This page contains affiliate links. We may earn commissions when readers interact with or purchase items through these links. For more information, see our affiliate disclosures here.

TRANSFORMERS 5: Mark Wahlberg Thinks Michael Bay Will Direct

Transformers News: TRANSFORMERS 5: Mark Wahlberg Thinks Michael Bay Will Direct

Saturday, June 13th, 2015 10:07AM CDT

Categories: Movie Related News, Rumors
Posted by: william-james88   Views: 125,529

Topic Options: View Discussion · Sign in or Join to reply

An interview between Mark Wahlberg and Collider's Christina Radish, for the upcoming Ted 2 movie, adds to the previous rumblings that Michael Bay will return as the director to the 5th installment of the Transformers series.

It's a short quote which went like this:

Collider: Do you have any update on the status of Transformers 5? Have you heard anything about what’s going on?

WAHLBERG: I don’t. Just that Akiva [Goldsman] and those guys are starting to write and break stories, and stuff like that. But [Michael] Bay is in Malta shooting Benghazi, and I’m in New Orleans shooting Deepwater. We’ll get together when he gets back.

Do you think he'll still ultimately direct it?

WAHLBERG: Yes.


Do you think Michael Bay will still ultimately direct it? Do you hope he does? Sound off in the Energon Pub!
Credit(s): collider

News Search

Got Transformers News? Let us know here!

Most Popular Transformers News

Most Recent Transformers News

Re: TRANSFORMERS 5: Mark Wahlberg Thinks Michael Bay Will Direct (1697972)
Posted by acchillyaout on June 13th, 2015 @ 10:20am CDT
Best news I've heard all 2015. This just made my day. Can't wait to see this movie. Might even bring in more than Avengers did!
Re: TRANSFORMERS 5: Mark Wahlberg Thinks Michael Bay Will Direct (1697980)
Posted by CrankyOldTruck on June 13th, 2015 @ 10:47am CDT
Time to cue the fan rage from all the ignorant masses that still seem to think that Bay was the one who was 100% responsible for destroying their childhood.

Go ahead folks, I could use a good laugh this morning. >:oP
Re: TRANSFORMERS 5: Mark Wahlberg Thinks Michael Bay Will Direct (1697984)
Posted by dreadwing95 on June 13th, 2015 @ 10:54am CDT
CrankyOldTruck wrote:Time to cue the fan rage from all the ignorant masses that still seem to think that Bay was the one who was 100% responsible for destroying their childhood.

Go ahead folks, I could use a good laugh this morning. >:oP

i dont mind that there are changes to transformers. there are always changes. i just dont like bays style of directing. i just hope the writers can somehow salvage this franchise considering its now a roundtable of them now
Re: TRANSFORMERS 5: Mark Wahlberg Thinks Michael Bay Will Direct (1697992)
Posted by Nemesis Maximo on June 13th, 2015 @ 11:05am CDT
I don't blame Bay for Everything, but you can't deny that he has a lot of clout in his decision making.

The first film was undeniably awesome, even for it's flaws. I really appreciate Bay's talent for destruction and practical special effects. And the Decepticons were mostly a scary shadowy threat.

ROTF, on the other hand, I do blame him for, because of the writer's strike. He specifically requested that Devastator have "wrecking balls." And he helped design the twins. Although admittedly, I think I like it better than AOE.

DOTM was definitely a step in the right direction, and was mostly enjoyable, if a bit long.

AOE was pretty disappointing to me, as the Dinobots felt like last minute additions; the plot was less coherent than ROTF; and the movie was tooooooooo daaaaaaaaamn loooooooong. And too many characters. And Nicola Peltz. Terrible.
Re: TRANSFORMERS 5: Mark Wahlberg Thinks Michael Bay Will Direct (1698027)
Posted by Kup98ss on June 13th, 2015 @ 1:07pm CDT
Well, the first movie was good.
I have given up on a good live action movie for now.

How about hasbro giving us a good animated movie, just like the quality movies that DC releases to DVD.
Re: TRANSFORMERS 5: Mark Wahlberg Thinks Michael Bay Will Direct (1698029)
Posted by Deadput on June 13th, 2015 @ 1:11pm CDT
Nemesis Maximo wrote:
AOE was pretty disappointing to me, as the Dinobots felt like last minute additions; the plot was less coherent than ROTF; and the movie was tooooooooo daaaaaaaaamn loooooooong. And too many characters. And Nicola Peltz. Terrible.



The Dinobots were actually supposed to debut in 5 with minor hints to them in 4 but Hasbro pretty much made Bay and the writer team shove them in for marketing reasons.



In other words Dinobots were a last minute addition just like Jolt in ROTF.
Re: TRANSFORMERS 5: Mark Wahlberg Thinks Michael Bay Will Direct (1698042)
Posted by Deadput on June 13th, 2015 @ 1:39pm CDT
THIS IS NOT A CONFIRMATION BAY IS BACK!



This is an actor saying he thinks Bay will return


Just saying this in case some people misread the title and article.
Re: TRANSFORMERS 5: Mark Wahlberg Thinks Michael Bay Will Direct (1698106)
Posted by MartianSpyGirl1996 on June 13th, 2015 @ 4:52pm CDT
CrankyOldTruck wrote:Time to cue the fan rage from all the ignorant masses that still seem to think that Bay was the one who was 100% responsible for destroying their childhood.

Go ahead folks, I could use a good laugh this morning. >:oP

People are ignorant because they have a different opinion than you? K...
Re: TRANSFORMERS 5: Mark Wahlberg Thinks Michael Bay Will Direct (1698149)
Posted by budmaloney on June 13th, 2015 @ 6:21pm CDT
I don't want to live on this planet anymore. It doesn't end! If this is true, you should put the expectation that Bay will still be directing Transformers in the next 1000 years. His clones or cyborg self...whatever. There is a point of no return, and I think we passed it with TF sadly. TF has jumped the shark everybody!

Sigh...what depressing news. ( I know even if it's a rumor, we all know it's going to be true. I may not like his movies, but I think Bay isn't stupid, he's not going to walk away from a chance to make millions)
Re: TRANSFORMERS 5: Mark Wahlberg Thinks Michael Bay Will Direct (1698163)
Posted by Deadput on June 13th, 2015 @ 6:55pm CDT
budmaloney wrote:I don't want to live on this planet anymore. It doesn't end! If this is true, you should put the expectation that Bay will still be directing Transformers in the next 1000 years. His clones or cyborg self...whatever. There is a point of no return, and I think we passed it with TF sadly. TF has jumped the shark everybody!

Sigh...what depressing news. ( I know even if it's a rumor, we all know it's going to be true. I may not like his movies, but I think Bay isn't stupid, he's not going to walk away from a chance to make millions)




Something like this makes want to die?



I'm sorry but there is more to life then fictional robots from your childhood that most of the time other people don't care about.



(Most people don't care about other peoples childhoods and not just for Transformers just other childhoods in general because were a horrible species)
Re: TRANSFORMERS 5: Mark Wahlberg Thinks Michael Bay Will Direct (1698173)
Posted by Sabrblade on June 13th, 2015 @ 7:19pm CDT
mirageandjazz1197 wrote:Something like this makes want to die?
Or move to a another planet.

Frankly I'd prefer a space colony since that sounds cooler to me, but that's just me. He can go to whatever planet he wants. :P
Re: TRANSFORMERS 5: Mark Wahlberg Thinks Michael Bay Will Direct (1698176)
Posted by Burn on June 13th, 2015 @ 7:23pm CDT
Sabrblade wrote:
mirageandjazz1197 wrote:Something like this makes want to die?
Or move to a another planet.

Frankly I'd prefer a space colony since that sounds cooler to me, but that's just me. He can go to whatever planet he wants. :P

Doesn't matter where you go, you're bound to pick up a stray transmission and next thing you know you're watching a Bay TF movie.

