Revenge of the Fallen Demolishor Bio Revealed

Friday, February 20th, 2009 8:47AM CST

Categories: Movie Related News, Toy News, Auctions
Posted by: Skowl Views: 62,277

Topic Options: View Discussion · Sign in or Join to reply

This page may contain affiliate links. We may earn commissions when readers interact with or purchase items through these links. For more information, see our affiliate disclosures here.

An eBay auction for a MIB Demolishor figure from the Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen toyline has surfaced which showcases the figure's bio.

Demolishor is one of the Constructicons who will merge to form Devastator in the new film, opening June 24th 2009.

See the auction by clicking here.

Demolishor isn't very bright, but he knows when to fight, and when to run and hide. Arriving on Earth to find Megatron destroyed, hiding seemed like the best option. Since then, he's taken a few smaller Decepticons under his protection, and built quite a little community. It hasn't been easy hiding among the humans that creep like a disease over this planet, but he and his companions are content until a new Decepticon leader emerges to guide them back to glory.

Credit(s): toys-models, eBay.com, Autobot Firestorm

News Search

Got Transformers News? Let us know here!

Most Recent Transformers News

RUMOUR: Transformers Earthspark to be Cancelled / Replaced by New Transformers Animated Show

Posted 3 hours ago

Transformers Earthspark Season 2 Trailer Confirms Hashtag's New Form

Posted 7 hours ago

Repacks Confirmed for Studio Series ROTB Wheeljack, WFC Sideswipe, BB Megatron, 86 Swoop and More

Posted 8 hours ago

Original Cutscenes from Transformers Reactivate Leaked Revealing the Enemies to be Nanobot Swarms

Posted 4 days ago

Click here to post your comment about this news story!

Re: Revenge of the Fallen Demolishor Bio Revealed (887052)
Posted by Counterpunch on February 20th, 2009 @ 8:55am CST

SO ugly!

sigh...

Re: Revenge of the Fallen Demolishor Bio Revealed (887054)
Posted by zero-kaiser on February 20th, 2009 @ 8:57am CST

Interresting bio... but one thing jumped out at me that I'm kinda confused about... On the back of the box it mentions Demolishors Mech Alive gimmick as spinning gears in the shoulder.. but I dont see them on the toy, nor do I see panels that could be opened to reveal said gears...

Unless the photo of the toy is mistransformed.. perhaps theres been a mold change on this?

Re: Revenge of the Fallen Demolishor Bio Revealed (887057)
Posted by Zeds on February 20th, 2009 @ 9:00am CST

I thought the ability to stand in one's robot mode would be a major criteria for the designers? I guess not. WORST ROBOT MODE EVER!

Re: Revenge of the Fallen Demolishor Bio Revealed (887058)
Posted by Autobot Firestorm on February 20th, 2009 @ 9:02am CST

I'm still on the fence about the 'bot mode with this. The whole "unicycle" look is tough to swallow. It looks like its several steps from being fully transformed.

Alt mode is wicked bad ass though.

Re: Revenge of the Fallen Demolishor Bio Revealed (887059)
Posted by Nemesis Hacker on February 20th, 2009 @ 9:05am CST

zero-kaiser wrote:Interresting bio... but one thing jumped out at me that I'm kinda confused about... On the back of the box it mentions Demolishors Mech Alive gimmick as spinning gears in the shoulder.. but I dont see them on the toy, nor do I see panels that could be opened to reveal said gears...

Unless the photo of the toy is mistransformed.. perhaps theres been a mold change on this?

the mech alive gimmick for demolisher is the silvery parts in the upper arm/shovel arm that you can see

i like the alt mode, my all time fave concept is unicycle bots (beast machines thrust) and hovering bots (beast machines Obsidian) ohh allspark incinerator why couldent you look like obsidian lol

Re: Revenge of the Fallen Demolishor Bio Revealed (887060)
Posted by Counterpunch on February 20th, 2009 @ 9:06am CST

Anyone notice that on the box there is a claim for a 'Working Shovel!'?

