Robots in Disguise Combiner Force 3-Step Thunderhoof and Grimlock Sighted
Monday, January 23rd, 2017 1:42PM CST
Categories: Toy News, SightingsPosted by: D-Maximal_Primal Views: 26,521
Topic Options: View Discussion · Sign in or Join to reply
News Search
Got Transformers News? Let us know here!
Most Popular Transformers News
Most Recent Transformers News
Posted by RAR on January 23rd, 2017 @ 1:44pm CST
The new one with the new face mask !!!
-----
I'm interested to see what the new 3 steps are like the Bumblebee & Optimus are modified or new Mould and I wonder what Thunderhoof's hook is like in a practical sense.
I wonder if they'd make that shark that you can use as a bath toy ?
Posted by Sigma Magnus on January 23rd, 2017 @ 1:50pm CST
Posted by RAR on January 23rd, 2017 @ 1:52pm CST
Kurona wrote:... also, this conversation would probably better be suited to the thread actually dedicated to the animated series rather than the thread for it's toyline
Quite possibly - but that raises an interesting thought - why stop making the shows at all - just keep making them in blocks of 6 that tell a contained story - they can do that with Rescue Bots too and tie the mini-season into the theme of the toys.
The reason I was mentioning it in the 1st places was due to marketing of the toys - as I don't follow the show very closely so I'm mainly interested in it as a means as to how it's related to the Toyline and the way it's sold to us.
Posted by Jelze Bunnycat on January 23rd, 2017 @ 2:52pm CST
RAR wrote:I'm interested to see what the new 3 steps are like the Bumblebee & Optimus are modified or new Mould and I wonder what Thunderhoof's hook is like in a practical sense.
All new molds, I assure you. You can't really replace a gimmick of a toy with a new one. Thunderhoof on the other hand looks like a straight redeco of the 3-Step. What's interesting is that gimmick name has been trademarked.
:EDIT: OK, looking closer, I'm not so sure anymore... looks like they're retools after all.
I wonder if they'd make that shark that you can use as a bath toy ?
Hammerstrike? That would be interesting to see.
Posted by RAR on January 23rd, 2017 @ 6:07pm CST
( a soapy is the collectors names for branded character shampoo or bubble bath Bottles in case anyone doesn't know)
It would be vinyl plastic and might even float - I can see that working might even work to some extent with robot mode Bisk and Thermidor too.
I can't see anyone making such a container that isn't someone like Grimlock or Bumblebee unfortunately even though the Aquatic Decepticons would be kind perfect for it.
Another daft idea that such a thing could be put too is to make them split up the middle - have a normal bottle inside and once that is removed use the rubbery shell as a Pretender. Though that might require a lot of close product Marketing to pull something like that off. and then there is the question - what to put on & in the shells ?
Posted by Autobot N on January 23rd, 2017 @ 8:36pm CST
Starscream (actually Skywarp, but very few people have him in hand so far, and Scream and Warp are basically the same thing)
Stormshot
Posted by D-Maximal_Primal on January 23rd, 2017 @ 8:43pm CST
Autobot N wrote:Well, I'm currently planning to buy a few NuRiD deluxes, and I'd like to see what the general consensus on these guys is:
Starscream (actually Skywarp, but very few people have him in hand so far, and Scream and Warp are basically the same thing)
Stormshot
I plan to buy Stormshot. I've heard good reviews on him, and he looks good.
The Starscream mold is pretty good too, so you can go for whoever there, but I think Scream wears it so much better
Posted by Autobot N on January 23rd, 2017 @ 8:44pm CST
I've always been a Skywarp man (unless there's a Sunstorm version, of course), and Warp's paint apps look a lot better.D-Maximus_Prime wrote:The Starscream mold is pretty good too, so you can go for whoever there, but I think Scream wears it so much better
Posted by Kurona on January 23rd, 2017 @ 8:50pm CST
Posted by Autobot N on January 23rd, 2017 @ 8:51pm CST
Luckily, I'm certainly a fan of the Aerialbots.Kurona wrote:Stormshot is essentially borrowing Firefly's engineering and transformation with a new trick and removed Combining capability (... ironically considering the sub-line) in much the same way TR Chromedome does with Dead End. If you liked the Aerialbots, you'll like Stormshot - especially since he sort of refines their engineering into a better single product as he has no need to sacrifice anything for combination.
Posted by Zeedust on January 23rd, 2017 @ 10:48pm CST
RAR wrote:Robots in Disguise Hammerstrike Soapy ?
( a soapy is the collectors names for branded character shampoo or bubble bath Bottles in case anyone doesn't know)
It would be vinyl plastic and might even float - I can see that working might even work to some extent with robot mode Bisk and Thermidor too.
