cloudballoon wrote:We collectors need to recognize another factor: the how many of us are there buying collector-grade TFs from Hasbro? I don't know the #, but my guess is either a shrinking one or at least not matching their growth forecast thta shareholders demand.
DeathReviews wrote:And the fact that Hasbro is relying on Earthspark to give them better numbers in Q4 is explicitly them writing collectors off. To anyone doubting it, that statement from them concerning financial survival shows that our purchases are not big enough to sustain them or the brand. Marketing towards us is not part of their immediate recover plan.
If so, then we should look for them to scale back (or terminate) lines like Legacy, Studio Series and MP figures, which do seem geared towards collectors. And I do admit - most of the figures the minions see warming shelf are figures like SS Kup, Blurr, and pretty much all of the Legacy repaints like Buzzsaw, Nightprowler, etc. Though there's still no sign of Velocitron Cosmos anywhere near my realm...
william-james88 wrote:The lower sales specified by Hasbro were from parents not buying as many toys as last year. Nothing was said about collectors. We either matched the expected demand OR (more likely) we don't buy enough for a drop to be seen as significant.
I am seeing it the total opposite. By them saying that the issue is with parents not buying enough toys, it means that whatever we collectors buy or don't buy doesn't really impact them now. If there is no significant impact (either because we are fewer than many of us here think OR because collectively we havent bought so much less than before) then none of those lines will be touched. We just keep chucking along while Hasbro has to make sales for other toylines and encourage the sale of Earthspark toys. Basically, I don't forsee any changes to the Legacy or SS lines aside from sales to encourage parents to buy them.
william-james88 wrote:By the way (the following isn't aimed at anybody), while all of us are looking at it through the lens of a collector, the whole point of this article is more about the impact for parents and kids. While we find those prices hard to swallow, it must be amplified for parents that might treat their kid with a toy or buy something for a birthday. A parent's budget for buying a gift for a kid in their son's class has not gone up a ton. And the fact that Hasbro is relying on Earthspark to give them better numbers in Q4 is explicitly them writing collectors off. To anyone doubting it, that statement from them concerning financial survival shows that our purchases are not big enough to sustain them or the brand. Marketing towards us is not part of their immediate recover plan.
sol magnus wrote:william-james88 wrote:By the way (the following isn't aimed at anybody), while all of us are looking at it through the lens of a collector, the whole point of this article is more about the impact for parents and kids. While we find those prices hard to swallow, it must be amplified for parents that might treat their kid with a toy or buy something for a birthday. A parent's budget for buying a gift for a kid in their son's class has not gone up a ton. And the fact that Hasbro is relying on Earthspark to give them better numbers in Q4 is explicitly them writing collectors off. To anyone doubting it, that statement from them concerning financial survival shows that our purchases are not big enough to sustain them or the brand. Marketing towards us is not part of their immediate recover plan.
Implicitly.
For it to be explicit, they would literally have to say "we're writing off collectors." There's no reading between the lines for explicit. But I like the cut of your gib.
Return to Transformers General Discussion
Registered users: Bing [Bot], DarthFoozar, Freezie, Glyph, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Yahoo [Bot]