Rodimus Prime wrote:I played the game for RoTF and wasn't impressed. Are the other games the same way? I recently checked out the PS2 game for the 1st movie, and it looked OK. Do the movie games all play the same?
Smokescreen wrote:All of which were games that I liked.
Wigglez wrote:Just remember. The sword is an extension of your arm. Use it as if you're going to karate chop someone with your really long sharp ass hand.
Shadowman wrote:Smokescreen wrote:All of which were good games.
Fixed that one for you. They wouldn't have gotten terrible reviews if they were objectively good. (The best any of the movie tie-ins got on Metacritic was ROTF getting 63/100)
Smokescreen wrote:Shadowman wrote:Smokescreen wrote:All of which were good games.
Fixed that one for you. They wouldn't have gotten terrible reviews if they were objectively good. (The best any of the movie tie-ins got on Metacritic was ROTF getting 63/100)
I don't base my information from opinions of one website.
Wigglez wrote:Just remember. The sword is an extension of your arm. Use it as if you're going to karate chop someone with your really long sharp ass hand.
Shadowman wrote:Smokescreen wrote:Shadowman wrote:Smokescreen wrote:All of which were good games.
Fixed that one for you. They wouldn't have gotten terrible reviews if they were objectively good. (The best any of the movie tie-ins got on Metacritic was ROTF getting 63/100)
I don't base my information from opinions of one website.
So when I say the movie tie-ins got, at best, a 63/100, that means that, out of all reviews, it has an average score of 63.
Pot Bot wrote:Long gone are the days i read reviews for anything at all. No matter how many different sites they come off.
Smokescreen wrote:Pot Bot wrote:Long gone are the days i read reviews for anything at all. No matter how many different sites they come off.
Big Thumbs Up!
Smokescreen wrote:Shadowman wrote:Smokescreen wrote:Shadowman wrote:Smokescreen wrote:All of which were good games.
Fixed that one for you. They wouldn't have gotten terrible reviews if they were objectively good. (The best any of the movie tie-ins got on Metacritic was ROTF getting 63/100)
I don't base my information from opinions of one website.
So when I say the movie tie-ins got, at best, a 63/100, that means that, out of all reviews, it has an average score of 63.
Maybe I need to rephrase myself.. I don't base my information from opinions of websites. I base my opinions off the users.
Wigglez wrote:Just remember. The sword is an extension of your arm. Use it as if you're going to karate chop someone with your really long sharp ass hand.
Shadowman wrote:Smokescreen wrote:Shadowman wrote:Smokescreen wrote:Shadowman wrote:Smokescreen wrote:All of which were good games.
Fixed that one for you. They wouldn't have gotten terrible reviews if they were objectively good. (The best any of the movie tie-ins got on Metacritic was ROTF getting 63/100)
I don't base my information from opinions of one website.
So when I say the movie tie-ins got, at best, a 63/100, that means that, out of all reviews, it has an average score of 63.
Maybe I need to rephrase myself.. I don't base my information from opinions of websites. I base my opinions off the users.
Metacritic lists user reviews as well, but on a 10-point scale. ROTF got a 7.9 so...nothing changes here.
Smokescreen wrote:Shadowman wrote:Smokescreen wrote:Shadowman wrote:Smokescreen wrote:Shadowman wrote:Smokescreen wrote:All of which were good games.
Fixed that one for you. They wouldn't have gotten terrible reviews if they were objectively good. (The best any of the movie tie-ins got on Metacritic was ROTF getting 63/100)
I don't base my information from opinions of one website.
So when I say the movie tie-ins got, at best, a 63/100, that means that, out of all reviews, it has an average score of 63.
Maybe I need to rephrase myself.. I don't base my information from opinions of websites. I base my opinions off the users.
Metacritic lists user reviews as well, but on a 10-point scale. ROTF got a 6.3 so...nothing changes here.
There we go.. fixed that for you.. [Changed back because no you didn't, you just linked to a different page from the one I was talking about[
Source = http://www.metacritic.com/game/xbox-360 ... the-fallen
Wigglez wrote:Just remember. The sword is an extension of your arm. Use it as if you're going to karate chop someone with your really long sharp ass hand.
Shadowman wrote:Smokescreen wrote:Shadowman wrote:Smokescreen wrote:Shadowman wrote:Smokescreen wrote:Shadowman wrote:Smokescreen wrote:All of which were good games.
Fixed that one for you. They wouldn't have gotten terrible reviews if they were objectively good. (The best any of the movie tie-ins got on Metacritic was ROTF getting 63/100)
I don't base my information from opinions of one website.
So when I say the movie tie-ins got, at best, a 63/100, that means that, out of all reviews, it has an average score of 63.
Maybe I need to rephrase myself.. I don't base my information from opinions of websites. I base my opinions off the users.
Metacritic lists user reviews as well, but on a 10-point scale. ROTF got a 7.9 so...nothing changes here.
There we go.. fixed that for you..
