic seem made up of two.

It's based on the Legends figure, but not so slavishly that everything matches perfectly. The feet don't turn into thrusters and his wings are now jointed, probably so they'll fit in the box (perhaps removable). If 11" Prime and Bee don't have knees then they have little reason to add knees when they aren't part of the transformation. They seem to be content with well articulated shoulders and hips.

Plus:



Clearly no knees.

Emerje

No knees? What is this, the 80's?

To bad Megs has a pouty face.

Zeek99g wrote:Too bad Megs has a pouty face.

Too many defeats can affect someone's mood.

Y'know, I don't mind these simplified transformations and upsizing or downsizing when they're done right and some of these are done right. What bothers me, immensely I might add, is that their articulation is severely limited on some things.

All of them could use pivots and ball joints everywhere. Wrist swivels, heads, knees, hips, ANKLES, I don't think it's too much to ask for those things and I can't imagine they add any difficulty to these molds. I just can't.

I hate it when they pull crap like this. Starscream actually looks like something I'd buy, I really do like him quite a bit, but the lack of something as simple as ankle pivots drives me insane.

Autobot032 wrote:Y'know, I don't mind these simplified transformations and upsizing or downsizing when they're done right and some of these are done right. What bothers me, immensely I might add, is that their articulation is severely limited on some things.

All of them could use pivots and ball joints everywhere. Wrist swivels, heads, knees, hips, ANKLES, I don't think it's too much to ask for those things and I can't imagine they add any difficulty to these molds. I just can't.

I hate it when they pull crap like this. Starscream actually looks like something I'd buy, I really do like him quite a bit, but the lack of something as simple as ankle pivots drives me insane.

Tsk tsk tsk. Sure, the lack of some articulations is a bummer for a lots of us. But you seem to miss the point of this line. SIMPLIFICATION. Too much articulations mean automatically a more complicated transformation. Most kids and adults that are just entering into the world of Transformers would have no clue where to start. So it's a great way to introduce the classic designs to beginners.

Never forget that before doing algebra one must first learn that 1+1=2.

-Kanrabat- wrote:

Autobot032 wrote:Y'know, I don't mind these simplified transformations and upsizing or downsizing when they're done right and some of these are done right. What bothers me, immensely I might add, is that their articulation is severely limited on some things.

All of them could use pivots and ball joints everywhere. Wrist swivels, heads, knees, hips, ANKLES, I don't think it's too much to ask for those things and I can't imagine they add any difficulty to these molds. I just can't.

I hate it when they pull crap like this. Starscream actually looks like something I'd buy, I really do like him quite a bit, but the lack of something as simple as ankle pivots drives me insane.

Tsk tsk tsk. Sure, the lack of some articulations is a bummer for a lots of us. But you seem to miss the point of this line. SIMPLIFICATION. Too much articulations mean automatically a more complicated transformation. Most kids and adults that are just entering into the world of Transformers would have no clue where to start. So it's a great way to introduce the classic designs to beginners.

Never forget that before doing algebra one must first learn that 1+1=2.

Well, I'm certainly offended. Thanks for talking down to me, which wasn't necessary. Why, exactly, do you assume someone is stupid and needs it explained? Why am I not allowed to have my opinion without people like you crapping all over it?

I missed nothing, including the point of this line. An ankle pivot would add an extra step to Starscream's transformation? Really? A side to side pivot? A wrist that swivels?

In the future, think before you post something like this. It's offensive and unnecessary. Don't do it again.

-Kanrabat- wrote:Tsk tsk tsk. Sure, the lack of some articulations is a bummer for a lots of us. But you seem to miss the point of this line. SIMPLIFICATION. Too much articulations mean automatically a more complicated transformation. Most kids and adults that are just entering into the world of Transformers would have no clue where to start. So it's a great way to introduce the classic designs to beginners.

Never forget that before doing algebra one must first learn that 1+1=2.

They could easily add ball joints and thus some articulation without making it complicated. The only "complications" ball joints add is younger kids may have a bit of a harder time lining things up. When you're five years old, most times you just want to be able to transform them quickly and easily.

Think Starscream should have received bending knees instead of Grimlock or Megatron. As Hasbro will get the most profits out of starscream with all his seekers repaints.

only one i am on the fence about is bb

Burn wrote:

-Kanrabat- wrote:Tsk tsk tsk. Sure, the lack of some articulations is a bummer for a lots of us. But you seem to miss the point of this line. SIMPLIFICATION. Too much articulations mean automatically a more complicated transformation. Most kids and adults that are just entering into the world of Transformers would have no clue where to start. So it's a great way to introduce the classic designs to beginners.