Alternatively, people could stop clicking on movie related news, ignore the movie related sub-forum, and ignore the movies when they come out in theatres and then on DVD/Blu-Ray. >:oP
Re: TRANSFORMERS 5: Mark Wahlberg Thinks Michael Bay Will Direct (1698208)
Posted by budmaloney on June 13th, 2015 @ 9:37pm CDT
mirageandjazz1197 wrote:
budmaloney wrote:I don't want to live on this planet anymore. It doesn't end! If this is true, you should put the expectation that Bay will still be directing Transformers in the next 1000 years. His clones or cyborg self...whatever. There is a point of no return, and I think we passed it with TF sadly. TF has jumped the shark everybody!

Sigh...what depressing news. ( I know even if it's a rumor, we all know it's going to be true. I may not like his movies, but I think Bay isn't stupid, he's not going to walk away from a chance to make millions)




Something like this makes want to die?



I'm sorry but there is more to life then fictional robots from your childhood that most of the time other people don't care about.



(Most people don't care about other peoples childhoods and not just for Transformers just other childhoods in general because were a horrible species)


sorry I meant to allude to the Professor Farnsworth meme from Futurama. Not literally thankfully :). Though your point is fair. But I'm not actually concerned about Bay because he "ruined my childhood" as many like to say. I think my childhood is always there, you can always open G1 or whatever cartoon/ memories. And it's fair to expect that Bayformers have contributed to other people's childhoods perhaps even more so than mine. My gripe with Bay really stems from bad movies and scripts. The loss of potential is what makes me want to move to another planet ..or colony. With 200 million dollars as a budget, surely we should get better movies by now.
Re: TRANSFORMERS 5: Mark Wahlberg Thinks Michael Bay Will Direct (1698236)
Posted by Twitchythe3rd on June 13th, 2015 @ 10:59pm CDT
>:oP Would anyone be surprised by Bay returning at this point?
Re: TRANSFORMERS 5: Mark Wahlberg Thinks Michael Bay Will Direct (1698243)
Posted by Burn on June 13th, 2015 @ 11:07pm CDT
Twitchythe3rd wrote:>:oP

Please actually contribute to the discussion.
Re: TRANSFORMERS 5: Mark Wahlberg Thinks Michael Bay Will Direct (1698653)
Posted by jay5 on June 15th, 2015 @ 9:39am CDT
I heard in this one Scrapper has elbows. :-?
Re: TRANSFORMERS 5: Mark Wahlberg Thinks Michael Bay Will Direct (1698659)
Posted by Sabrblade on June 15th, 2015 @ 9:51am CDT
jay5 wrote:I heard in this one Scrapper has elbows. :-?
Scrapper's in the next movie? :P
Re: TRANSFORMERS 5: Mark Wahlberg Thinks Michael Bay Will Direct (1710298)
Posted by Hip-Hoptimus Rime on July 16th, 2015 @ 8:32pm CDT
Just saw this article, dated today:

http://masterherald.com/transformers-5- ... ion/22220/

Take it for what it is, just a collection of rumors and factoids at this early stage. I know nothing about that website, just stumbled across the article. FWIW.
Re: TRANSFORMERS 5: Mark Wahlberg Thinks Michael Bay Will Direct (1710306)
Posted by SlyTF1 on July 16th, 2015 @ 9:23pm CDT
Hip-Hoptimus Rime wrote:Just saw this article, dated today:

http://masterherald.com/transformers-5- ... ion/22220/

Take it for what it is, just a collection of rumors and factoids at this early stage. I know nothing about that website, just stumbled across the article. FWIW.


Saw this same article on another site months ago. It's not really saying anything new, and the fact that it says Megan Fox was removed from the cast in the 4th movie shows what the people who wrote it know.
Re: TRANSFORMERS 5: Mark Wahlberg Thinks Michael Bay Will Direct (1710629)
Posted by Prime Riblet on July 17th, 2015 @ 7:33pm CDT
Burn wrote:
Sabrblade wrote:
mirageandjazz1197 wrote:Something like this makes want to die?
Or move to a another planet.

Frankly I'd prefer a space colony since that sounds cooler to me, but that's just me. He can go to whatever planet he wants. :P

Doesn't matter where you go, you're bound to pick up a stray transmission and next thing you know you're watching a Bay TF movie.

Alternatively, people could stop clicking on movie related news, ignore the movie related sub-forum, and ignore the movies when they come out in theatres and then on DVD/Blu-Ray. >:oP


Exactly!

Personal choice can be a powerful thing!
Re: TRANSFORMERS 5: Mark Wahlberg Thinks Michael Bay Will Direct (1710634)
Posted by Madeus Prime on July 17th, 2015 @ 8:02pm CDT
Prime Riblet wrote:
Burn wrote:
Sabrblade wrote:
mirageandjazz1197 wrote:Something like this makes want to die?
Or move to a another planet.

Frankly I'd prefer a space colony since that sounds cooler to me, but that's just me. He can go to whatever planet he wants. :P

Doesn't matter where you go, you're bound to pick up a stray transmission and next thing you know you're watching a Bay TF movie.

Alternatively, people could stop clicking on movie related news, ignore the movie related sub-forum, and ignore the movies when they come out in theatres and then on DVD/Blu-Ray. >:oP


Exactly!

Personal choice can be a powerful thing!

Exactly, I haven't even watched AoE since I saw it in theaters, and it's free on Amazon Prime!

Heck, the only reason I saw it in theaters was because I lived in hope that the new actors would've put their foot down on Bay's directing style, or at least would've played the roles better. Boy was I disappointed.
Re: TRANSFORMERS 5: Mark Wahlberg Thinks Michael Bay Will Direct (1710665)
Posted by Burn on July 17th, 2015 @ 11:57pm CDT
Can we not have this thread turn into another "ERMAGHERD THE BAY MOVEIS ARE THE SUXXOR!!111!!!" thread please?

Keep it strictly to rumours, go find one of the thousands of other threads out there to complain or praise the previously released movies.
Re: TRANSFORMERS 5: Mark Wahlberg Thinks Michael Bay Will Direct (1715056)
Posted by RAR on August 1st, 2015 @ 3:24pm CDT
RE : The Transformers in space Rumours....

Modern (SciFi/Comic book) Movies seem to have a tendency to reference something from a comic or other source in some way and then at the same time drastically change things : sometimes those changes are not actually wrong just a little unusual and people sometimes think they are some kind of mistake when they are not.

Examples being the more soft skinned Thing in the previous FF4 Movies and Yellow Jacket being a Villain in Ant Man neither are "wrong" they are just unusual to a casual fan.

At one point fewer member of a casual audience would have been familar with the Black Spider-man costume - but now I think that is a lot more recognisable these days.

Change isn't always a bad thing - like making Batman's costume tones much darker in movies for example.

The concern I have with Transformers Movies is they like to throw references at them that they themselves barely understand or ones that perhaps many didn't even want in the 1st place.

If you were making a list of Transformers you wanted to see in a live Action Movie I can't see Sentinel Prime or Crosshairs being in very many people's top tens for example.

I just wonder if they were to say for example use Quintessons would they be odd creatures indeed - would people even be happy to see the consumer electronics/ Military & security themes of the cartoon in live action form or are those ideas as old hat now as "Lasercores" (instead of Sparks).

I don't object to some version of a Quintesson origin - I just wonder if they have the sensitivity to handle it well in live action form.

If you turn them into tentacle creatures they could be flippin' terrifying. but they'd also be unable to be the sort of character to sustain much dialogue (I wonder if they regret removing Lockdown now as he'd have been good to keep around as a go between).