Digging my own grave will never be easier!

Re: Revenge of the Fallen Demolishor Bio Revealed (887064)
Posted by zero-kaiser on February 20th, 2009 @ 9:14am CST

Nemesis Hacker wrote:
zero-kaiser wrote:Interresting bio... but one thing jumped out at me that I'm kinda confused about... On the back of the box it mentions Demolishors Mech Alive gimmick as spinning gears in the shoulder.. but I dont see them on the toy, nor do I see panels that could be opened to reveal said gears...

Unless the photo of the toy is mistransformed.. perhaps theres been a mold change on this?

the mech alive gimmick for demolisher is the silvery parts in the upper arm/shovel arm that you can see

i like the alt mode, my all time fave concept is unicycle bots (beast machines thrust) and hovering bots (beast machines Obsidian) ohh allspark incinerator why couldent you look like obsidian lol

Oh I know the silver parts in the arms spin.. but look at the photo showing the back of the box.. its pointing to parts of the shoulders that arent on the final product... thats what I was getting at.. sorry if I wasnt very clear

Re: Revenge of the Fallen Demolishor Bio Revealed (887066)
Posted by Autobot Firestorm on February 20th, 2009 @ 9:15am CST

zero-kaiser wrote:Interresting bio... but one thing jumped out at me that I'm kinda confused about... On the back of the box it mentions Demolishors Mech Alive gimmick as spinning gears in the shoulder.. but I dont see them on the toy, nor do I see panels that could be opened to reveal said gears...

Unless the photo of the toy is mistransformed.. perhaps theres been a mold change on this?

I think the toy is mistransformed. If you look at the shoulders on the back of the box, the cab of the shovel is to the inside - toward the main body. On the toy, the cab of the shovel is to the outside of the shoulder. This is causing the "moving gears" to be on the back of the toy.

I'm guessing that each of the of shoulders should be spun 180 degrees (on a verticle axis) on the toy to show the moving gears to the front of the toy.

Re: Revenge of the Fallen Demolishor Bio Revealed (887070)
Posted by zero-kaiser on February 20th, 2009 @ 9:23am CST

Autobot Firestorm wrote:I think the toy is mistransformed. If you look at the shoulders on the back of the box, the cab of the shovel is to the inside - toward the main body. On the toy, the cab of the shovel is to the outside of the shoulder. This is causing the "moving gears" to be on the back of the toy.

I'm guessing that each of the of shoulders should be spun 180 degrees (on a verticle axis) on the toy to show the moving gears to the front of the toy.

Well spotted Autobot Firestorm.. I hadnt noticed that

One thing I am curious about.. how long before fans kitbash a way to get the individual Constructicons (the ones with Robot Modes) to combine?.. :wink:

Re: Revenge of the Fallen Demolishor Bio Revealed (887075)
Posted by Counterpunch on February 20th, 2009 @ 9:39am CST

Would any of you be interested in this toy if it did not combine into Devastator?

Re: Revenge of the Fallen Demolishor Bio Revealed (887077)
Posted by SJ21 on February 20th, 2009 @ 9:42am CST

My feelings are so torn on this guy. The movie character looks so cool, and yet the toy looks like such garbage. I just don't know what to think!

Re: Revenge of the Fallen Demolishor Bio Revealed (887078)
Posted by SJ21 on February 20th, 2009 @ 9:43am CST

Counterpunch wrote:Would any of you be interested in this toy if it did not combine into Devastator?

The fact that he combines is the only reason I would consider buying it. As much as I want to like this character, I just don't know.

Re: Revenge of the Fallen Demolishor Bio Revealed (887079)
Posted by First-Aid on February 20th, 2009 @ 9:46am CST

OK..maybe I'm missing something.