Never forget that before doing algebra one must first learn that 1+1=2.

They could easily add ball joints and thus some articulation without making it complicated. The only "complications" ball joints add is younger kids may have a bit of a harder time lining things up. When you're five years old, most times you just want to be able to transform them quickly and easily.

Exactly. Sadly, just the basic step of lining things up is enough to make many people give up, thus giving up on the TF line altogether. This line will never cancel the most advanced lines like Generations and such. So, having very simplified CLASSIC designs to bring in new fans is a great thing.

I have an example close to home. One of my co-worker bought a TF for is then 4yo son at the DOTM time. He bought DOTM voyager Optimus Prime. Even with the instructions, he never could figure how to transform the damn thing and "just wanted to smash the thing on a wall". Remember that DOTM Voyager OP is piss-easy compared to Voyager HFTD Battle Blades OP. As expected, the toy was soon forgotten in the dephts of the toybin. Did he ever bought a TF for his son again? No. So, that's one less fan for the future. If at the time, there were entry levels TF that looked awesome but were simplified enough like the one-steps and this line, they would have been able to enjoy Transformers and would have bought more. After a few simplified TFs, they would have moved on to more complicated and sophisticated TFs.

I noticed something missing from TF packagings of the latest lines starting with AoE. WHERE THE HELL IS THE DIFFICULTY RATING? They should bring it back like so:
1-Basic
2-Easy
3-Intermediate
4-Hard
5-Expert
This would help parents and newbies a lot.

-Kanrabat- wrote:

Autobot032 wrote:Y'know, I don't mind these simplified transformations and upsizing or downsizing when they're done right and some of these are done right. What bothers me, immensely I might add, is that their articulation is severely limited on some things.

All of them could use pivots and ball joints everywhere. Wrist swivels, heads, knees, hips, ANKLES, I don't think it's too much to ask for those things and I can't imagine they add any difficulty to these molds. I just can't.

I hate it when they pull crap like this. Starscream actually looks like something I'd buy, I really do like him quite a bit, but the lack of something as simple as ankle pivots drives me insane.

Tsk tsk tsk. Sure, the lack of some articulations is a bummer for a lots of us. But you seem to miss the point of this line. SIMPLIFICATION. Too much articulations mean automatically a more complicated transformation. Most kids and adults that are just entering into the world of Transformers would have no clue where to start. So it's a great way to introduce the classic designs to beginners.

Never forget that before doing algebra one must first learn that 1+1=2.

Actually, the first Transformers figure I got was a really complicated figure. I think it was Animated Bee, his transformation to vehicle mode was impossible! Then again, I was 8 so......

Ball joints aren't always wonderful as has been mentioned. It makes transformation needlessly difficult more often than not. Here's my thing. If a car sprang to life in front of you would you stop and count POA, or run away screaming like a little girl?

-Kanrabat- wrote:
I noticed something missing from TF packagings of the latest lines starting with AoE. WHERE THE HELL IS THE DIFFICULTY RATING? They should bring it back like so:
1-Basic
2-Easy
3-Intermediate
4-Hard
5-Expert
This would help parents and newbies a lot.

Thats because they changed that for the amount of steps which is more technical and gives a better idea of what's involved.

My first TFs were G2 Dreadwing, BW terrasor, BW Cheetor and BW Cybershark. All very easy for me as a kid but with great articulation.

Optimum Supreme wrote:No knees? What is this, the 80's?

Given who's in the lineup, I'd have to say yes.

Seriously, I've gotta say it again: If this meant to be a simplified line that's easier for kids, why is it all G1? Does little Timmy generally watch cartoons over three times his age?

Nemesis Primal wrote:

Optimum Supreme wrote:No knees? What is this, the 80's?

Given who's in the lineup, I'd have to say yes.

Seriously, I've gotta say it again: If this meant to be a simplified line that's easier for kids, why is it all G1? Does little Timmy generally watch cartoons over three times his age?

Firstly, I LOVE that Zing on top.