I foresee if they do go that route of "Transformers in Space" in a little bit - and they do use Quintessons then it will be tricky as heck to get right. (well it's a Live action movie so they won't get it right) so instead I will hope that then embarrass themselves as little as possible when striving for the lowest common denominator again.

I would rather have something like a Movie version of Sky Lynx used as Comic relief than some human "unfunny" comedian though.

I have heard rumours of the series moving towards a space theme and eventually Unicron - but I hope they don't try to do that to quickly - best to leave people hanging a bit on that like Marvel does with Thanos.

As to the idea of where to get Movie rumours from I have found this account on Twitter useful at times in the past : @TFLAMB

Or the related website :

http://transformerslive.blogspot.co.uk/ ... um=twitter
Re: TRANSFORMERS 5: Mark Wahlberg Thinks Michael Bay Will Direct (1725385)
Posted by NiteStar on September 11th, 2015 @ 12:43am CDT
There are probably threads already but thought I'd share anyway.

Source:Yahoo News
It looks as though ‘Transformers 5’ is going to pull out the big guns… as voice actor Mark Ryan spills the beans on what we can expect.
Image
During an appearance at Wings and Wheels UK (via Christian Post), the 59-year-old voice actor (who voiced Lockdown in ‘Age of Extinction’), revealed everything he knows about the movie’s plot so far.

“He explained that the film is undergoing dual directions,” they said. “He said that the first will focus on Cade and Co. With that, fans predicted that ‘Transformers 5’ will be centered around having the Autobots on earth.”
“The plan is to have Cade Yeager (Mark Wahlberg) and the Dinobots - with a few Autobots thrown in for good measure - assemble to tackle an impending threat on Earth,” expanded the folks at CBM. “[At the same time,] Optimus Prime will head into outer space to hunt down the creators of his race, the Quintessons, something which will see him reportedly meet up with Unicron.”
Image
If you ask me, that sounds like an awful lot to pack into one movie… but with a huge character such as Unicron just casually dropped in there, this could be the ‘Transformers’ movie we’ve all been waiting for.
Image
Of course, there are also rumours that Paramount Pictures is seeking to expand the Transformers franchise by creating a number of spin-offs… and Mark Ryan even has a hint about which direction they’ll go.

“The franchise plans to reinvent the brand of the movie adaptations to focus more on the transformers, as opposed to the human character present,” he apparently explained.

Now, this is all just rumours and speculation, but it could mean that Paramount is looking to focus each ‘Transformers’ spin-off on a particular robotic character – much like the Avengers solo films follow their respective heroes.

And if you ask me, that makes a lot of sense.

Whether or not it will prove to be a ‘Transformers’ overload for fans of the series remains to be seen… But either way, it sounds as though there are a lot more Autobots and Decepticons heading our way.

‘Transformers 5’ heads to cinemas sometime in 2017.
Re: TRANSFORMERS 5: Mark Wahlberg Thinks Michael Bay Will Direct (1725387)
Posted by Hellscream9999 on September 11th, 2015 @ 12:52am CDT
So by 'the movie we've been waiting for' you mean the one that ruins the most epic, awe-inspiring, transformers character ever? Unicron should only be utilized if the writers know how to write a movie script, and have an understanding of the character, and what he means to not only himself, but the movie universe.

I thought the wrathful version of prime was very well done, and obviously, the '86 movie's Unicron forever changed me. To see this ultimate evil casually sh&t upon in this movie is going to be as painful as seeing the great 'Fallen' sh&t on :BANG_HEAD:

Hopefully the several dozen of competent (?) writers they amassed for these movies can bring them out of the sewer.
Re: TRANSFORMERS 5: Mark Wahlberg Thinks Michael Bay Will Direct (1725392)
Posted by Burn on September 11th, 2015 @ 1:42am CDT
Sounds like fan wank to me. >:oP
Re: TRANSFORMERS 5: Mark Wahlberg Thinks Michael Bay Will Direct (1725393)
Posted by Hellscream9999 on September 11th, 2015 @ 1:55am CDT
Burn wrote:Sounds like fan wank to me. >:oP


Keep tellin' yourself that, I'm sure it'll keep them from ruining Unicron >:oP
Re: TRANSFORMERS 5: Mark Wahlberg Thinks Michael Bay Will Direct (1725397)
Posted by NiteStar on September 11th, 2015 @ 2:51am CDT
Well even if any of this is true or not the part I find funny is that its taken then 8-9 years to make decide to make a transformers movie about transformers rather than about Sam getting his car, Sam getting a girlfriend, Sam going to college, Sam getting a job. Its like duh, what are y'all waiting for?! And then all the families and friends and Military involvement. I only give good credit to the first movie cuz it was a great introduction and setup to the story and franchise and I did have high hopes at the time BUT then it just fell off from there after that. Each one just got worse and worse until this last one with Mark Wahlberg was just forgettable story-wsie. If anything I hope is true that we see less and less humans and more focused plot-centered TF lore. Wether it be G1 or not ...lets go to friggin' Cyberton goddam it! Just once! F*** all this BS already! :BANG_HEAD: 8-| /:)
Re: TRANSFORMERS 5: Mark Wahlberg Thinks Michael Bay Will Direct (1725462)
Posted by Sabrblade on September 11th, 2015 @ 11:01am CDT
Oh dear. Anyone wanna take a little trip with me to see how far professional Internet journalism has fallen? :P

The Yahoo! News article links to an article at Christian Post Entertainment on the "Wings and Wheels UK" event that Mark Ryan supposedly revealed these TF5 plot points at. Let's set this aside for now.

The Yahoo! News article also links to Comic Book Movie as the source of the Quintesson/Unicron plot, who in turn link to Dark Horizons as their source, who then link to Parent Herald (and to MovieWeb, who also links back to Parent Herald), who finally then links all the way back to Christian Post Entertainment... except that CPE does NOT mention the Quintesson/Unicron plot at all.

So where did the Quintesson/Unicron plot idea originate from? Well, let's head over to looking at yet another site, a TF fansite, where user Olivus Prime gives his own report from this Wings and Wheels UK event:
This year's Wings and Wheels (a motoring and airshow event at Dunsfold Aerodrome in the UK) has taken place over this weekend, and I was pleasantly surprised to meet Mark Ryan there, who was a guest with Transformers Car Hire. As I've heard, he was an incredibly polite and enthusiastic chap who chatted to me for a fair amount of time about his experience on the Transformers movies. Some of the stuff he mentioned to me I didn't know of before, so I thought I'd share it:
  • Jetfire - Apparently he based this performance upon his friend Ray Winstone. When Winstone saw the film, he called Mark and said he owed him a beer.
  • Lockdown - Mark talked about the improvisation he's allowed to do on set, and Lockdown was a case in point of this. Before shooting, Mark was pondering how to approach the character, when he saw a Jaguar advert in his hotel room that acted as inspiration for the voice. Apparently when he then used it in the dock scene when Ratchet is killed, his voice echoed around the docks (sounding like "the voice of God"!) and everyone was in awe. His facial expressions were also a big influence upon the character, especially in the "You think you were born" scene.
  • Upcoming sequels - I don't really follow this much so I don't know if this is new, but he said filming for TF5 ought to start next year and that the films will follow two directions now, one of which focusses upon Cade and co.
This report seems to confirm that Mark Ryan did at least say something about the next movie going in two directions, but nothing is said of any Quintesson/Unicron plot in his report (and something like that is not something that a fan would want to keep undisclosed if it was officially said at a public event).

...But there sure is plenty of fan speculation about the Quints and Uni all over the Internet, particularly on TF fansites like this one and that one.