We know there are six constructicons that combine. The shovel that combines in that group is Scavenger. He looks almost identical to Demolishor. Does that mean that Dems will NOT combine with the others? Or are we going to see him smashed in the opening sequence of the movie (as evidenced by the Chinese street signs on the overpass he crushes) and then REBUILT to combine with other Decepticons?

I'm a tad confused...

Re: Revenge of the Fallen Demolishor Bio Revealed (887081)
Posted by zero-kaiser on February 20th, 2009 @ 9:50am CST

SJ21 wrote:The fact that he combines is the only reason I would consider buying it. As much as I want to like this character, I just don't know.

I thought the toys with individual robot modes could not combine to form Devestator?

Re: Revenge of the Fallen Demolishor Bio Revealed (887085)
Posted by Ronynus Prime on February 20th, 2009 @ 9:57am CST

That's the standard concensus, yes. I don't see any way this toy can combine in the fashion I saw the non-robot toys... which is still a shame considering how good HasTakTom has gotten at engineering these things. I also hope there is an in-movie explanation as to why Devastator's name was used by Brawl...

Re: Revenge of the Fallen Demolishor Bio Revealed (887108)
Posted by SJ21 on February 20th, 2009 @ 10:31am CST

PlasmaEnergyGod wrote:That's the standard concensus, yes. I don't see any way this toy can combine in the fashion I saw the non-robot toys... which is still a shame considering how good HasTakTom has gotten at engineering these things. I also hope there is an in-movie explanation as to why Devastator's name was used by Brawl...

Wow. Well, I was really confused then. Sorry about that. I guess that means I am not buying any of the constructicons from the movie then. Disappointing.

Re: Revenge of the Fallen Demolishor Bio Revealed (887113)
Posted by Bouncy X on February 20th, 2009 @ 10:36am CST

he should be able to stand on his own. its hard to tell from this photo, but others i've seen show that those "wheels" in robot form aren't your typical round wheels. its more like a triagular-ish shape.

even this photo, if you pay attention to the wheels, you can tell the back goes out a little before going down.

Re: Revenge of the Fallen Demolishor Bio Revealed (887120)
Posted by Kryptikore on February 20th, 2009 @ 10:48am CST

PlasmaEnergyGod wrote:That's the standard concensus, yes. I don't see any way this toy can combine in the fashion I saw the non-robot toys... which is still a shame considering how good HasTakTom has gotten at engineering these things. I also hope there is an in-movie explanation as to why Devastator's name was used by Brawl...

Unfortunately it was a mistake they used Devastators name. They didn't edit it out. The problem with the first movie is that they didn't take it as seriously as they do now. So I'm guessing there was plenty more problems they could have worked out in the first film! Heck Bay said it was just a big dumb robot movie! Now with ROTF it's not dumb anymore.

I'm liking this new type of Transformer. If any of you have or end up picking up a Beast Machines Thrust you can appreciate the look. The only downside to this one wheel design is he needs a stand to really get a decent pose. As far as Devastator; I will be buying 2 of every constructicon and making him from scratch! The cement mixer on devastator was out right disapointing and aggrevating! They basically flip a couple panels place him right on top; thats it!

Re: Revenge of the Fallen Demolishor Bio Revealed (887128)
Posted by Ronynus Prime on February 20th, 2009 @ 11:05am CST

A clip from the trailer (blink or you miss it) shows him using the wheel seen above his shoulders as a second wheel that is placed directly behind the first, thus giving him a two-wheeled bicycle-like way of locomotion. I will be buying this guy -- I'm not upset about the lack of detail; apart from the hands/fingers, from what I saw in the trailer, this figure is spot-on.

Re: Revenge of the Fallen Demolishor Bio Revealed (887172)
Posted by Mechanurgist on February 20th, 2009 @ 12:39pm CST

Kryptikore wrote: Now with ROTF it's not dumb anymore.

Oh, don't you worry about that. It'll be plenty dumb.

