Paramount Promises Transformers 5 in 2016 One Day Before World Premiere of Age of Extinction

Paranormal Activity 5? Didn't they already do that?

william-james88 wrote:

hinomars19 wrote:
I didn't mind it actually. As a kid I preferred the Primus story from the comics, so Takara basically making the existence of Primus canon whilst keeping the Quintesson origin story was pretty cool for me. Plus, it shows somebody did enough research to pull a load of stuff together and make it work. Of course it's pretty tentative that Primus picks and chooses when to call himself Primus or Oracle or what have you for convenience. But it pulls together the sunbow cartoon, Beast Machines, Beast wars (including II and Neo) rather nicely.

Convoluted as it is, I like it

Wait wait wait... The Oracle of Beast Machines is Primus?!?! Beast machines and G1 are all in the same continuity so it makes sense but I never thought of it that way.

Also, there is an esthetic connection between the symbols found on the RID Optimus Beast Machines toy and the symbols on the Vector Prime toy who was a principle emmisary of Primus.

And one last thing, I find it pretty cool that we are having such a fun transformers plot/origin conversation in a transformers movie forum. The haters cant say nothing good comes out of those films anymore

in a roundabout way, yes, the BM Oracle is Primus. As far as the cartoon is concerned, the Oracle is Vector Sigma with an external user entry on it. The 3h convention comics go on to source the Oracle Shell as a product of the Quintessons, and at the end of the comic Primus thanks the Quintessons for helping to evolve his children. But how much stock should be put into the Convention comic is kinda vague.

so Hansel & Gretel 2 is happening? awesome...i loved that movie!

Yeesh, was I the only one that heartily chuckled at the dancing?

william-james88 wrote:

hinomars19 wrote:
I didn't mind it actually. As a kid I preferred the Primus story from the comics, so Takara basically making the existence of Primus canon whilst keeping the Quintesson origin story was pretty cool for me. Plus, it shows somebody did enough research to pull a load of stuff together and make it work. Of course it's pretty tentative that Primus picks and chooses when to call himself Primus or Oracle or what have you for convenience. But it pulls together the sunbow cartoon, Beast Machines, Beast wars (including II and Neo) rather nicely.

Convoluted as it is, I like it

Wait wait wait... The Oracle of Beast Machines is Primus?!?! Beast machines and G1 are all in the same continuity so it makes sense but I never thought of it that way.

Also, there is an esthetic connection between the symbols found on the RID Optimus Beast Machines toy and the symbols on the Vector Prime toy who was a principle emmisary of Primus.

And one last thing, I find it pretty cool that we are having such a fun transformers plot/origin conversation in a transformers movie forum. The haters cant say nothing good comes out of those films anymore

in a roundabout way, yes, the BM Oracle is Primus. As far as the cartoon is concerned, the Oracle is Vector Sigma with an external user entry on it. The 3h convention comics go on to source the Oracle Shell as a product of the Quintessons, and at the end of the comic Primus thanks the Quintessons for helping to evolve his children. But how much stock should be put into the Convention comic is kinda vague.

KirbyForce1 wrote:Paranormal Activity 5? Didn't they already do that?

According to IMDB it's schedule to come out Oct. 24 2014. Maybe they're pushing it back?

Mindmaster wrote:Yeesh, was I the only one that heartily chuckled at the dancing?

Well no i was too

I was just getting angry at the pople who are mad that there is comedy and believe that only a serious transformers movie would be good.



*Sarcasm on*

Even though giant transforming aliens from a toyline should be taken serious and should always act like war machines and never have fun because fun is stupid and not allowed!


*sarcasm off*

Flashwave wrote: yes, the BM Oracle is Primus. As far as the cartoon is concerned, the Oracle is Vector Sigma with an external user entry on it.

Do you mind elaborating, I am kind of lost. I only watched BW and BM as far as G1 continuity (as well as a handful of classic TF episodes and the 80s movie of course).
What is Vector Sigma in BM? And is it the same vector sigma in the original TF cartoon? And what do you mean by external user entry?