So, to make a long story short, it would appear that a ton of credible news sites created articles based on unfounded speculation originating from the wishful thinking of fans. That is some pretty bad journalism. >:oP
Re: TRANSFORMERS 5: Mark Wahlberg Thinks Michael Bay Will Direct (1725470)
Posted by Hellscream9999 on September 11th, 2015 @ 12:06pm CDT
Sabrblade wrote:So, to make a long story short, it would appear that a ton of credible news sites created articles based on unfounded speculation originating from the wishful thinking of fans. That is some pretty bad journalism. >:oP


Image
Re: TRANSFORMERS 5: Mark Wahlberg Thinks Michael Bay Will Direct (1725478)
Posted by Sabrblade on September 11th, 2015 @ 12:30pm CDT
And, BLAMMO! The good folks at Unicron.com have personally reached out to Mark Ryan himself to ask him about these rumors - https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=10153206957464912&id=317740274911
Many sites are misquoting Mark Ryan as having talked about Transformers 5 plot (including our beloved UNICRON...) at a "recent UK convention." We reached out to our friend, Mr. Mark Ryan who voiced Bumblebee in 1, Jetfire in RotF and Lockdown in AoE. We asked him if he really said any of the things that are being reported. His response:

"Hey mate! I didn't give an official interview or even mention Unicron. I was misquoted from a casual chat with a fan and the Internet did the rest! I have no idea what the story will be or who/what's in it. It's all secret..."

So, as we suspected the Unicron/Quintesson/Dinobot rumors are nothing more than fanboy wishlists, fabricated to get attract attention.
Re: TRANSFORMERS 5: Mark Wahlberg Thinks Michael Bay Will Direct (1725593)
Posted by Burn on September 11th, 2015 @ 5:02pm CDT
Told you. Fan wank. >:oP
Re: TRANSFORMERS 5: Mark Wahlberg Thinks Michael Bay Will Direct (1725621)
Posted by NiteStar on September 11th, 2015 @ 7:47pm CDT
Sabrblade wrote:And, BLAMMO! The good folks at Unicron.com have personally reached out to Mark Ryan himself to ask him about these rumors - https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=10153206957464912&id=317740274911
Many sites are misquoting Mark Ryan as having talked about Transformers 5 plot (including our beloved UNICRON...) at a "recent UK convention." We reached out to our friend, Mr. Mark Ryan who voiced Bumblebee in 1, Jetfire in RotF and Lockdown in AoE. We asked him if he really said any of the things that are being reported. His response:

"Hey mate! I didn't give an official interview or even mention Unicron. I was misquoted from a casual chat with a fan and the Internet did the rest! I have no idea what the story will be or who/what's in it. It's all secret..."

So, as we suspected the Unicron/Quintesson/Dinobot rumors are nothing more than fanboy wishlists, fabricated to get attract attention.


Well I hope none of this is directed at me. Im just sharing info I found. I have no clue what could be true or not.
But this sucks. I almost dont even want them to make another movie if its just going to be more of what we've been already getting.
I want to see them in space the whole time with just Transformers as the characters with very little human story.
Ive been disappointed thus far so I dont have much hope for it, at least not at this current time.
Re: TRANSFORMERS 5: Mark Wahlberg Thinks Michael Bay Will Direct (1725634)
Posted by Hellscream9999 on September 11th, 2015 @ 9:27pm CDT
NiteStar wrote:
Sabrblade wrote:And, BLAMMO! The good folks at Unicron.com have personally reached out to Mark Ryan himself to ask him about these rumors - https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=10153206957464912&id=317740274911
Many sites are misquoting Mark Ryan as having talked about Transformers 5 plot (including our beloved UNICRON...) at a "recent UK convention." We reached out to our friend, Mr. Mark Ryan who voiced Bumblebee in 1, Jetfire in RotF and Lockdown in AoE. We asked him if he really said any of the things that are being reported. His response:

"Hey mate! I didn't give an official interview or even mention Unicron. I was misquoted from a casual chat with a fan and the Internet did the rest! I have no idea what the story will be or who/what's in it. It's all secret..."

So, as we suspected the Unicron/Quintesson/Dinobot rumors are nothing more than fanboy wishlists, fabricated to get attract attention.


Well I hope none of this is directed at me. Im just sharing info I found. I have no clue what could be true or not.
But this sucks. I almost dont even want them to make another movie if its just going to be more of what we've been already getting.
I want to see them in space the whole time with just Transformers as the characters with very little human story.
Ive been disappointed thus far so I dont have much hope for it, at least not at this current time.


Do you realize how obtusely expensive that would be to fund and direct? Not only would it have SW prequel syndrome (everything on green screen, so no realism) but the cost to create, animate, and render the movie would be so egregiously high that it would never get the green light - there are other reasons for all the gratuitous product placement in aoe >:oP
Re: TRANSFORMERS 5: Mark Wahlberg Thinks Michael Bay Will Direct (1725636)
Posted by Sabrblade on September 11th, 2015 @ 9:29pm CDT
What would they need to film on green screen for such a movie? Everything would be in space and the TFs are all CGI anyway, so there wouldn't be anything real to film against a green screen.
Re: TRANSFORMERS 5: Mark Wahlberg Thinks Michael Bay Will Direct (1725641)
Posted by Hellscream9999 on September 11th, 2015 @ 9:39pm CDT
Sabrblade wrote:What would they need to film on green screen for such a movie? Everything would be in space and the TFs are all CGI anyway, so there wouldn't be anything real to film against a green screen.


Well, it can be done with a computer, I guess the graphics for the objects/debris would be very realistic/high-res, which would lead to higher cost and render time >:oP
Re: TRANSFORMERS 5: Mark Wahlberg Thinks Michael Bay Will Direct (1725951)
Posted by NiteStar on September 13th, 2015 @ 6:21am CDT
Hellscream9999 wrote:Do you realize how obtusely expensive that would be to fund and direct? Not only would it have SW prequel syndrome (everything on green screen, so no realism) but the cost to create, animate, and render the movie would be so egregiously high that it would never get the green light - there are other reasons for all the gratuitous product placement in aoe >:oP


Ok ok maybe 6 or 7 years ago that may have been the case but after 4 films already all making close up to 1 billion a pop each?.....we cant use that excuse anymore. They have made all the money in the world off these movies. They can afford to do a full live action CGI by now. And I think that the public deserves it. I mean thats what all this has been for right? For the idea to actually one day do that. Or we wanna keep making more "Sam and family go to college" and FBI movies..? nuh-uh... /:)
Nope, nope, they can do it. They can take us to Cybertron and have a full-fledged Transformers movie, and if they cant by this alleged next movie then the whole film franchise is a sham.
Re: TRANSFORMERS 5: Mark Wahlberg Thinks Michael Bay Will Direct (1725955)
Posted by Burn on September 13th, 2015 @ 6:50am CDT
You can throw as much "realistic" CGI as you like onto a movie screen, but it still needs a descent story to drive it, and that's been gradually getting worse with each movie.

Some of the best films out there are done without special effects and the reason they're considered one of the best is the well crafted storyline.
Re: TRANSFORMERS 5: Mark Wahlberg Thinks Michael Bay Will Direct (1725971)
Posted by Sabrblade on September 13th, 2015 @ 10:00am CDT
In a way, the Predacons Rising movie we got for TF: Prime kinda feels like a response to all the fanboy wishes that keep being asked for future live action movies.

I mean, how often have we seen posts from people wanting the next TF movie to have any of the following:
  • Unicron
  • A story set entirely on Cybertron
  • No humans
  • Full focus on the robots
  • Completely CGI
  • Less Optimus Prime
  • Less Megatron
  • More characterization for the non-Optimus/non-Megatron robots
  • Megatron being upgraded into a form that's not still named "Megatron"
  • Bumblebee to talk permanently
  • No toilet humor
  • No excessive crudeness in general
  • No Michael Bay
We hear these kinds of fan wishes all the time, and Predacons Rising delivered in just 65 minutes all of what four feature-liength live action films failed to deliver (not that we should have been expecting any of that for the live action films, mind you).