Toy is horrendously ugly. Mind you, the original Constructicons were no beauty-pageant winners either, but this takes the cake. :o)

Re: Revenge of the Fallen Demolishor Bio Revealed (887177)
Posted by Spenser on February 20th, 2009 @ 12:47pm CST

Wasn't sure about his at first but the more I see of the toy the more I like it. Definitely be picking it up when the time comes.

Re: Revenge of the Fallen Demolishor Bio Revealed (887179)
Posted by Archatron on February 20th, 2009 @ 12:49pm CST

zero-kaiser wrote:
SJ21 wrote:The fact that he combines is the only reason I would consider buying it. As much as I want to like this character, I just don't know.

I thought the toys with individual robot modes could not combine to form Devestator?

I hve this sitting right here, far as I can tell it DOES NOT and WONT combine with the others. If it does I will be extrmely suprised. Far as his Mech Alive gimmick goes, when you bend his "arms" the silver large gear on the upper arm rotates and it is indeed a neat feature. I'm waiting for the Audi and Sideswipe to arrive anyday now as well.

I really like the incorporation of this feature into the toys, makes them seem a little more real, for toy robots that is :lol:

Re: Revenge of the Fallen Demolishor Bio Revealed (887180)
Posted by Megatron Wolf on February 20th, 2009 @ 12:53pm CST

Hate the figure but love this part of the bio "humans that creep like a disease over this planet"

Re: Revenge of the Fallen Demolishor Bio Revealed (887181)
Posted by decepticon legion on February 20th, 2009 @ 12:56pm CST

First-Aid wrote:OK..maybe I'm missing something.

We know there are six constructicons that combine. The shovel that combines in that group is Scavenger. He looks almost identical to Demolishor. Does that mean that Dems will NOT combine with the others? Or are we going to see him smashed in the opening sequence of the movie (as evidenced by the Chinese street signs on the overpass he crushes) and then REBUILT to combine with other Decepticons?

I'm a tad confused...

I have this theory. Hasbro has lost copyright to the Scavenger name, so they call the constructicons leader Demolishor now. And they printed SCVNGR sign to the non-transforming version, which is perfectly legal.

The same happened to Alternators Shockblast. The toy is called Shockblast, but it has SHKWAV on the licence plate:

http://www.seibertron.com/transformers/toys/alternators/shockblast/510/1/18/

What do you think?

Re: Revenge of the Fallen Demolishor Bio Revealed (887193)
Posted by Agent 007 on February 20th, 2009 @ 1:23pm CST

nice bio I still dunno if I'll pick him up but I'll prolly break the design is growing on me

Re: Revenge of the Fallen Demolishor Bio Revealed (887197)
Posted by Autobotic9 on February 20th, 2009 @ 1:30pm CST

Demolishor- the kick-ass, bridge destroying, loving foster-father.

Re: Revenge of the Fallen Demolishor Bio Revealed (887200)
Posted by Mkall on February 20th, 2009 @ 1:36pm CST

I like that they're making non-traditional robots now. Who said TFs had to have two arms and two legs?

Re: Revenge of the Fallen Demolishor Bio Revealed (887207)
Posted by Scaleface on February 20th, 2009 @ 1:55pm CST

Does anyone even know if there will officially be "Constructicons" in the movie at all? We seem to have fix Decepticons here, yes, but they aren't named G1 Constructicon names, and they seem to only be called a "a few Decepticons" under Demolishor, officialy.

What I'm saying here is if someone who didn't know any TF history saw the movie and looked at the toy boxes and commercials, would he hear or read the word "Constructicon" anywhere?

Re: Revenge of the Fallen Demolishor Bio Revealed (887224)
Posted by Counterpunch on February 20th, 2009 @ 2:23pm CST

Mkall wrote:I like that they're making non-traditional robots now. Who said TFs had to have two arms and two legs?

Everyone who hated Beast Machines Rattrap and the Mini-con that comes with Armada Sideways and Energon Shockblast, etc, etc...