Hey fellas, it's great that we're getting discussion here, but please keep it on-topic. If you'd like to continue discussing whatever is being discussed that isn't on-topic, either discuss via PM or make another thread. Thanks!

It kills me how so many bash TFs?! If you can do a better job get the funds up and make your own! People are are Nitpicking & Dissecting the movie from just a few clips they've seen giving negative comments?! WTH Are you millions invested in these movies?!

If you don't want to see the movie plain and simple don't go see it! It ain't rocket science! Everyday theirs someone B**ching & Complaining it ain't that deep!

Great save Optimus Prime! Looks like Brazil and Germany is lucky Cybertron is not in the World Cup this year cause those bots would bring it home... away from Earth.

Check out ESPN's Latest Transformers 4 Age Of Extinction Commercial!

I cannot find the plot thread, so could someone please guide me?

I have found this, which is a detailed plot summary giving us an idea of what to expect. It answers several questions we have been discussing (origin of dinobots and link to Dinosaurs). It is obviously full of spoilers so anyone who wants to wait to watch the film, please do not click on this link.

It is an early review of the film with full plot summary:

http://movies.cosmicbooknews.com/content/exclusive-transformers-age-extinction-early-review-spoilers

william-james88 wrote:I cannot find the plot thread, so could someone please guide me?

I have found this, which is a detailed plot summary giving us an idea of what to expect. It answers all the questions we have been discussing. It is obviously full of spoilers so anyone who wants to wait to watch the film, please do not click on this link.

It is an early review of the film with full plot summary:

http://movies.cosmicbooknews.com/content/exclusive-transformers-age-extinction-early-review-spoilers

i read the article earlier its a bit sketchy.

william-james88 wrote:I cannot find the plot thread, so could someone please guide me?

I have found this, which is a detailed plot summary giving us an idea of what to expect. It answers all the questions we have been discussing. It is obviously full of spoilers so anyone who wants to wait to watch the film, please do not click on this link.

It is an early review of the film with full plot summary:

http://movies.cosmicbooknews.com/content/exclusive-transformers-age-extinction-early-review-spoilers

HAAAAAAAAA


Its fake dude especially since you got it off the same website a guy said his friend saw a trailers and gave a description of it

So who dies?

no mention of the other guys? Ratchet being in the film debunks that.

"A FRIEND of Cosmic Book News managed to see rough cut of Transformers: Age of Extinction." Haha, sure thing. It's always a "friend" isn't it? :L
The guy barely talks about anything new.
Lockdown working with Attinger to eliminate all Transformers doesn't really fit at all with what we've heard so far. "Lockdown's just a bounty hunter, he's here for one person, one alien and then he's out of here".
Dinobots only in the last 15-20 mins of the movie? That sounds like an extremely short final battle.
No mention of who Lockdown is working for or the whole "You were built, they want you back" thing?
I'd be shocked if this was legit.

Reminds me of the 80's

Yeah. It seems like this guy watched the trailers, then tried to make a complete movie plot out of it. There are no spoilers in it that aren't in the trailers. It's missing a lot of stuff. He tries to weasel out of giving us any plot details (and thus exposing his lie) by stating that the rest of the movie is "typical Bay stuff".

Gemini220 wrote:It kills me how so many bash TFs?! If you can do a better job get the funds up and make your own! People are are Nitpicking & Dissecting the movie from just a few clips they've seen giving negative comments?! WTH Are you millions invested in these movies?!