I think the only things missing from this list that fans have also asked for in the past are the Dinobots and that Megatron's upgraded form is named "Galvatron", both of which were at least fulfilled by AOE (regardless of how underwhelming or not they were).

But since Predacons Rising did do so much of what fans have asked for over the years, it almost seems like Predacons Rising was made to fulfill all of those fan desires in one go, so as to proverbially give the filmmakers some kind of excuse to not need to do so in the live action films, as they now could just point at Preds Rising and say something like "You fans already got a movie with all that stuff you wanted in it, we don't need to make you another one."
Re: TRANSFORMERS 5: Mark Wahlberg Thinks Michael Bay Will Direct (1726240)
Posted by Rodimus Prime on September 14th, 2015 @ 8:34pm CDT
Sabrblade wrote:In a way, the Predacons Rising movie we got for TF: Prime kinda feels like a response to all the fanboy wishes that keep being asked for future live action movies.
I don't think those 2 are comparable. Predacons Rising was fine for what it was, the ending to a TV series. The live action movies are different, and if all the elements you listed were included in those films, it would be a huge improvement. However, I think it's too late now to do that. If it had been done in RoTF, it would have been alright, but after the disaster that was RoTF, not even a total reboot (as long as it was set in the same world/storyline) could save the continuity. AoE proved that very well. Instead of getting new human main characters, they should have minimized the humans' presence and focused entirely on the Transformers. They did a good job on toning down on the military aspect, but it was still way too human-centric.
Re: TRANSFORMERS 5: Mark Wahlberg Thinks Michael Bay Will Direct (1726273)
Posted by Autobot032 on September 14th, 2015 @ 10:44pm CDT
Rodimus Prime wrote:
Sabrblade wrote:In a way, the Predacons Rising movie we got for TF: Prime kinda feels like a response to all the fanboy wishes that keep being asked for future live action movies.
I don't think those 2 are comparable. Predacons Rising was fine for what it was, the ending to a TV series. The live action movies are different, and if all the elements you listed were included in those films, it would be a huge improvement. However, I think it's too late now to do that. If it had been done in RoTF, it would have been alright, but after the disaster that was RoTF, not even a total reboot (as long as it was set in the same world/storyline) could save the continuity. AoE proved that very well. Instead of getting new human main characters, they should have minimized the humans' presence and focused entirely on the Transformers. They did a good job on toning down on the military aspect, but it was still way too human-centric.


It has to be somewhat human-centric, though. The average audience member doesn't give a crap about the Transformers themselves. My Dad's proof of that. He laughed when Optimus destroyed the fountain in the first movie, but Sam and his stupidity was what really helped him connect to the film. Same with Sam's parents in ROTF.

The humans are more of a comedic bit, really and that's what draws people in in these rather dark and overwrought films.

You go full 100% Transformers in a film and it'll crash and burn. With relentless explosions and alien jargon/technobabble for 2+ hours, critics will pan it in a heartbeat, the box office will suffer through word of mouth and Paramount will be all like "Yeah...we're not doing that again. The next one? MORE humans, please!"

The regular audience just isn't ready for Transformers yet. Mixed in, sure, but full on TF wall to wall? Nah. That level of love died out in the '80s. Unless you're a hardcore fan (most of us are), you're going to want the human element in the film because you can't connect to the Transformers themselves.

That, of course, has to do with the writing, but it is what it is. FWIW...I loved Cade and his family. I could connect better with a hopeless goofball with a good heart trying to protect his kid, more than I could some lucky teenager who just so happened to be fated to Optimus Prime....somehow.

AoE was more realistic and asked better questions than the previous movies did. There's no cube of life out there, there's no giant sun killing laser hidden inside the pyramids, there's no spacebridge bringing another planet into our orbit, but a company killing for money and using the knowledge to play God while a hardworking single Dad just wants to save his family? That I can identify with.

That we can all understand. Technology is getting scarier, we have machines that could turn on us and kill us in an instant given the right circumstances, so the question of "should we?" has been asked and answered in AoE, while the other three just kinda went on with BOOM BOOM BOOBS BOOM "One shall stand, one shall fall!" BOOM BOOM GRATUITOUS BUTT SHOT BOOM BOOM.
Re: TRANSFORMERS 5: Mark Wahlberg Thinks Michael Bay Will Direct (1726328)
Posted by Rodimus Prime on September 15th, 2015 @ 7:03am CDT
I wasn't trying to say they shouldn't be in the movies at all. Maybe I phrased it wrong. I meant to say that the main story should be about the Transformers themselves, with humans as peripheral characters, or perhaps as villains, like it was in AoE with Cemetery Wind, and even Dylan Gould in DoTM. I liked those characters. I understand about the general audience needing characters to relate to that aren't giant robots, but I always had a little problem with that: the title of the movie is TRANSFORMERS. The brand had been around for 23 years when the 1st film came out, so people knew of it. So even if there weren't main human characters to relate to, the movie would have done well. Maybe not $800 million well, but well. And I guess that's what everything comes down to. $$$
Re: TRANSFORMERS 5: Mark Wahlberg Thinks Michael Bay Will Direct (1726353)
Posted by Sabrblade on September 15th, 2015 @ 9:43am CDT
Rodimus Prime wrote:Predacons Rising was fine for what it was, the ending to a TV series.
"Deadlock" was the show's ending. Preds Rising was an epilogue made after the fact.

Rodimus Prime wrote:The live action movies are different,
Not every fan feels this way. There's a huge chunk of the fandom that has the mentality of "If a cartoon or comic can be done so well then why not the same for the live action movies?" I'm not claiming to be part of this crowd, but with how Preds Rising happened to contain so many of the elements fans desired to see in the live action films, it feels as though Hasbro only made that TV movie to throw the fans a bone and put all those wants to rest since they don't seem to want to put any of that fan-desired stuff into the live action films.[/quote]

Rodimus Prime wrote:and if all the elements you listed were included in those films, it would be a huge improvement.
In theory, perhaps. But while the end result could turn out to essentially be a live action retelling of the 1986 G1 movie (which a huge portion of the fandom has been asking for), there's very little chance that such a movie would be even come close to being as commercially successful as the four films we've gotten so far. And such a film would most assuredly be just as panned by the critics as, well, the 1986 movie itself was.

Rodimus Prime wrote:However, I think it's too late now to do that. If it had been done in RoTF, it would have been alright, but after the disaster that was RoTF, not even a total reboot (as long as it was set in the same world/storyline) could save the continuity. AoE proved that very well. Instead of getting new human main characters, they should have minimized the humans' presence and focused entirely on the Transformers. They did a good job on toning down on the military aspect, but it was still way too human-centric.
This point is in agreement with the points I was making.

But as Autobot032 said, the general moviegoing audience isn't ready for a movie with the TFs as the stars instead of some human actor in the lead. We fans wish it could be that way, but non-fans don't agree with us.
Re: TRANSFORMERS 5: Mark Wahlberg Thinks Michael Bay Will Direct (1726372)
Posted by Autobot032 on September 15th, 2015 @ 11:42am CDT
Rodimus Prime wrote:I wasn't trying to say they shouldn't be in the movies at all. Maybe I phrased it wrong. I meant to say that the main story should be about the Transformers themselves, with humans as peripheral characters, or perhaps as villains, like it was in AoE with Cemetery Wind, and even Dylan Gould in DoTM. I liked those characters. I understand about the general audience needing characters to relate to that aren't giant robots, but I always had a little problem with that: the title of the movie is TRANSFORMERS. The brand had been around for 23 years when the 1st film came out, so people knew of it. So even if there weren't main human characters to relate to, the movie would have done well. Maybe not $800 million well, but well. And I guess that's what everything comes down to. $$$


The thing is, this situation is like that video that was posted roughly around the same time the first film came out, "They Were Always Real To Me" is what it's called, the title fits our situation. Transformers were always a big deal to us, but then they weren't. A quick history lesson, for everyone, including myself:

Action Masters have their spot in a few collections here and there, but technically the last fully transformable line of figure was the end of Transformers for most people. Then it just died. Comics, show, toys, all of it gone. So if it was gone for us, imagine how much of it escaped the mind of the average American (or anyone worldwide, really).