Re: Revenge of the Fallen Demolishor Bio Revealed (887247)
Posted by Sabrblade on February 20th, 2009 @ 2:50pm CST

decepticon legion wrote:
First-Aid wrote:OK..maybe I'm missing something.

We know there are six constructicons that combine. The shovel that combines in that group is Scavenger. He looks almost identical to Demolishor. Does that mean that Dems will NOT combine with the others? Or are we going to see him smashed in the opening sequence of the movie (as evidenced by the Chinese street signs on the overpass he crushes) and then REBUILT to combine with other Decepticons?

I'm a tad confused...

I have this theory. Hasbro has lost copyright to the Scavenger name, so they call the constructicons leader Demolishor now. And they printed SCVNGR sign to the non-transforming version, which is perfectly legal.

The same happened to Alternators Shockblast. The toy is called Shockblast, but it has SHKWAV on the licence plate:

http://www.seibertron.com/transformers/toys/alternators/shockblast/510/1/18/

What do you think?

1. Demolisher and Scavenger are the same guy. We do not know which name will be the final one, but given that "Demolishor" is confirmed to be the name of the Voyager toy, it seems more likely. Then again, Scavenger was the name of one of the original Constructicons (and had the same altmode as this one), so it fits too.

2. It's not likely that Hasbro has lost the rights to the name "Scavenger". It's one of those names that's well known enough to not lose so easily. It's like the names "Prowl" or "Ironhide". Hasbro won't lose those names so easily either.

3. "Scavenger was probably the preliminary name for Demolishor. Someone probably didn't get the memo about the name change and thus leaving us with two names for the same guy.

Scaleface wrote:Does anyone even know if there will officially be "Constructicons" in the movie at all? We seem to have fix Decepticons here, yes, but they aren't named G1 Constructicon names, and they seem to only be called a "a few Decepticons" under Demolishor, officialy.

What I'm saying here is if someone who didn't know any TF history saw the movie and looked at the toy boxes and commercials, would he hear or read the word "Constructicon" anywhere?

The name of the $100 set is called "Constructicon Devastator".

Re: Revenge of the Fallen Demolishor Bio Revealed (887251)
Posted by Windsweeper on February 20th, 2009 @ 2:53pm CST

I can get just about get past the alien heads in the last film despite Prime having a G1 -esque type head which makes you wonder why all their heads couldn't have been done like that.

But a really big Decepticon that towers over Optimus Prime zipping around on a unicycle is the stupidest thing I've ever seen. And I thought nothing could be worse than George Clooney's flip out ice skates in the Batman film that almost killed the franchise but this actually beats it.

Hated the Vehicon robot modes in Beast Machines and can't believe they're bringing something so stupid into the film.

Millions to spend on a movie budget and this is what we get? I'm almost ready to give up on Transformers. I mean the realistic bad ass alien robot concept we got in the first film has just been negated. The robot designers for these films should be flogged. First Scorponok and now this garbage. We'll be getting tributes to Alpha Trion's beard and Rattrap's stupid buck teeth next.

Re: Revenge of the Fallen Demolishor Bio Revealed (887262)
Posted by warchantgod10 on February 20th, 2009 @ 3:04pm CST

Ok, not sure as to why no one seems to be curious as I am as to the meaning behind the last sentence of his bio where it talks of a new emerging decepticon leader. so...that now can possibly tell us a couple things; it's not megatron, hince the word 'new' being used, therefore it must be starscream or the fallen I would assume, and whoever it may be, how then does this play out in the possibility of inner quarrels amongst decepticons (foes)? Since we are already made aware that the autobots, at least optimus, attempts to thwart the massive menace, well who else may be against the beast as well, and therfore devastator? Is it starscreams band of hulligans or will it possibly be the fallen himself who may have to deal with the ol' devy, or maybe just the autos. My point is...I thought I recall there being some sort of leadership struggle amongst the ranks of the decepticon race according to plot rumors, like starsream, soundwave, megs coming back, the fallen etc. theres many options. But who is it that summons or orders the rise of devy? maybe it's the fallen's REVENGE against all, friend and foe. anyone care to share your thoughts on this?