I can't see anyone making such a container that isn't someone like Grimlock or Bumblebee unfortunately even though the Aquatic Decepticons would be kind perfect for it.
Too bad there's no aquatic Autobots in this show.
(Although if you shove it over to Rescue Bots, Heatwave and High Tide would be good options.)
Posted by Cobotron on January 24th, 2017 @ 12:57am CST
His guns are cool looking, and the way they combine is nice.
Only thing I think could be better is his head should have been a ball joint. It's just a swivel, and hard to turn at that. With those shoulder stacks it's also impossible to turn his head 180 in alt mode. His face just sits there in the under carriage of the jet.
Posted by chuckdawg1999 on January 24th, 2017 @ 1:42am CST
Autobot N wrote:Well, I'm currently planning to buy a few NuRiD deluxes, and I'd like to see what the general consensus on these guys is:
Starscream (actually Skywarp, but very few people have him in hand so far, and Scream and Warp are basically the same thing)
Stormshot
The Starscream mold is solid, but the plastic is very soft and I'm concerned about it holding up over time.
Stormshot is awesome, but really stands out in the RID line
Posted by william-james88 on January 24th, 2017 @ 6:41am CST
Posted by william-james88 on January 24th, 2017 @ 6:53am CST
Posted by Kurona on January 24th, 2017 @ 8:57am CST
Posted by william-james88 on January 24th, 2017 @ 9:14am CST
Kurona wrote:It's also totally possible that this is a smaller, legends-scale Combiner with it coming in a larger scale and hence larger price later - much like ROTF Devastator.
Then again its not far from the price point of 3 legends and a deluxe as a box set. I do foresee this being simlified in some way since I cant think of anything at that price point in RID that wasnt simplified.
Posted by Kurona on January 24th, 2017 @ 9:16am CST
william-james88 wrote:Kurona wrote:It's also totally possible that this is a smaller, legends-scale Combiner with it coming in a larger scale and hence larger price later - much like ROTF Devastator.
Then again its not far from the price point of 3 legends and a deluxe as a box set. I do foresee this being simlified in some way since I cant think of anything at that price point in RID that wasnt simplified.
I agree. I do see this as a sort of experiment to see if they can do combiners consistently again after the success of CW.
Posted by RAR on January 24th, 2017 @ 9:41am CST
william-james88 wrote:The Robots in Disguise Combiner team toys are coming!
I can't seem to find it but last week I was looking at a site which contained the wave and assortment info for 2017 in the UK (it mentions Trypticon by name for release in the UK) for example and it had that combiner Force boxed set on the list too - I think it was pretty cheap like £30 or £35.00 if I recall.
I thought I mentioned it at the time.
Posted by william-james88 on January 24th, 2017 @ 9:45am CST
RAR wrote:william-james88 wrote:The Robots in Disguise Combiner team toys are coming!
I can't seem to find it but last week I was looking at a site which contained the wave and assortment info for 2017 in the UK (it mentions Trypticon by name for release in the UK) for example and it had that combiner Force boxed set on the list too - I think it was pretty cheap like £30 or £35.00 if I recall.
I thought I mentioned it at the time.
You didnt, and that would have been some fun info to have. Please find it again for us. £35.00 makes sense since this could easily be a $35 toy in the US and the UK usually matches that by putting a pound sign over the same number.
Posted by RAR on January 24th, 2017 @ 9:47am CST
http://www.transformertoys.co.uk/transf ... dule/12882
Well one of them anyway - there was another one I found with the prices on it too somewhere.
Posted by william-james88 on January 24th, 2017 @ 9:51am CST
RAR wrote:Found part of it :
http://www.transformertoys.co.uk/transf ... dule/12882
Well one of them anyway - there was another one I found with the prices on it too somewhere.
yeah if you can find the one with the prices that would be ideal
Posted by RAR on January 24th, 2017 @ 2:03pm CST
I glad I found some of it though and that it was of some use.
Posted by Stuartmaximus on January 24th, 2017 @ 2:32pm CST
RAR wrote:I wasn't on my normal computer when I was looking at it so I can't look it up in the history unfortunately - but it was a link I found off the back of some news story on UK toyfair. I've back traced the usual sites and I can't seem to find where I saw it .. sorry about that.
I glad I found some of it though and that it was of some use.
Do you mean this?
http://news.tfw2005.com/2017/01/23/tran ... 017-331403
or this?(if it's this one! you may be mixing things up with the combiner set with Slug)
http://news.tfw2005.com/2017/01/11/new- ... ces-330855
Posted by chuckdawg1999 on January 24th, 2017 @ 2:45pm CST
Posted by william-james88 on January 24th, 2017 @ 3:16pm CST
chuckdawg1999 wrote:If these are smaller combiners we might be seeing a return of the PCC concept, only this time with fully transforming robots that spring into limbs when combined.