G2 tried to revive it, show, comics, toys, all of it. It barely registered, really. Fans snapped them up as fast as they could, as garish as the colors were, it was G1 dang it, and we were going to have it! The "remastered" show caught a few people's attention, along the lines of "I remember that show. WTF did they do to it? I don't remember that cube thing. This is stupid." Not a good start. The comics only lasted a year and we didn't get a single figure of the new characters. It took 20+ years to get a Jhiaxus figure and he's not even the right color, or size.

It wasn't until Jurassic Park that Hasbro had the bright idea of Transformers + animals and bugs = big seller! come to mind. Now, that started to bring TFs back to the forefront, but it wasn't in the public's consciousness, not much, at least. It would be another decade before the general public took notice.

News stations around the country (I was, in fact, the first person to report on it. I saw a snippet about it on WEWS out of Cleveland and reported it to The ALLSpark back when I was a member there.) "Paramount pictures says they're bringing the 1980's cartoon and toyline Transformers to life on the big screen. The live action film will be the first of it's kind for the series. They're hoping to release the movie sometime in 2006, according to sources."

And then nothing for months, some of the fandom even forgot we were getting a movie, for a little while. Then out of the blue, leaked script and it divided the fandom. The film was never going to be ready for '06, so Summer '07, here we come. Trailers started popping up, the reaction wasn't a positive one. "That looks like a skeletal Cliffjumper! Why is he attacking the Mars rover?! WHO WRITES THIS?!"

People saw the name Michael Bay attached and thought "Oh no! It's going to be Bad Boys with Transformers in it! Noooooo!" Then it came out, people saw it and it turned into a sleeper hit. Made a good chunk of change here, and surprised everyone worldwide with a 700+ million dollar take. Couldn't keep the toys in stock, Transformers finally made it back to the mainstream and into the public consciousness.

It worked because it had never been done before. It worked because the juvenile humor registered with everyone.

Then another lull, so Animated could come along, we quickly saw how fast the general audience's attention span shrinks. Then comes 2009's ROTF. "They're making another one? Cool! I'll go see it!" and we saw what happened there. Critics hated it. Fans hated it. Audiences hated it. Yet it made 800+ million and beat the first film by quite a bit.

Another lull, another waiting period for the next film. In the meantime, the only publicity was bad publicity. Shia LeBeouf couldn't keep his head out of his ass for 10 seconds and caused a bunch of trouble. Bar fights, getting arrested at Walgreens, public intoxication, running his mouth, etc.

Then DOTM comes along in 2011 and this time it's in 3D and people said "Well, because it's 3D, I'll give it a shot, I guess." and they sure did. First of the series to break through the billion dollar threshold and then some. People just could not stop watching this movie because the visuals and the 3D just blew 'em away. But critics and fans were harsh and said it was overblown and they pretty much hated it.

THREE year hiatus. The general public moves onto other films and see things like Star Trek Into Darkness, read up on Star Wars coming back after 30 years, Ridley Scott's attempt to go into the history of Aliens, etc. Then...out of nowhere (for them, not us) Bay brings us Age Of Extinction.

"Aw, not another one of these..." But wait...there's Kelsey Grammer! Stanley Tucci?! JOHN FRIGGIN' GOODMAN?! Oh and uh...Marky Mark? Really? Eh, okay. Final verdict? "3D wasn't that good, the visuals are their best yet, the cast is somewhat likable but tries too hard and makes me miss Shia! Oh and it's too loud and way too long." Still ends up beating DOTM at the box office and surpasses it's billion dollar take.

Now we're in another hiatus and news places are reporting Robert The Walking Dead Kirkman among other very talented creators sitting in a room working on the next script and we hear that Paramount's plan is to create a MCU type of deal but for Transformers. General consensus? "Reboot the whole thing! Or better yet, let it die!"

So, if it's in the public, it's a negative image at the moment. As the next 2 of 3 years burn away until the next film, they'll forget more and more. They'll cringe at the thought of another 2.75 hour flick that seemingly does nothing but have explosions and weird looking robots beating the crap out of each other. Not to mention "Oh, great. This one contradicts the other films even more than the other ones did! Now none of it makes sense! Who writes this crap?!"

Heck, even the toys suffered a bit. Fatigue set in and a lot of stores just don't stock 'em like they used to. People don't buy them like they used to. People come to laugh at Shia, John Tuturro, John Goodman and Mark Wahlberg, they happen to look at the CGI eye candy too, but they could do without 'em for the most part, probably.

With the writing being handled as it has been, with the films being a whole bunch of explosives, with the general audience having the attention span of a gnat with ADD, having a Transformers-centric film won't work and certainly won't make enough money to recover the investment. Look at Disney, for example. Big name stars, big pricetags, HUGE failures. They're still recovering from John Carter, and it'll be a while before the sting of The Lone Ranger goes away.

The problem is partially the audience, it's partially the filmmakers, but whatever it is, the world just isn't ready for a Transformers only film. It's just not going to work, no matter how much we wish it would. And right now, what is everyone talking about? The massive success that is Jurassic World and it's well deserved, too. A fun romp from beginning to end and made everyone feel like a kid again, like we were back in 1993, just with prettier people doing the running and screaming thing. Star Wars is coming at Christmas, everyone's losing their minds. Transformers? No one's talking about it. Heck, half the time, the movies are only mentioned so people can say "Oh, I saw that pile of $#!7, it sucked!"

Sad, but true. People aren't enlightened and Transformers aren't enlightening. Nothing you can do, really.

Sabrblade wrote:
Rodimus Prime wrote:Predacons Rising was fine for what it was, the ending to a TV series.
"Deadlock" was the show's ending. Preds Rising was an epilogue made after the fact.


I also feel Deadlock was the defacto finale. I feel like Rising was tacked on just because. It wasn't the best writing and it felt hollow and boring to me. Optimus and Wheeljack floating around in space, Starscream beating on Predacons because he could and Autobots fighting...what? I mean, there was nothing particularly special about it and it was ridiculously short. Not even worth my time or effort, really. (And I'm not the only fan who feels that way.)

Transformers Prime was excellent. Prime Beast Hunters was Prime dying a not so great death. Predacons Rising was taking a dump on a once great show's grave.
Re: TRANSFORMERS 5: Mark Wahlberg Thinks Michael Bay Will Direct (1726386)
Posted by Hellscream9999 on September 15th, 2015 @ 12:51pm CDT
Autobot032 wrote:The thing is, this situation is like that video that was posted roughly around the same time the first film came out, "They Were Always Real To Me" is what it's called, the title fits our situation. Transformers were always a big deal to us, but then they weren't. A quick history lesson, for everyone, including myself:

Action Masters have their spot in a few collections here and there, but technically the last fully transformable line of figure was the end of Transformers for most people. Then it just died. Comics, show, toys, all of it gone. So if it was gone for us, imagine how much of it escaped the mind of the average American (or anyone worldwide, really).

G2 tried to revive it, show, comics, toys, all of it. It barely registered, really. Fans snapped them up as fast as they could, as garish as the colors were, it was G1 dang it, and we were going to have it! The "remastered" show caught a few people's attention, along the lines of "I remember that show. WTF did they do to it? I don't remember that cube thing. This is stupid." Not a good start. The comics only lasted a year and we didn't get a single figure of the new characters. It took 20+ years to get a Jhiaxus figure and he's not even the right color, or size.