Re: Revenge of the Fallen Demolishor Bio Revealed (887293)
Posted by YRQRM0 on February 20th, 2009 @ 4:03pm CST

Sabrblade wrote:
decepticon legion wrote:
First-Aid wrote:OK..maybe I'm missing something.

We know there are six constructicons that combine. The shovel that combines in that group is Scavenger. He looks almost identical to Demolishor. Does that mean that Dems will NOT combine with the others? Or are we going to see him smashed in the opening sequence of the movie (as evidenced by the Chinese street signs on the overpass he crushes) and then REBUILT to combine with other Decepticons?

I'm a tad confused...

I have this theory. Hasbro has lost copyright to the Scavenger name, so they call the constructicons leader Demolishor now. And they printed SCVNGR sign to the non-transforming version, which is perfectly legal.

The same happened to Alternators Shockblast. The toy is called Shockblast, but it has SHKWAV on the licence plate:

http://www.seibertron.com/transformers/toys/alternators/shockblast/510/1/18/

What do you think?
1. Demolisher and Scavenger are the same guy. We do not know which name will be the final one, but given that "Demolishor" is confirmed to be the name of the Voyager toy, it seems more likely. Then again, Scavenger was the name of one of the original Constructicons (and had the same altmode as this one), so it fits too.

2. It's not likely that Hasbro has lost the rights to the name "Scavenger". It's one of those names that's well known enough to not lose so easily. It's like the names "Prowl" or "Ironhide". Hasbro won't lose those names so easily either.

3. "Scavenger was probably the preliminary name for Demolishor. Someone probably didn't get the memo about the name change and thus leaving us with two names for the same guy.

Scaleface wrote:Does anyone even know if there will officially be "Constructicons" in the movie at all? We seem to have fix Decepticons here, yes, but they aren't named G1 Constructicon names, and they seem to only be called a "a few Decepticons" under Demolishor, officialy.

What I'm saying here is if someone who didn't know any TF history saw the movie and looked at the toy boxes and commercials, would he hear or read the word "Constructicon" anywhere?
The name of the $100 set is called "Constructicon Devastator".

I was confused about that, too. It seems like his name could be scavnger, considering all the similarities to G1, but the box says Demolisher. Does the voyager version hve "SCVNGR" Printed on it anywhere?

And another thing I was wondering, do the other six constructicons have separate versions that can transform? Or is Demolisher/Scavenger the only one who has two versions of himself.

Re: Revenge of the Fallen Demolishor Bio Revealed (887326)
Posted by Robinson on February 20th, 2009 @ 4:32pm CST

Sabrblade wrote:1. Demolisher and Scavenger are the same guy. We do not know which name will be the final one, but given that "Demolishor" is confirmed to be the name of the Voyager toy, it seems more likely. Then again, Scavenger was the name of one of the original Constructicons (and had the same altmode as this one), so it fits too.

Similar Vehicle modes, 2 different characters. They ar not the same.

Re: Revenge of the Fallen Demolishor Bio Revealed (887342)
Posted by Swiftpaw on February 20th, 2009 @ 5:00pm CST

Hasbro's tendancy to mislabel things on card backs strike again.

The gears aren't actually in the shoulders, they're most likely those silver gear shafts you see in the upper arms.

Re: Revenge of the Fallen Demolishor Bio Revealed (887346)
Posted by Robinson on February 20th, 2009 @ 5:08pm CST

Swiftpaw wrote:Hasbro's tendancy to mislabel things on card backs strike again.

The gears aren't actually in the shoulders, they're most likely those silver gear shafts you see in the upper arms.