If you don't want to see the movie plain and simple don't go see it! It ain't rocket science! Everyday theirs someone B**ching & Complaining it ain't that deep!

so let me get this straight we should only express our opinions as long as they praise everything that is transformers? Those of us who dont like what we are seeing or dont like how a beloved franchise thats been around for 30 years is going should just shut our mouths? Last time i checked this is a discussion thread not a communist country and the point of a discussion thread is to get opinions of the users be them positive or negative. And those of us who bitch about these movies have every right to, just like how the people who praise these movies have every right to as well. You dont like it to bad cause thats how the internet works

Megatron Wolf wrote:

Gemini220 wrote:It kills me how so many bash TFs?! If you can do a better job get the funds up and make your own! People are are Nitpicking & Dissecting the movie from just a few clips they've seen giving negative comments?! WTH Are you millions invested in these movies?!

If you don't want to see the movie plain and simple don't go see it! It ain't rocket science! Everyday theirs someone B**ching & Complaining it ain't that deep!

so let me get this straight we should only express our opinions as long as they praise everything that is transformers? Those of us who dont like what we are seeing or dont like how a beloved franchise thats been around for 30 years is going should just shut our mouths? Last time i checked this is a discussion thread not a communist country and the point of a discussion thread is to get opinions of the users be them positive or negative. And those of us who bitch about these movies have every right to, just like how the people who praise these movies have every right to as well. You dont like it to bad cause thats how the internet works

It's all fine and good to express your opinion but what I'm saying is everyday someone says because of this or that I'm not seeing the movie. Okay we get it you don't like it fine, stop posting the same ole nonsense it's getting real old real fast!

for serious transformer movie like to see this happen

Megatron Wolf wrote:

Gemini220 wrote:It kills me how so many bash TFs?! If you can do a better job get the funds up and make your own! People are are Nitpicking & Dissecting the movie from just a few clips they've seen giving negative comments?! WTH Are you millions invested in these movies?!

If you don't want to see the movie plain and simple don't go see it! It ain't rocket science! Everyday theirs someone B**ching & Complaining it ain't that deep!

so let me get this straight we should only express our opinions as long as they praise everything that is transformers? Those of us who dont like what we are seeing or dont like how a beloved franchise thats been around for 30 years is going should just shut our mouths? Last time i checked this is a discussion thread not a communist country and the point of a discussion thread is to get opinions of the users be them positive or negative. And those of us who bitch about these movies have every right to, just like how the people who praise these movies have every right to as well. You dont like it to bad cause thats how the internet works

No but thats not what this thread is for.



if you want to say how much you hate it make your own thread and keep it out of ours.



I'm sure I'm not the only one who does not want to see negative comments because they never help and start arguments.

mirageandjazz1197 wrote:

Megatron Wolf wrote:

Gemini220 wrote:It kills me how so many bash TFs?! If you can do a better job get the funds up and make your own! People are are Nitpicking & Dissecting the movie from just a few clips they've seen giving negative comments?! WTH Are you millions invested in these movies?!

If you don't want to see the movie plain and simple don't go see it! It ain't rocket science! Everyday theirs someone B**ching & Complaining it ain't that deep!

so let me get this straight we should only express our opinions as long as they praise everything that is transformers? Those of us who dont like what we are seeing or dont like how a beloved franchise thats been around for 30 years is going should just shut our mouths? Last time i checked this is a discussion thread not a communist country and the point of a discussion thread is to get opinions of the users be them positive or negative. And those of us who bitch about these movies have every right to, just like how the people who praise these movies have every right to as well. You dont like it to bad cause thats how the internet works

No but thats not what this thread is for.



if you want to say how much you hate it make your own thread and keep it out of ours.



I'm sure I'm not the only one who does not want to see negative comments because they never help and start arguments.

What? Um, wrong. Since when did Seibertron threads become one directional and only allow certain type of comments?

william-james88 wrote:

partholon wrote:
TBH after all the effort hasbro has gone to get the TFs origin to at least make some kind of sense im somewhat taken aback at em going this route in the film

Where could I see those spent efforts? Sorry if it sounds sarcastic, I am just really curious as to where a fan like me can see the current origin. Or is wiki still my best friend in that department?

hasbro headquaters AFAIK.