It wasn't until Jurassic Park that Hasbro had the bright idea of Transformers + animals and bugs = big seller! come to mind. Now, that started to bring TFs back to the forefront, but it wasn't in the public's consciousness, not much, at least. It would be another decade before the general public took notice.

News stations around the country (I was, in fact, the first person to report on it. I saw a snippet about it on WEWS out of Cleveland and reported it to The ALLSpark back when I was a member there.) "Paramount pictures says they're bringing the 1980's cartoon and toyline Transformers to life on the big screen. The live action film will be the first of it's kind for the series. They're hoping to release the movie sometime in 2006, according to sources."

And then nothing for months, some of the fandom even forgot we were getting a movie, for a little while. Then out of the blue, leaked script and it divided the fandom. The film was never going to be ready for '06, so Summer '07, here we come. Trailers started popping up, the reaction wasn't a positive one. "That looks like a skeletal Cliffjumper! Why is he attacking the Mars rover?! WHO WRITES THIS?!"

People saw the name Michael Bay attached and thought "Oh no! It's going to be Bad Boys with Transformers in it! Noooooo!" Then it came out, people saw it and it turned into a sleeper hit. Made a good chunk of change here, and surprised everyone worldwide with a 700+ million dollar take. Couldn't keep the toys in stock, Transformers finally made it back to the mainstream and into the public consciousness.

It worked because it had never been done before. It worked because the juvenile humor registered with everyone.

Then another lull, so Animated could come along, we quickly saw how fast the general audience's attention span shrinks. Then comes 2009's ROTF. "They're making another one? Cool! I'll go see it!" and we saw what happened there. Critics hated it. Fans hated it. Audiences hated it. Yet it made 800+ million and beat the first film by quite a bit.

Another lull, another waiting period for the next film. In the meantime, the only publicity was bad publicity. Shia LeBeouf couldn't keep his head out of his ass for 10 seconds and caused a bunch of trouble. Bar fights, getting arrested at Walgreens, public intoxication, running his mouth, etc.

Then DOTM comes along in 2011 and this time it's in 3D and people said "Well, because it's 3D, I'll give it a shot, I guess." and they sure did. First of the series to break through the billion dollar threshold and then some. People just could not stop watching this movie because the visuals and the 3D just blew 'em away. But critics and fans were harsh and said it was overblown and they pretty much hated it.

THREE year hiatus. The general public moves onto other films and see things like Star Trek Into Darkness, read up on Star Wars coming back after 30 years, Ridley Scott's attempt to go into the history of Aliens, etc. Then...out of nowhere (for them, not us) Bay brings us Age Of Extinction.

"Aw, not another one of these..." But wait...there's Kelsey Grammer! Stanley Tucci?! JOHN FRIGGIN' GOODMAN?! Oh and uh...Marky Mark? Really? Eh, okay. Final verdict? "3D wasn't that good, the visuals are their best yet, the cast is somewhat likable but tries too hard and makes me miss Shia! Oh and it's too loud and way too long." Still ends up beating DOTM at the box office and surpasses it's billion dollar take.

Now we're in another hiatus and news places are reporting Robert The Walking Dead Kirkman among other very talented creators sitting in a room working on the next script and we hear that Paramount's plan is to create a MCU type of deal but for Transformers. General consensus? "Reboot the whole thing! Or better yet, let it die!"

So, if it's in the public, it's a negative image at the moment. As the next 2 of 3 years burn away until the next film, they'll forget more and more. They'll cringe at the thought of another 2.75 hour flick that seemingly does nothing but have explosions and weird looking robots beating the crap out of each other. Not to mention "Oh, great. This one contradicts the other films even more than the other ones did! Now none of it makes sense! Who writes this crap?!"

Heck, even the toys suffered a bit. Fatigue set in and a lot of stores just don't stock 'em like they used to. People don't buy them like they used to. People come to laugh at Shia, John Tuturro, John Goodman and Mark Wahlberg, they happen to look at the CGI eye candy too, but they could do without 'em for the most part, probably.

With the writing being handled as it has been, with the films being a whole bunch of explosives, with the general audience having the attention span of a gnat with ADD, having a Transformers-centric film won't work and certainly won't make enough money to recover the investment. Look at Disney, for example. Big name stars, big pricetags, HUGE failures. They're still recovering from John Carter, and it'll be a while before the sting of The Lone Ranger goes away.

The problem is partially the audience, it's partially the filmmakers, but whatever it is, the world just isn't ready for a Transformers only film. It's just not going to work, no matter how much we wish it would. And right now, what is everyone talking about? The massive success that is Jurassic World and it's well deserved, too. A fun romp from beginning to end and made everyone feel like a kid again, like we were back in 1993, just with prettier people doing the running and screaming thing. Star Wars is coming at Christmas, everyone's losing their minds. Transformers? No one's talking about it. Heck, half the time, the movies are only mentioned so people can say "Oh, I saw that pile of $#!7, it sucked!"

Sad, but true. People aren't enlightened and Transformers aren't enlightening. Nothing you can do, really.

Sabrblade wrote:
Rodimus Prime wrote:Predacons Rising was fine for what it was, the ending to a TV series.
"Deadlock" was the show's ending. Preds Rising was an epilogue made after the fact.


I also feel Deadlock was the defacto finale. I feel like Rising was tacked on just because. It wasn't the best writing and it felt hollow and boring to me. Optimus and Wheeljack floating around in space, Starscream beating on Predacons because he could and Autobots fighting...what? I mean, there was nothing particularly special about it and it was ridiculously short. Not even worth my time or effort, really. (And I'm not the only fan who feels that way.)

Transformers Prime was excellent. Prime Beast Hunters was Prime dying a not so great death. Predacons Rising was taking a dump on a once great show's grave.


This. Also, am I the only one who was disappointed Unicron didn't absolutely murder all of the :BOT:'s, I mean, come on, it's UNICRON, he shoulda killed at least one of them, and make him seem like a threat, I mean, bulkhead and all of them don't show up again in rid, so they could have been killed and upped the emotional stakes >:oP
Re: TRANSFORMERS 5: Mark Wahlberg Thinks Michael Bay Will Direct (1726390)
Posted by Rodimus Prime on September 15th, 2015 @ 1:32pm CDT
Sabrblade wrote:
Rodimus Prime wrote:Predacons Rising was fine for what it was, the ending to a TV series.
"Deadlock" was the show's ending. Preds Rising was an epilogue made after the fact.
OK, I saw the series only once, from start to finish, and the last thing I watched was Predacons Rising. It was the last released piece of the TV series with the Prime characters in it, so for me it was the ending.

Rodimus Prime wrote:The live action movies are different,
Not every fan feels this way. There's a huge chunk of the fandom that has the mentality of "If a cartoon or comic can be done so well then why not the same for the live action movies?" I'm not claiming to be part of this crowd, but with how Preds Rising happened to contain so many of the elements fans desired to see in the live action films, it feels as though Hasbro only made that TV movie to throw the fans a bone and put all those wants to rest since they don't seem to want to put any of that fan-desired stuff into the live action films.
What I'm saying is that the 2 don't mix. You can't apply the same to the live action films as you do to Predacons Rising, because then the Bay film would bomb. That's why they didn't do it. And claiming that Hasbro tried to appease fans by "giving" them what they gripe about not having in the Bay films (all the stuff on your previous list) with Predacons Rising is missing the point on Hasbro's part. They're just 2 different kinds of media, what works in 1 won't work in the other. If Hasbro really thought that would be satisfactory, I feel kind of insulted. Then again, as A032 said, most people aren't enlightened, so I guess for them it would work.