And secondly, while the Starscream and Megatron in these sets are from a time kids may not be aware of (Even I have no clue what Megatron that is supposed to be), Grimlock, Bumblebee and Optimus are kinda huge right now. And they are using alt modes that are in line with modern interpretations of these characters in toys, TV and film, especially the 11 inch optimus, 7 inch bumblebee and Grimlock's color scheme. I really wouldnt call that bumblebee G1.

bumblebeej8 wrote:

-Kanrabat- wrote:

Autobot032 wrote:Y'know, I don't mind these simplified transformations and upsizing or downsizing when they're done right and some of these are done right. What bothers me, immensely I might add, is that their articulation is severely limited on some things.

All of them could use pivots and ball joints everywhere. Wrist swivels, heads, knees, hips, ANKLES, I don't think it's too much to ask for those things and I can't imagine they add any difficulty to these molds. I just can't.

I hate it when they pull crap like this. Starscream actually looks like something I'd buy, I really do like him quite a bit, but the lack of something as simple as ankle pivots drives me insane.

Tsk tsk tsk. Sure, the lack of some articulations is a bummer for a lots of us. But you seem to miss the point of this line. SIMPLIFICATION. Too much articulations mean automatically a more complicated transformation. Most kids and adults that are just entering into the world of Transformers would have no clue where to start. So it's a great way to introduce the classic designs to beginners.

Never forget that before doing algebra one must first learn that 1+1=2.

Actually, the first Transformers figure I got was a really complicated figure. I think it was Animated Bee, his transformation to vehicle mode was impossible! Then again, I was 8 so......

What I don't get is why they don't just make figures like they did back during the transformers cybertron/galaxy force days. Those things were a snap to transform but had a ton of articulation.

LE0KING wrote:What I don't get is why they don't just make figures like they did back during the transformers cybertron/galaxy force days. Those things were a snap to transform but had a ton of articulation.

Hell yeah, Cybertron is DAH TITS!
One of the best TF line ever, giving a perfect mix of old shcool and modern, while being both kid and hardcore friendly. I wouldnt mind if Hasbro pull a 2007 Movie by sneaking a few more Cybertron repaints into some main lines.

Hmm. I like Megatron and Starscream more and more... The only thing that bothers me about Megatron is that face sculpt, it's a bit off. Starscream, Optimus and Bumblebee all look good in that department, but Megatron's just a wee bit off.

I'd still snap him up in a heartbeat, though. 'Screamer's first, however.

Autobot032 wrote:

-Kanrabat- wrote:

Autobot032 wrote:Y'know, I don't mind these simplified transformations and upsizing or downsizing when they're done right and some of these are done right. What bothers me, immensely I might add, is that their articulation is severely limited on some things.

All of them could use pivots and ball joints everywhere. Wrist swivels, heads, knees, hips, ANKLES, I don't think it's too much to ask for those things and I can't imagine they add any difficulty to these molds. I just can't.

I hate it when they pull crap like this. Starscream actually looks like something I'd buy, I really do like him quite a bit, but the lack of something as simple as ankle pivots drives me insane.

Tsk tsk tsk. Sure, the lack of some articulations is a bummer for a lots of us. But you seem to miss the point of this line. SIMPLIFICATION. Too much articulations mean automatically a more complicated transformation. Most kids and adults that are just entering into the world of Transformers would have no clue where to start. So it's a great way to introduce the classic designs to beginners.

Never forget that before doing algebra one must first learn that 1+1=2.

Well, I'm certainly offended. Thanks for talking down to me, which wasn't necessary. Why, exactly, do you assume someone is stupid and needs it explained? Why am I not allowed to have my opinion without people like you crapping all over it?

I missed nothing, including the point of this line. An ankle pivot would add an extra step to Starscream's transformation? Really? A side to side pivot? A wrist that swivels?

In the future, think before you post something like this. It's offensive and unnecessary. Don't do it again.

Exactly how was Kanrabat being offensive ?

Over on the devy thread, it was me complaining about an over-simplified kiddie figure and you were defending it against my anti-kiddie jokes.

But on this thread youre complaining about over-simplification and someone else is saying the same thing you told me...these were meant for kids.

You really should lighten up. You seem to think everyone is being offensive but in reality theyre just speaking their mind. Or as your buddy Burn would say #justbeingoutspoken

As much as I dislike the over-simplification of lines like this giant-Legends class range (I remember when I was a kid and we were annoyed with the way things like Throttlebots and Pretenders lacked the complexity of the earlier Transformer toys which we had no trouble transforming. Not to say those simplified TF's didn't have their own appeal though), that Grimlock looks kinda fun. If I come across is in a sale for way cheaper than it is I may purchase it as a desk toy.

yay.. more garbage that isn't going to sell and will clog shelf space for months.. what a joy.