IIRC when the fall of cybertron lads were putting their pitch together for their game sequel the lads there said the big guys at hasbro were putting together their "bible" for all things TF.

theyre one of the resons were getting any dinobots at all as before teig and co pitched their origin for grimlock and the lads for the game the policy of the company was there was to be no more dinos as "they didnt fit" the direction the brand was going in.

thank fup Teig is such a big grim fan.

Im sure thers a vid of it on youtube somewhere. anyway last i heard the origin is meant to involve a somewhat convoluted version involving primus the thirteen that they hope to get into a comic someday.

Stormrider wrote:

mirageandjazz1197 wrote:

I'm sure I'm not the only one who does not want to see negative comments because they never help and start arguments.

What? Um, wrong. Since when did Seibertron threads become one directional and only allow certain type of comments?

I'm actually in agreement. While I'm not a fan of the silly humor, I do think we can get carried away and probably should take it to another thread or at least wait until the movie comes out.

I'm hoping it will be good. So far it looks good. Now, if Hound squints and lifts his leg to let out a robo-fart at some point in the movie...well...

Optimizzy wrote:

Stormrider wrote:

mirageandjazz1197 wrote:

I'm sure I'm not the only one who does not want to see negative comments because they never help and start arguments.

What? Um, wrong. Since when did Seibertron threads become one directional and only allow certain type of comments?

I'm actually in agreement. While I'm not a fan of the silly humor, I do think we can get carried away and probably should take it to another thread or at least wait until the movie comes out.

I'm hoping it will be good. So far it looks good. Now, if Hound squints and lifts his leg to let out a robo-fart at some point in the movie...well...

There is a difference between going overboard/getting personal and having a discussion. A discussion includes all opinions. What you are suggesting is not a discussion.

I actually have stayed away from the movie threads mostly. I happened to watch this particular trailer and motivated me enough to come to the thread and post a thought. But unless my thought agrees with everyone else's, then I shouldn't post it here? Absurdity!

hinomars19 wrote:Hmmm...wasn't the era that Lio Convoy was active in the same area that Primal's crew came from in Beast Wars?

Nope. That was a longstanding misconception made by the fandom knowing very little real info about BWII and BWNeo and just going off on assumptions and guesses (and wishful thinking in some cases).

See here for more details on this - http://tfwiki.net/wiki/Misconceptions_and_urban_legends_about_Transformers#Beast_Wars

mirageandjazz1197 wrote:Bay humor is no different then anyone else's humor

No, Bay's brand of humor is toilet humor and outlandish over-the-top "trying too hard" humor, and he admitted it himself in the audio commentary of the first movie, in which he discusses the type of humor he likes and assumes other people like it as well. He didn't acknowledge that other people didn't like his kind of humor, only that he has a certain kind of humor that he likes even if it can be crude, weird, or gross.

Bay's type of humor isn't clean or family friendly. He's more "edgy" than that.



As for the whole "make a new thread to bash the movies instead of in here" deal, if one were to do that, then people would just be complaining that the person who made that topic did so just to criticize the movies despite being told to do just that. The only way to satisfy those who like the films is for no one to ever say anything negative about the movies and that's just never going to happen because not everyone liked the movies. So by telling the folks who don't like the movies to go away, that's being oppressive and disrespectful towards them just because they have a different opinion from those who do like these movies.

Stormrider wrote:

Optimizzy wrote:

Stormrider wrote:

mirageandjazz1197 wrote:

I'm sure I'm not the only one who does not want to see negative comments because they never help and start arguments.

What? Um, wrong. Since when did Seibertron threads become one directional and only allow certain type of comments?

I'm actually in agreement. While I'm not a fan of the silly humor, I do think we can get carried away and probably should take it to another thread or at least wait until the movie comes out.

I'm hoping it will be good. So far it looks good. Now, if Hound squints and lifts his leg to let out a robo-fart at some point in the movie...well...

There is a difference between going overboard/getting personal and having a discussion. A discussion includes all opinions. What you are suggesting is not a discussion.