Theres gears in the shoulders as well, its already been noted that the transformed pic's shoulders are backwards

Re: Revenge of the Fallen Demolishor Bio Revealed (887348)
Posted by Archanubis on February 20th, 2009 @ 5:19pm CST

Interesting bio - a Decepticon with a heart.

Re: Revenge of the Fallen Demolishor Bio Revealed (887359)
Posted by Scaleface on February 20th, 2009 @ 5:38pm CST

Robinson wrote:
Sabrblade wrote:1. Demolisher and Scavenger are the same guy. We do not know which name will be the final one, but given that "Demolishor" is confirmed to be the name of the Voyager toy, it seems more likely. Then again, Scavenger was the name of one of the original Constructicons (and had the same altmode as this one), so it fits too.

Similar Vehicle modes, 2 different characters. They ar not the same.

No, one character with two different toys. One is the individually sold one and the other is from the combiner giftset.

Re: Revenge of the Fallen Demolishor Bio Revealed (887365)
Posted by Robinson on February 20th, 2009 @ 5:52pm CST

Scaleface wrote:
Robinson wrote:
Sabrblade wrote:1. Demolisher and Scavenger are the same guy. We do not know which name will be the final one, but given that "Demolishor" is confirmed to be the name of the Voyager toy, it seems more likely. Then again, Scavenger was the name of one of the original Constructicons (and had the same altmode as this one), so it fits too.

Similar Vehicle modes, 2 different characters. They ar not the same.

No, one character with two different toys. One is the individually sold one and the other is from the combiner giftset.

Look carefully theres 2 different shovellers on there.

Re: Revenge of the Fallen Demolishor Bio Revealed (887366)
Posted by Robinson on February 20th, 2009 @ 5:53pm CST

Robinson wrote:
Scaleface wrote:
Robinson wrote:
Sabrblade wrote:1. Demolisher and Scavenger are the same guy. We do not know which name will be the final one, but given that "Demolishor" is confirmed to be the name of the Voyager toy, it seems more likely. Then again, Scavenger was the name of one of the original Constructicons (and had the same altmode as this one), so it fits too.

Similar Vehicle modes, 2 different characters. They ar not the same.

No, one character with two different toys. One is the individually sold one and the other is from the combiner giftset.

Look carefully theres 2 different shovellers on there.

http://www.seibertron.com/news/index.ph ... 20&f_cat=4

Re: Revenge of the Fallen Demolishor Bio Revealed (887382)
Posted by Scaleface on February 20th, 2009 @ 6:31pm CST

YES, we all know they are two different toys. They are making TWO TOYS for this character, and they have slightly different paint decos. They are both Demolishor. One is a more complex toy that turns into a robot, the other is a less complex toy that combines into Devastator.

That picture does have 7 vehicles, but everything we have heard says Devastator is now 6 vehicles. He's a excavator (Demolishor), scoop loader, crane, dump truck, cement mixer and a bulldozer (Rampage).

Re: Revenge of the Fallen Demolishor Bio Revealed (887384)
Posted by Sabrblade on February 20th, 2009 @ 6:35pm CST

@Robinson:

Why did you quote yourself?

Can you point out on the image where the these two shovels are on Devastator's body, as you claim them to be?

And, the Voyager Demolisher toy cannot combine with the Devastator components. Just like how Deluxe Rampage cannot either, which is why a second, much larger Rampage toy is a Devastator component.

Re: Revenge of the Fallen Demolishor Bio Revealed (887404)
Posted by Robinson on February 20th, 2009 @ 7:11pm CST

If they are making 2 toys of 1 character why are the paint app's completely different, the would both have the "scvngr" pain on them and the shovel, tank treads, and cab would be mold identically, instead of being different as they are.

Looking back at the picture the 2nd shovel in the photo is the right arm.

Re: Revenge of the Fallen Demolishor Bio Revealed (887425)
Posted by Archatron on February 20th, 2009 @ 8:07pm CST

Robinson wrote:If they are making 2 toys of 1 character why are the paint app's completely different, the would both have the "scvngr" pain on them and the shovel, tank treads, and cab would be mold identically, instead of being different as they are.