In the end, I agree with most of your points, (and I appreciate the impromptu TF history) I just wanted to pick on that little bit about the movies being total failures without humans at the center. They would be failures for studios financially, but I think creatively they would be superior. But that's just 1 fan's viewpoint.

And for the record, I saw each of the 4 bay films in theaters repeatedly, and own them all on DVD. So I'm not trying to be a hypocrite or anything. In theaters they were an amazing experience, all 4 of them. They were like sex for my eyes and ears. Unfortunately, after the euphoria of seeing giant robots on a giant screen wore off, I realized there wasn't much substance behind the style. here's hoping that will change with the next installment. And as a G1 and particularly a Rodimus fan, I would love to see a live version of the 1986 movie. Too bad it will never happen, it wouldn't be financially sound for a studio to support it. :(
Re: TRANSFORMERS 5: Mark Wahlberg Thinks Michael Bay Will Direct (1744588)
Posted by Prime Riblet on November 28th, 2015 @ 12:02pm CST
I just recently came to the realization that TF-5 will likely be the first live action film for the franchise that I will skip watching at a cinema. I am tired of having my time wasted. The movies, as far as storytelling, have gotten more crappy since the first movie in 2007. Granted, this is all opinion, but I really thought the first movie was a good all around movie. RotF was exciting in places. By DotM, things went to hell, and I haven't really cared since. I was so excited to see AoE, and it turned out to be a huge disappointment for me. So, I really feel the need to let my money do the talking at the box office this time around and not see TF-5 on the big screen.
Re: TRANSFORMERS 5: Mark Wahlberg Thinks Michael Bay Will Direct (1744964)
Posted by Rodimus Prime on November 30th, 2015 @ 2:46pm CST
Prime Riblet wrote:The movies, as far as storytelling, have gotten more crappy since the first movie in 2007. Granted, this is all opinion, but I really thought the first movie was a good all around movie. RotF was exciting in places. By DotM, things went to hell, and I haven't really cared since. I was so excited to see AoE, and it turned out to be a huge disappointment for me.
As you said, it's all opinion, but I thought that even with Megatron and Shockwave's mistreatment, DoTM was better than RoTF. RoTF was just a big, bloated mess with a few visual treats. And if in your opinion they progressively got worse, why did you look forward to AoE? Because of the new human cast?
So, I really feel the need to let my money do the talking at the box office this time around and not see TF-5 on the big screen.
I'm going to see it. These movies were made for the big screen, especially with a director like Bay in charge.
Re: TRANSFORMERS 5: Mark Wahlberg Thinks Michael Bay Will Direct (1745814)
Posted by RSDADDIMUS2 on December 4th, 2015 @ 6:37am CST
I enjoyed all of the films. AoE was probably my favorite in terms of visuals.The Creator storyline kind of confused me because of what was stated in the previous films,but I'm willing to see 5 in hopes that they'll make it all make sense...plus Transformers and explosions. What's not to love?? :-D :-D
Re: TRANSFORMERS 5: Mark Wahlberg Thinks Michael Bay Will Direct (1747959)
Posted by Stuartmaximus on December 14th, 2015 @ 1:43pm CST

Transformers and More @ The Seibertron Store

Visit our store on eBay
These are affiliate links. We may earn commissions when you purchase items or services through these links.
Visit shop.seibertron.com to buy "Transformers ROBOTS IN DISGUISE #7 Cvr A IDW Comics 2012 7A (CA)Griffith 220709A"
Transformers ROBOT ...
Visit shop.seibertron.com to buy "TRANSFORMERS #3 Cvr C 1:10 Image Comics 2023 1023IM387 3C (CA) Arocena"
TRANSFORMERS #3 Cv ...
Visit shop.seibertron.com to buy "Transformers WINDBLADE #7 RI 1:10 Vol 2 IDW Comics 2015 (CA) Zama"
Transformers WINDB ...
Visit shop.seibertron.com to buy "Transformers VALENTINE'S DAY SPECIAL RI 1:10 IDW Comics DEC190657 231010I"
Transformers VALEN ...
Visit shop.seibertron.com to buy "TRANSFORMERS #33 Cvr B IDW Comics 2021 MAY210466 33B (CA) Lloyd (W) Ruckley"
TRANSFORMERS #33 C ...
Visit shop.seibertron.com to buy "Transformers MOVIE PREQUEL #1 RE IDW Comics 2007 1RE Brian's Toys 230323"
Transformers MOVIE ...
Visit shop.seibertron.com to buy "TRANSFORMERS #8 Cvr E 1:50 Image Comics 2024 Skybound 0324IM294 8E (CA) Ezaceta"
NEW!
TRANSFORMERS #8 Cv ...
Visit shop.seibertron.com to buy "TRANSFORMERS GALAXIES #5 Cover B IDW Comics 2020 NOV190607 5B (CA)Pitre-Durocher"
TRANSFORMERS GALAX ...
Visit shop.seibertron.com to buy "TRANSFORMERS BEAST WARS #13 RI 1:10 IDW Comics 2022 DEC210545 13RI (CA) Griffin"
TRANSFORMERS BEAST ...
Visit shop.seibertron.com to buy "VOID RIVALS #7 Cvr B Image Comics 2024 0124IM327 7B (CA) Bellegarde (W) Kirkman"
VOID RIVALS #7 Cvr ...
Visit shop.seibertron.com to buy "TRANSFORMERS #14 Cover B IDW Comics 2019 BOLD NEW ERA 14B (CA) Tramontano"
TRANSFORMERS #14 C ...
Visit shop.seibertron.com to buy "THE TRANSFORMERS #4 1st ptg Marvel Comics 1985 (CA) Texeira (W) Salicrup 230915M"
THE TRANSFORMERS # ...
Visit shop.seibertron.com to buy "Transformers LAST BOT STANDING #4 Cvr B IDW Comics 2022 JUN221674 4B (CA) Zama"
Transformers LAST ...
Visit shop.seibertron.com to buy "THE TRANSFORMERS #70 Marvel Comics 1990 (W) Furman (A/CA) Wildman 230915E"
THE TRANSFORMERS # ...
* Price and quantities subject to change. Shipping costs, taxes and other fees not included in cost shown. Refer to listing for current price and availability.
Find the items above and thousands more at the Seibertron Store on eBay
Transformers Podcast: Twincast / Podcast #349 - Agent of Chaos
Twincast / Podcast #349:
"Agent of Chaos"
MP3 · iTunes · RSS · View · Discuss · Ask
Posted: Saturday, May 4th, 2024

Featured Products on Amazon.com

These are affiliate links. We may earn commissions when you purchase items or services through these links.
Buy "Transformers MPM-03 Movie 10th Anniversary Figure Bumblebee" on AMAZON
Buy "Transformers Generations Exclusive Cyber Battalion Class Shockwave Figure" on AMAZON
Buy "Transformers: Generations Power of The Primes Legends Class Roadtrap" on AMAZON
Buy "Transformers: Generations Power of The Primes Quintus Prime Prime Master" on AMAZON
Buy "Transformers Studio Series 09 Voyager Class Movie 2 Thundercracker" on AMAZON
Buy "Transformers: Generations Power of the Primes Titan Class Predaking" on AMAZON
Buy "Transformers Generations Power of The Primes Deluxe Class Blackwing" on AMAZON
Buy "Transformers Deluxe 20 Mercenary Action Figure" on AMAZON
Buy "Transformers Generations Leader Class Starscream Figure Action Figure" on AMAZON
Buy "Transformers Generations Titans Return Titan Master Terri-Bull" on AMAZON
Buy "Transformers Generations Combiner Wars Deluxe Class Decepticon Dragstrip Figure" on AMAZON
Buy "Transformers: The Last Knight Premier Edition Deluxe Bumblebee" on AMAZON