USA Today Article on Transformers Movie, Sequel and Fan Influence
Thursday, July 12th, 2007 10:59AM CDT
Categories: Movie Related News, Digital Media News, InterviewsPosted by: Skowl Views: 18,404
Topic Options: View Discussion · Sign in or Join to reply
Read the full article here.
And don't forget to check out Seibertron.com's Massive Movie section for all the info you need on this summer's Blockbuster film!
News Search
Got Transformers News? Let us know here!
Most Popular Transformers News
Most Recent Transformers News
Posted by 1337W422102 on July 12th, 2007 @ 11:12am CDT
"It's not like we need to go out and have that expense again of 'How does Optimus Prime transform?' with 10,000 moving parts," he says. "So in the future that expense doesn't have to be prohibitive."
I'm not really sure I understand what they're talking about in the part I just copypasta'd above. Wouldn't a simple solution be, I don't know, NOT having so many moving parts?
Posted by osubot20 on July 12th, 2007 @ 11:15am CDT
Mine:Prime, Ironhide, Hound, Dinobots, Cliffjumper, Hot Rod, and Inferno or Bluestreak or Sunstreaker
Megatron or Galvatron, Starscream, Astrotrain, Ravage, Soundwave, Shrapnel, Constructicons, and Shockwave
Posted by Bed Bugs on July 12th, 2007 @ 11:16am CDT
1337W422102 wrote:Way to go, Boss Man!!
"It's not like we need to go out and have that expense again of 'How does Optimus Prime transform?' with 10,000 moving parts," he says. "So in the future that expense doesn't have to be prohibitive."
I'm not really sure I understand what they're talking about in the part I just copypasta'd above. Wouldn't a simple solution be, I don't know, NOT having so many moving parts?
Basically, they had to pay the computer graphics people for extra time in trying to design the Optimus Prime CGI model. Trying to figure out how to make him transform must have taken a while.
Now that they have the model built, they can just copy it for the next film. Save time, save money.
Posted by Flashback77 on July 12th, 2007 @ 11:17am CDT
I think the human bits were necessary here. But now that the introductions are out of the way, shift to the robots. And please do SOMETHING with Starscream.
Posted by Seibertron on July 12th, 2007 @ 11:24am CDT
Posted by Megatron Wolf on July 12th, 2007 @ 11:36am CDT
Posted by Ground Zero on July 12th, 2007 @ 12:27pm CDT
- Ditch the reams of bad one-liners.
- You have a handful of undeveloped Transformers on your hands. Learn from Beast Wars -- develop them before you pile in new characters.
- Ask people off the street what their fondest memories of Transformers are -- not the "fandom". Particularly since you're just going to alter them to suit your film anyway.
- Put more development into your villains.
- Less cheeze with the Sector 7 guys.
Posted by BingoBrown on July 12th, 2007 @ 1:00pm CDT
Seibertron wrote:One of the things I really liked about the movie is that they really played up the "hiding in plain sight" aspect of the Transformers. That's something we really haven't seen since the very beginning of the Transformers ... it's an aspect that I've felt got lost somewhere down the road and it was really great to see the movie folks embrace that so much.
I agree with you, to an extent. However, one of my big gripes with the movie was that they made it too obvious when a vehicle/aircraft/whatever was a transformer before it transformed. The only time they didn't was Frenzy, and he was on screen for about two seconds before he transformed. I guess to a lesser extent they did it with Barricade, but that wasn't a terribly surprising transformation.
And I don't mean to say that we, the ubergeeks... uh, fans, should have been surprised by a transformation. I realize that we knew all of the transformers and alt modes before the movie was ever released. But for Joe Moviegoer, he was never totally shocked or surprised by a transformation. I would have liked to see an unexpected transformer or transformation.
Posted by supreme commander galvatr on July 12th, 2007 @ 1:35pm CDT
Posted by Bouncy X on July 12th, 2007 @ 2:01pm CDT
i mean i figured the whole car would change but nope...just the wheel..lol
Posted by Hanch Prime on July 12th, 2007 @ 4:06pm CDT
Posted by dragons on July 12th, 2007 @ 6:27pm CDT
if they gave the fans to much power half the fans will like the sequel they will see they favorite robot in the film and the other half will be unhappy there are too many autobots, and only 5 decpticons fighting 9 autobots so they would aloso have to make some deciosions on there own as well on what they think will be good for the sequesl to just my opionion.
Posted by i_amtrunks on July 12th, 2007 @ 6:27pm CDT
I like that they keep trying to use the "Prime has over 10,000 pieces" argument, but the majority of the Transformers had less than 4,000 pieces, so what's the excuse for not giving them more screen time?
Posted by Warthog on July 12th, 2007 @ 6:43pm CDT
Incidentally, for the movie that they did (which was amazing) they did a better job of introducing us to the Autobots' personalities than the series did, at least until more than halfway through the first season.
Posted by decepticon4life on July 12th, 2007 @ 7:11pm CDT
bot character development
better movie structure.... i.e no cutting scenes out that leave movie goer's upset asking what happened to a character.
better shooting of fight scenes... i.e. no shaky fight scenes seemingly shot 4 feet away leaving a garbled mess. the movie makes money so quit cutting corners!
Posted by Liege Evilmus on July 12th, 2007 @ 7:22pm CDT
Posted by Omega_Supreme on July 12th, 2007 @ 7:37pm CDT
I would like to see the same humor but more focused storyline. These guys have been alive for hundreds of years so I would like to see more backfill on how the transformers relate to each other. Friendships, sworn enemies.. ect ect.
Also I am not a real big fan of killing off half dozen TF's per movie. Disable, yes. But that is just me.
And one last thing: For the love of everything holy... DON'T KILL OPTIMUS PRIME!! That has been done way way way to many times..
Posted by fairplaythings on July 13th, 2007 @ 3:18pm CDT
Oh, off topic, one is using the word "IT" as possessive, it is spelled "ITS". For example, "Seibertron.com and its owner, Ryan." "IT'S" refers to a contraction of IT and IS. It is a common typo but is grating nonetheless.