Well, as fully transforming as the combiner force combiners we got so far.
Posted by william-james88 on January 24th, 2017 @ 3:48pm CST
Posted by Stuartmaximus on January 24th, 2017 @ 6:44pm CST
Posted by william-james88 on January 24th, 2017 @ 6:54pm CST
Posted by Stuartmaximus on January 24th, 2017 @ 7:08pm CST
william-james88 wrote:But Hasbro isnt at the show, so wouldnt the RID stuff just be random merch?
Dunno pal? but hoping when the vids & pics start rolling in that we'll get our first look at the Menasor toy.
Posted by D-Maximal_Primal on January 24th, 2017 @ 7:43pm CST
Posted by chuckdawg1999 on January 24th, 2017 @ 7:47pm CST
Posted by Emerje on January 24th, 2017 @ 7:49pm CST
william-james88 wrote:But Hasbro isnt at the show, so wouldnt the RID stuff just be random merch?
Yep, if Hasbro isn't there then the toys wont be either. The poster seems to be advertising Cartoon Network products more than anything, there's even a matching Powerpuff Girls poster opposite it, both with big CN logos on them.
Emerje
Posted by Wayne2049 on January 24th, 2017 @ 8:08pm CST
The only reason that I've been searching for these Tiny Titans guys is the fact that they brought back some G1 classics. I brushed this off the first time I saw it, but after looking closer and seeing Perceptor, I was sold. I spent... and hour at the store feeling all of the bags, but I've been successful and have gotten: Perceptor, Jazz, Prince Starscream, Windblade, Blaster, Galvatron, and Devastator. You can tell that I only got the ones that are currently known in the IDW comics, and not RID. I also was able to get a card of Inferno and Kickback because some fragging person slit the bags and left them behind.
I honestly hope that whoever did that, at least knows who they got, and not some little kid who has no respect for the meaning behind G1. If I spend hours feeling up the bags (and yes, I was feeling between their legs to try and find Prince Starscream's cape) then they should not be able to do what they did to cheat the rules of this twisted game.
I hate blind bags...
Posted by william-james88 on January 24th, 2017 @ 9:20pm CST
Wayne2049 wrote:I'm sorry to all of you RID fans, but I for one can not stand the Decepticon animal based alt-modes. I find it degrading to a (somewhat) honorable faction.
I get that. But then I remember my favourite group of Decepticons were the Predacons, all ruthless beastial members of the faction which showed why it was so feared. And this beast theme is kept with RID. In any case, get warrior Fracture when you have a chance, he isnt beast themed and is a great Decepticon toy
I hate blind bags...
Me too. There are some new ones for the Lego Batman movie and some minifigures are awesome. But if there is no way of knowing what I am getting, then there is no way I am paying $5 everytime.
Posted by Underc3211 on January 25th, 2017 @ 4:54am CST
On another note I never thought a 5min review of such a simple toy could be so drawn out. Though it could just be that the reviewers sarcasm is annoying to me.
Posted by Sarahthecutevixen on January 25th, 2017 @ 12:09pm CST
/s
Posted by Stuartmaximus on January 25th, 2017 @ 1:53pm CST
http://www.tfw2005.com/boards/threads/t ... 914/page-3
but if you zoom in on the lefthandside of the pic.....you can just make out a shelf filled with RID merch
now....whether like William James said that it's just random merch or already existing merch? is hard to determine from this pic.
Posted by william-james88 on January 25th, 2017 @ 1:57pm CST
Stuartmaximus wrote:now....whether like William James said that it's just random merch or already existing merch? is hard to determine from this pic.
I can tell you what it is, its die cast cars, thats what that company does. These arent from hasbro but instead from a licensed toy company that makes non transforming toys:
Those characters are non transforming figures.
Posted by Stuartmaximus on January 25th, 2017 @ 2:07pm CST
william-james88 wrote:Stuartmaximus wrote:now....whether like William James said that it's just random merch or already existing merch? is hard to determine from this pic.
I can tell you what it is, its die cast cars, thats what that company does. These arent from hasbro but instead from a licensed toy company that makes non transforming toys:
Those characters are non transforming figures.
Ah, ok, thanks
Posted by Stuartmaximus on January 25th, 2017 @ 2:29pm CST
RAR wrote:I wasn't on my normal computer when I was looking at it so I can't look it up in the history unfortunately - but it was a link I found off the back of some news story on UK toyfair. I've back traced the usual sites and I can't seem to find where I saw it .. sorry about that.
I glad I found some of it though and that it was of some use.