Source = http://www.metacritic.com/game/xbox-360 ... the-fallen
You didn't click the link I posted earlier, did you? I mean, the fact that you didn't even know Metacritic had user reviews until I explained it to you, and now you're linking to a completely different one, with a different score from the one I listed. (Which has, since then, shot up to a 7.9)
That still doesn't change anything though, that critically, the movie tie-ins are "Meh" at best.
Smokescreen wrote:Shadowman wrote:Smokescreen wrote:Shadowman wrote:Smokescreen wrote:Shadowman wrote:Smokescreen wrote:Shadowman wrote:Smokescreen wrote:All of which were good games.
Fixed that one for you. They wouldn't have gotten terrible reviews if they were objectively good. (The best any of the movie tie-ins got on Metacritic was ROTF getting 63/100)
I don't base my information from opinions of one website.
So when I say the movie tie-ins got, at best, a 63/100, that means that, out of all reviews, it has an average score of 63.
Maybe I need to rephrase myself.. I don't base my information from opinions of websites. I base my opinions off the users.
Metacritic lists user reviews as well, but on a 10-point scale. ROTF got a 7.9 so...nothing changes here.
There we go.. fixed that for you..
Source = http://www.metacritic.com/game/xbox-360 ... the-fallen
You didn't click the link I posted earlier, did you? I mean, the fact that you didn't even know Metacritic had user reviews until I explained it to you, and now you're linking to a completely different one, with a different score from the one I listed. (Which has, since then, shot up to a 7.9)
That still doesn't change anything though, that critically, the movie tie-ins are "Meh" at best.
Actually I did know what metacritic was. I stated before that I could care less what "website(s)" rate a game. I am more interested in what my friends have to say about it as well as what I think of the game. If they don't have any input to the game, I refer to other gamers who play the game. Therefore I seek advice from other gamers and see what they rated a game. It seems you are sour towards the games and are therefore trying to condescend me in some fashion. Why you are doing this, I have no idea as I have never done or said anything to you in the likes before. Everybody has their own opinion about games. I was merely stating mine and where I seek advice. You listed a score from a website which I could care less about. I replied showing what the users scored the game as, which seems to make you recant in some manner. I didn't come here to debate scores or anything of the sort with the likes of you. I came to read others input and give my own opinions which you clearly have a discord for.
Wigglez wrote:Just remember. The sword is an extension of your arm. Use it as if you're going to karate chop someone with your really long sharp ass hand.
Shadowman wrote:Smokescreen wrote:Shadowman wrote:Smokescreen wrote:Shadowman wrote:Smokescreen wrote:Shadowman wrote:Smokescreen wrote:Shadowman wrote:Smokescreen wrote:All of which were good games.
Fixed that one for you. They wouldn't have gotten terrible reviews if they were objectively good. (The best any of the movie tie-ins got on Metacritic was ROTF getting 63/100)
I don't base my information from opinions of one website.
So when I say the movie tie-ins got, at best, a 63/100, that means that, out of all reviews, it has an average score of 63.
Maybe I need to rephrase myself.. I don't base my information from opinions of websites. I base my opinions off the users.
Metacritic lists user reviews as well, but on a 10-point scale. ROTF got a 7.9 so...nothing changes here.
There we go.. fixed that for you..
Source = http://www.metacritic.com/game/xbox-360 ... the-fallen
You didn't click the link I posted earlier, did you? I mean, the fact that you didn't even know Metacritic had user reviews until I explained it to you, and now you're linking to a completely different one, with a different score from the one I listed. (Which has, since then, shot up to a 7.9)
That still doesn't change anything though, that critically, the movie tie-ins are "Meh" at best.
Actually I did know what metacritic was. I stated before that I could care less what "website(s)" rate a game. I am more interested in what my friends have to say about it as well as what I think of the game. If they don't have any input to the game, I refer to other gamers who play the game. Therefore I seek advice from other gamers and see what they rated a game. It seems you are sour towards the games and are therefore trying to condescend me in some fashion. Why you are doing this, I have no idea as I have never done or said anything to you in the likes before. Everybody has their own opinion about games. I was merely stating mine and where I seek advice. You listed a score from a website which I could care less about. I replied showing what the users scored the game as, which seems to make you recant in some manner. I didn't come here to debate scores or anything of the sort with the likes of you. I came to read others input and give my own opinions which you clearly have a discord for.
My point was the way you worded your initial point presented your opinion as if it were objective fact, when if fact general consensus is far less favorable. You just kind of blew it out of proportion.
Incidentally, you keep contradicting yourself. Possibly because you think "websites" are computer-generated or something, but every review, professional or otherwise, are written by gamers. So, literally speaking, in one sentence, you don't care how gamers rated the game. Then two sentences later, you admit that you do.
Moreover, no, I seriously doubt you knew what Metacritic was before I explained it to you, considering you keep acting as if the site lacks some aspect or another until I bring it up.
Return to Video Games and Mobile Apps Forum
Registered users: Bing [Bot], Bumblevivisector, Dino-Snarl, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot], Roadbuster, SupersonicShockwave, Triceratops3