I actually have stayed away from the movie threads mostly. I happened to watch this particular trailer and motivated me enough to come to the thread and post a thought. But unless my thought agrees with everyone else's, then I shouldn't post it here? Absurdity!

No but people dont like seeing posts about hate or dislike of something they enjoyed.

i suck at explaining but you know what i mean......right?

Sabrblade wrote:

hinomars19 wrote:Hmmm...wasn't the era that Lio Convoy was active in the same area that Primal's crew came from in Beast Wars?

Nope. That was a longstanding misconception made by the fandom knowing very little real info about BWII and BWNeo and just going off on assumptions and guesses (and wishful thinking in some cases).

See here for more details on this - http://tfwiki.net/wiki/Misconceptions_and_urban_legends_about_Transformers#Beast_Wars

mirageandjazz1197 wrote:Bay humor is no different then anyone else's humor

No, Bay's brand of humor is toilet humor and outlandish over-the-top "trying too hard" humor, and he admitted it himself in the audio commentary of the first movie, in which he discusses the type of humor he likes and assumes other people like it as well. He didn't acknowledge that other people didn't like his kind of humor, only that he has a certain kind of humor that he likes even if it can be crude, weird, or gross.

Bay's type of humor isn't clean or family friendly. He's more "edgy" than that.



As for the whole "make a new thread to bash the movies instead of in here" deal, if one were to do that, then people would just be complaining that the person who made that topic did so just to criticize the movies despite being told to do just that. The only way to satisfy those who like the films is for no one to ever say anything negative about the movies and that's just never going to happen because not everyone liked the movies. So by telling the folks who don't like the movies to go away, that's being oppressive and disrespectful towards them just because they have a different opinion from those who do like these movies.

Yes I know but I just dont want to hear it anymore it annoys me and I hate it so much you would not even understand it.


I'm not blind to the problems with the movies but does it really matter?

Stormrider wrote:
There is a difference between going overboard/getting personal and having a discussion. A discussion includes all opinions. What you are suggesting is not a discussion.

but, that's exactly what I mean? I'm saying to withhold negative comments that are only there to piss people off. If you don't like the movie, say so that is fine. But I think it's fair to say that it's annoying to go through thirty posts that say the same thing we've heard before.

I mean, if you feel you really need to post the thirty-first post about how Michael Bay is making a bad movie, then do so. I'm not going to stop you, or hate you for it. I just don't know if it's necessary for this thread to be bogged down with it.

RyuNoDeshi0000 wrote:Reminds me of the 80's

Awesome Episode! Memories

mirageandjazz1197 wrote:

Stormrider wrote:

Optimizzy wrote:

Stormrider wrote:

mirageandjazz1197 wrote:

I'm sure I'm not the only one who does not want to see negative comments because they never help and start arguments.

What? Um, wrong. Since when did Seibertron threads become one directional and only allow certain type of comments?

I'm actually in agreement. While I'm not a fan of the silly humor, I do think we can get carried away and probably should take it to another thread or at least wait until the movie comes out.

I'm hoping it will be good. So far it looks good. Now, if Hound squints and lifts his leg to let out a robo-fart at some point in the movie...well...

There is a difference between going overboard/getting personal and having a discussion. A discussion includes all opinions. What you are suggesting is not a discussion.

I actually have stayed away from the movie threads mostly. I happened to watch this particular trailer and motivated me enough to come to the thread and post a thought. But unless my thought agrees with everyone else's, then I shouldn't post it here? Absurdity!

No but people dont like seeing posts about hate or dislike of something they enjoyed.

i suck at explaining but you know what i mean......right?

I understand what you are trying to say and I don't know how to put this any more kindly when I say it is a childish way of thinking to expect that you won't go through a thread, a forum, the news, or the internet without coming across a thought or a person who says something that you don't like.

mirageandjazz1197 wrote:Yes I know but I just dont want to hear it anymore it annoys me and I hate it so much you would not even understand it.