Is it this?
http://www.tfw2005.com/boards/threads/r ... 0.1097594/
Posted by william-james88 on January 25th, 2017 @ 2:32pm CST
Stuartmaximus wrote:RAR wrote:I wasn't on my normal computer when I was looking at it so I can't look it up in the history unfortunately - but it was a link I found off the back of some news story on UK toyfair. I've back traced the usual sites and I can't seem to find where I saw it .. sorry about that.
I glad I found some of it though and that it was of some use.
Is it this?
http://www.tfw2005.com/boards/threads/r ... 0.1097594/
Did you click the pic you linked to and check the top left corner?
You should see something familiar
Posted by Stuartmaximus on January 25th, 2017 @ 2:46pm CST
william-james88 wrote:Stuartmaximus wrote:RAR wrote:I wasn't on my normal computer when I was looking at it so I can't look it up in the history unfortunately - but it was a link I found off the back of some news story on UK toyfair. I've back traced the usual sites and I can't seem to find where I saw it .. sorry about that.
I glad I found some of it though and that it was of some use.
Is it this?
http://www.tfw2005.com/boards/threads/r ... 0.1097594/
Did you click the pic you linked to and check the top left corner?
You should see something familiar
Ah, right, lol
well...i dunno what RAR's referring to then
Posted by RAR on January 25th, 2017 @ 4:44pm CST
Posted by DedicatedGhostArt on January 25th, 2017 @ 5:04pm CST
Posted by Jelze Bunnycat on January 25th, 2017 @ 5:11pm CST
Posted by RAR on January 25th, 2017 @ 8:39pm CST
That is the same attitude that made me loose all interest in Gi Joe.
Posted by Kurona on January 25th, 2017 @ 8:44pm CST
RAR wrote:That makes me think less of both Hasbro and of the character both - as I thought for some desperate moment they'd done something "Original" and made a new Character flier Autobot. and not just looked at a Character list from the 1980's and thought "Right which box do we need to tick"
That is the same attitude that made me loose all interest in Gi Joe.
Not necessarily - Stormshot shares nothing in common with Jetfire/Skyfire other than being an Autobot that has a jet mode and has white in their colour scheme - and there's certainly no shortage of those in the G1 Autobot ranks - and this simply seems to be a case of them using the name and not making it a new version of the character. This happens a lot - RiD Strongarm not being a new version of Energon Strongarm, for instance. And Jetfire from Animated really not being a new version of G1 Jetfire (or any other Jetfire) either. And don't even try and tell me Armada Wheeljack is just Armada's version of G1 Wheeljack.
Just because they share a name with a character from G1 or another previous series doesn't mean it's meant to be a new iteration of the character. It can be a bit confusing and borderline in certain cases, but same name does not immediately equal same character. In fact in a lot of cases, it's likely just "well we have that name already, why not use that instead of applying for a trademark for a new name?"
Posted by RAR on January 25th, 2017 @ 9:05pm CST
I would be less irritated by Stormshot being a Skyblast homage than a Skyfire one.
I guess I am disappointed as for a moment I saw in that wave a glimmer of the idea that RID doesn't need to be just the toyline of infinite Bumblebees.
I guess there is something in my personality that just can't understand the mind set change that happened over that period that sometime around the later 1980's and early 1990's the established wisdom suddenly became that we have to be sold the same product over and over in different ways for ever.
Not that I dislike Starscream - but there is a part of me that has to wonder - would it really make the sun go cold if they used someone else as that template like Skyquake or Sunstorm say ?
Does Arcee "have" to be the go too token Female - (thank goodness for Strongarm - even if she is a name slapped sex swap on some level).
I just think this desire to endlessly repeat the past limits story telling and character development.
lets take Bumblebee now - lets fast forward to the 2020's and imagine another cartoon exists that Bumblebee is in but he's now an established leadership role one in no contention - like how Animated allowed Magnus to be in charge.
Also if we must revisit the past at least with the large cast in the past different ideas could be explored by that diverse and huge cast (same was true of Gi Joe to some extent) as you always had an Autobot that could be used to tell any given story.
They did that a lot in Season two of the original cartoon.
I'd like to see a show on Earth perhaps set in a time when the Autobots had been here for some time and in the open (sort of like how Energon open up) and we get a diverse cast of characters that rotate around a changing core - not a set core like in RID.
Perhaps RID's "Miniseries" idea is one that can be expanded on - and so they can hire a voice artist for 6 episodes not a whole run and tell as story that revolves around a particular set of individuals and then another story about others - and so on.
RID's never changing core cast is a bit boring to me it gets the odd addition sure like Drift or Windblade - but it's less often that the existing ones disappear for a while (though I think they do a bit).
RID did dip a toe in the water with this idea with making some of the Minicons central to the story - so that is a good positive example at least.
Posted by Emerje on January 25th, 2017 @ 9:05pm CST
Emerje