Looking back at the picture the 2nd shovel in the photo is the right arm.

One excavator. Demolisher forms the torso. They made two slightly different versions because one transforms into an individual robot( which I have on my computer desk right now) and the other doesnt, only forms the torso for the giftset. They probably put SCVNGR on the side to differentiate between the two versions because they are indeed the same character. There aren't any steam shovel/excavator arms, that set is what we are getting and the individual tf'ing bots, for now.

Re: Revenge of the Fallen Demolishor Bio Revealed (887436)
Posted by Stockade on February 20th, 2009 @ 8:22pm CST

Well, after looking at this guy closely and watching the teaser trailer a bizillion times, i think I'll get this guy! one reason is i cant justify spending double the money on all the constructicons i would rather have the ones that a an alt mode and a robot mode for display or show, than have the ones that ONLY have an alt mode and then combine into devastator. Too me i think theres something hidden will all of these figures, maybe hasbro is not showing the big picture with each of these constructicons? maybe all of them have a hidden alt mode, like Galvatron did, that walking tank thing he transformed into. After seeing this guy in the trailer, he's nothing but brute strength and power, so whats not to like about him!
yes yes i understand that he doesn't have 2 legs like the rest, but are we so use to watching our favorite cartoon from the 80's, that we can't expand our imagination a little that all robots doesn't have to have 2 legs!!

Re: Revenge of the Fallen Demolishor Bio Revealed (887452)
Posted by Craven Knight on February 20th, 2009 @ 8:52pm CST

This guy has to be in the Top Ten for Worst Transformer Ever.

Re: Revenge of the Fallen Demolishor Bio Revealed (887546)
Posted by DMSL on February 21st, 2009 @ 3:13am CST

Botmode looks like crap fire the guy that designed him please.

Re: Revenge of the Fallen Demolishor Bio Revealed (887570)
Posted by Rated X on February 21st, 2009 @ 5:51am CST

Too weird but I will buy him to form Devastator. He will go great next my Gi. But that leads to my next question....The fool who decided to cange Brawl's name to Devastator in part one really screwed up...Nowq what are they planning to name Devastator in the movie ??? Or are they just going to play dumb and hope we all forgot ???

Re: Revenge of the Fallen Demolishor Bio Revealed (887601)
Posted by Sabrblade on February 21st, 2009 @ 7:58am CST

Rated X wrote:Too weird but I will buy him to form Devastator. He will go great next my Gi. But that leads to my next question....The fool who decided to cange Brawl's name to Devastator in part one really screwed up...Nowq what are they planning to name Devastator in the movie ??? Or are they just going to play dumb and hope we all forgot ???

This guy does not combine to form Devastator. His other toy that come packaged with the other Constructicons (and does not have a robot mode) does.

Brawl's name in the first movie was a mistake that Bay did on purpose. He like the sound of the name "Devastator" beter than the name "Brawl". Brawl's name is still Brawl, no matter what. The Reign of Starscream fixed this error by reshowing the same movie scene where the Decepticons state their names and replaced the name "Devastator" with "Brawl".

Devastator will be called "Devastator" in ROTF. One intentional error on Bay's behalf will not stop that.

Re: Revenge of the Fallen Demolishor Bio Revealed (887641)
Posted by dragons on February 21st, 2009 @ 9:31am CST

nice figure i probably desrver it since deceided to buy 2 of these versions complete devastatr and the bots that transfomr to bot modes itlb expensive for me ill the them both.

whats with his bio are hasbro poeple are trying to tell us they need to get out more with the scerw ups on there figures ( paint jobs ) and his bio i felt like i was reading doctor sues book for the intro of his i do not like green eggs & ham sam i am strange but funny

Click here to view additional comments about this topic at the Energon Pub Forums ...