Seibertron.com Energon Pub Forums

by **Prime Riblet** » Mon Mar 22, 2010 11:56 am

I actually don't even dislike it. That's the funny thing. I can understand price-point being an issue, since Voyagers aren't exactly cheap. I do think the Voyager Ironhide is worth the extra money for what you get, especially if we are talking about the $12 price-point. Now, if we see it for the rollback $9.00 price, I will be ready to pounce all over it.

News Credits: 8 · by **Megatron Wolf** » Mon Mar 22, 2010 12:42 pm

cool they gave him the turret from the game. Deluxe Ratchet is awesome so i think ill pick this one up too.

by **ang3l3s** » Mon Mar 22, 2010 1:00 pm

Prime Riblet wrote:This is a waste of time, IMO. The Voyager figure is really good, and it is hard to beat the 07 Premium Ironhide. I will stick with that.

+1, How many renditions do we really need, do another line or make more movie versions of the animated, i only buy 1 oaf a character in a line ie: leader prime, megs, jetfire,....unless it's buster prime and jetfire.

by **Rated X** » Mon Mar 22, 2010 10:08 pm

Like I said before with Ratchet, whats the point of downsizing from voyager to deluxe ??? This was a waste of time even creating this mold because it was time wasted that they could have used to bring us characters that dont have a figure like the remaining constructicons.

by **Enygma177** » Mon Mar 22, 2010 11:26 pm

Not really digging him myself. While I do like the head and the tie-in with the game, the arms just seem too stubby, and that light blue that the hands seem to be colored just look... wrong.

News Credits: 668 · by **Autobot032** » Tue Mar 23, 2010 12:49 am

Counterpunch wrote:Ironhide usually = awesome

Where did this go wrong?

Movie Ironhide (and Ratchet) just works better as a Voyager Class figure.

Deluxe is great for many a character, but it does make the design suffer sometimes, and this is a shining example of that suffrage.

The blue is just ridiculous. It looks terrible.
He's too squat and proportioned weirdly.
Sadly, the only good part of him is that ridiculous looking cannon accessory.

by **CAPTAINIRLAND** » Tue Mar 23, 2010 9:05 am

Duds,
if you have the voyager Ironhide........ it's ****!
This look's cool and afordable, I think the transformation look better too.

News Credits: 668 · by **Autobot032** » Tue Mar 23, 2010 1:35 pm

CAPTAINIRLAND wrote:Duds,
if you have the voyager Ironhide........ it's ****!
This look's cool and afordable, I think the transformation look better too.

Ah, a perfect example of opinion being thrown around as if it was golden truth, and with no respect for the opinion of others.

Those of us who put the figure down, directed our comments towards the figure itself, we never once denounced the opinions of the people who look upon this figure favorably. Unlike you, who did.

The only thing you're right about (and is a fact) is that it's affordable.

The rest of what you said is pure opinion, not fact. Some may agree with you, some may not. Don't be surprised if there's quite a few who don't.

Show some respect next time. Even if you don't agree, be polite.

News Credits: 37 · by **SlyTF1** » Tue Mar 23, 2010 3:37 pm

CAPTAINIRLAND wrote:Duds,
if you have the voyager Ironhide........ it's ****!
This look's cool and afordable, I think the transformation look better too.

by **Alex Jones** » Tue Mar 23, 2010 5:02 pm

Autobot032 wrote:
Counterpunch wrote:Ironhide usually = awesome

Where did this go wrong?

Movie Ironhide (and Ratchet) just works better as a Voyager Class figure.

Deluxe is great for many a character, but it does make the design suffer sometimes, and this is a shining example of that suffrage.

The blue is just ridiculous. It looks terrible.
He's too squat and proportioned weirdly.
Sadly, the only good part of him is that ridiculous looking cannon accessory.

Isn't ironhide supposed to be squat and wierdly proportional?