I'm not blind to the problems with the movies but does it really matter?

I get it, you have read a lot of posts in this thread that people are discrediting the movie or Bay. If you are getting tired or upset from reading them, then just skip them. You are not forced to read every post. Or, take a break from the thread. I take a break from threads all the time when I read the same kind of posts over and over. It is really annoying however, when you tell people that they cannot post criticism that you deem as hateful towards the movie.


Moving on, I often wonder if there is something wrong mentally with Michael Bay because of his single style of humor that he puts in the movies. It's like he is obsessed with the toilet humor. Where's Fraud when you need him! There are not varying degrees of humor - it's almost always the same style (sophomoric). I wonder if this is how he views life? Or, if this how he lives his life?

Stormrider wrote:

mirageandjazz1197 wrote:

Stormrider wrote:

Optimizzy wrote:

Stormrider wrote:

mirageandjazz1197 wrote:

I'm sure I'm not the only one who does not want to see negative comments because they never help and start arguments.

What? Um, wrong. Since when did Seibertron threads become one directional and only allow certain type of comments?

I'm actually in agreement. While I'm not a fan of the silly humor, I do think we can get carried away and probably should take it to another thread or at least wait until the movie comes out.

I'm hoping it will be good. So far it looks good. Now, if Hound squints and lifts his leg to let out a robo-fart at some point in the movie...well...

There is a difference between going overboard/getting personal and having a discussion. A discussion includes all opinions. What you are suggesting is not a discussion.

I actually have stayed away from the movie threads mostly. I happened to watch this particular trailer and motivated me enough to come to the thread and post a thought. But unless my thought agrees with everyone else's, then I shouldn't post it here? Absurdity!

No but people dont like seeing posts about hate or dislike of something they enjoyed.

i suck at explaining but you know what i mean......right?

I understand what you are trying to say and I don't know how to put this any more kindly when I say it is a childish way of thinking to expect that you won't go through a thread, a forum, the news, or the internet without coming across a thought or a person who says something that you don't like.

mirageandjazz1197 wrote:Yes I know but I just dont want to hear it anymore it annoys me and I hate it so much you would not even understand it.

I'm not blind to the problems with the movies but does it really matter?

I get it, you have read a lot of posts in this thread that people are discrediting the movie or Bay. If you are getting tired or upset from reading them, then just skip them. You are not forced to read every post. Or, take a break from the thread. I take a break from threads all the time when I read the same kind of posts over and over. It is really annoying however, when you tell people that they cannot post criticism that you deem as hateful towards the movie.


Moving on, I often wonder if there is something wrong mentally with Michael Bay because of his single style of humor that he puts in the movies. It's like he is obsessed with the toilet humor. Where's Fraud when you need him! There are not varying degrees of humor - it's almost always the same style (sophomoric). I wonder if this is how he views life? Or, if this how he lives his life?

Yeah i know i just wish things were diffrent and perfect.



Thank you for the suggestion though its just i have no other things to do i have no other hobbies.

Two new spots yo


In the 2nd video you can see a F-22 briefly at 0:07.... does this mean Starscream comes back?



Well the leaked toy line says he has a toy in the Constructibots movie line.


and so does Shockwave...hmmmmmm.

mirageandjazz1197 wrote:Two new spots yo


In the 2nd video you can see a F-22 briefly at 0:07.... does this mean Starscream comes back?



Well the leaked toy line says he has a toy in the Constructibots movie line.


and so does Shockwave...hmmmmmm.

In that first one at 8:08, that's one of those guys standing behind Lockdown getting shot by some, what looks like some crazy ass toaster with eyes looking thing.

SlyTF1 wrote:

mirageandjazz1197 wrote:Two new spots yo


In the 2nd video you can see a F-22 briefly at 0:07.... does this mean Starscream comes back?



Well the leaked toy line says he has a toy in the Constructibots movie line.


and so does Shockwave...hmmmmmm.