TimothyR wrote:yay.. more garbage that isn't going to sell and will clog shelf space for months.. what a joy.

GUYS! WE GOT A BUSINESS MANAGER OVER HERE!


Come on, those are ACTUAL Transformers. Also, even if you don't like it, dosent mean the one-steps and simple TFs wont sell. At first glance, it look like the things don't sell, bu8t in fact, it sell like hotcakes. Locally, even if the simple stuff's pegs are always full, I notice that it's never constantly the same figures! That mean they sell a lot.

Plus, those guys in this thread are classic inspired. That fact alone will make then sell even faster. You must live on another planet to see A WHOLE LINE of classic inspired toys shelfwarm.

Are... are Megatron's feet just a bunch of MISSILE PODS?!?!

Noideaforaname wrote:Are... are Megatron's feet just a bunch of MISSILE PODS?!?!

Yup!

Noideaforaname wrote:Are... are Megatron's feet just a bunch of MISSILE PODS?!?!

"Watch it, gang! His toes are loaded!"

*gasp*

"And each one of my little piggies is gonna blast ya!"

Noideaforaname wrote:Are... are Megatron's feet just a bunch of MISSILE PODS?!?!

Actually that's pretty metal. Imagine- he kicks someone in the face and lets loose a barrage of rockets directly into their head. That's, like, Getter Robo levels of super-robot madness.

Delta Magnus wrote:

Noideaforaname wrote:Are... are Megatron's feet just a bunch of MISSILE PODS?!?!

Actually that's pretty metal. Imagine- he kicks someone in the face and lets loose a barrage of rockets directly into their head. That's, like, Getter Robo levels of super-robot madness.

Where's a gif of GoDannar's Soul Breaker when I need it...?

I'm definitely looking forward to some in hand reviews of these guys. I don't expect tons, but some of these look pretty nice.

That Megatron almost looks cool.

Brazilian fansite Transformers Dioramas has posted some new images from Naabrin, the same show that brought the latest Devastator images.

These images are of the upcoming two subclasses of the Generations Cyber series which contain 11 inch and 7 inch simplified Transformers toys of classic characters. These are the very first live images we have ever seen of these figures, and mirrored below you will find the two Optimus toys, 11 inch Bumblebee and 7 inch Megatron in alt mode. An RID Warrior class Bumblebee is mistakenly inserted there as well but it actually helps give us a sense of the scale of these figures.

They put the wrong Bumblebee in front of that box.

Sabrblade wrote:They put the wrong Bumblebee in front of that box.

Did you read my news post?

william-james88 wrote:

Sabrblade wrote:They put the wrong Bumblebee in front of that box.

Did you read my news post?

Just making a casual observation to chuckle at.

Sabrblade wrote:

william-james88 wrote:

Sabrblade wrote:They put the wrong Bumblebee in front of that box.

Did you read my news post?

Just making a casual observation to chuckle at.

Its all good, I like chuckling too

This does give us a point of reference though.

Are these available at retail in South America or wherever these are going to be sold?

Seibertron wrote:Are these available at retail in South America or wherever these are going to be sold?

There have only been reports of online retailers, nothing brick and mortar yet.

That Megatron picture on the box is making this look to be a nicely styled, if simplistic G1 Tank Megatron.

I am kinda diggin these...I guess my simplified OP from Prime got me going on stuff like this...Couple things though:
* DAMN 11" OP needs some sides in vehicle mode. Thats just odd to me.
* Talk about MISTRANSFORMED?!? Poor Megs....smh
* Bumblebee looks pretty sharp in bot mode...just WISH he wasnt BB.

Would an 11" Decepticon have killed them, by the way?

I don't find anything special with these figures. They are just bigger versions of Legends class toys, just as those final waves of Beast Hunters toys, Deluxe or Voyager class sized Cyberverse toys.

Nemesis Primal wrote:Would an 11" Decepticon have killed them, by the way?

Well, Decepticons have been known to kill people.

This "simplified" direction Hasbro is heading in is terrible. Couldn't they at least hid the hollowness? These just look cheap and are still going to be overpriced.