In that first one at 8:08, that's one of those guys standing behind Lockdown getting shot by some, what looks like some crazy ass toaster with eyes looking thing.

What you mean this guy on the right?




Yeah Bay did say in an interview that there will be some things on Lockdowns ship that will make us go Wtf

I think we also said those things wont be explained in this movie but in the future movies (Tf5 is confirmed for 2016 if you dont know).

SlyTF1 wrote:

mirageandjazz1197 wrote:Two new spots yo


In the 2nd video you can see a F-22 briefly at 0:07.... does this mean Starscream comes back?



Well the leaked toy line says he has a toy in the Constructibots movie line.


and so does Shockwave...hmmmmmm.

In that first one at 8:08, that's one of those guys standing behind Lockdown getting shot by some, what looks like some crazy ass toaster with eyes looking thing.

From what I can make out it kinda looks like a Terminator with googly eyes.
Starscream probably will be either resurrected or turned into Cyclonus. Possibly both.

Or it's just ordinary, man made F-22.

As much as i hate the way Starscream died in DotM, i think enough is enough. The only way Starscream could return in the Movie is as Cyclonus, and this isn't very propable, since it's no hint of Cyclonus at all. Megatron's second return is too much for movieverse. Soundwave could rerutn as Stinger, and Starscream as Cyclonus, but no more stricte ressurection. If someone from other movies could return, it's Barricade, because he isn't death in canon (but role of BBB archenemy is already taken by Stinger, so I don't see the point).

TurboMMaster wrote:Or it's just ordinary, man made F-22.

As much as i hate the way Starscream died in DotM, i think enough is enough. The only way Starscream could return in the Movie is as Cyclonus, and this isn't very propable, since it's no hint of Cyclonus at all. Megatron's second return is too much for movieverse. Soundwave could rerutn as Stinger, and Starscream as Cyclonus, but no more stricte ressurection. If someone from other movies could return, it's Barricade, because he isn't death in canon (but role of BBB archenemy is already taken by Stinger, so I don't see the point).

But Barricade died in Dark of the moon and he also killed Que (Wheeljack) in the movie as well.



And why cant Starscream come back as Starscream.


There is more then one way to bring him back.

In movie news, we get two more spots for Transformers: Age of Extinction, still via CBMTrailers, still showing robots and humans with a little new footage in terms of group shots, dialogue snippets and explosions. Check them both out below!

any more spots and they might as well put the movie online.

nhphoto wrote:any more spots and they might as well put the movie online.

I know, it feels very silly.

Va'al wrote:

nhphoto wrote:any more spots and they might as well put the movie online.

I know, it feels very silly.

yeah, i don't want to see any more new clips from the movie.

hopefully these clips are indicative of the amount of robot screen time we'll and not just all of the robot screen time lol.

but still.. there's so much about this movie that we don't know.

the origin of the dinobots, who sent lockdown, what his henchmen are, what lockdown is looking for, why lockdown begins destroying the earth, what happens to galvatron, what happens to the dinobots, what all of the different creatures are on lockdowns ship, and if there are any surprise transformers.. but yeah, i agree that they're starting to show a little too much, as of right now, there are still plenty of questions that these trailers haven't answered.

dragons wrote:[youtube]http://youtu.be/05V3ttZoz3Y[/youtube]

Dance brought back memories of this scene in animated movie

Last time post video on iPhone tablet is better

Dance brought back memories of those G1 episodes with Soundwave.

Ratchets gonna die I just know it...I don't like seeing him bombarded like that

I just realised that there is no scenes with Galvatron in any spot, we can also hear him speaking... I wonder is that means that he's role in movie will be unworthy to mention, or they are planning some big twist with his character...

nhphoto wrote:any more spots and they might as well put the movie online.

It's understable, when you are bad director you need good marketing. I just wonder however why waste money on so many almost identical clips? Why don't use this money to give robot's designs more details for example?

mirageandjazz1197 wrote:But Barricade died in Dark of the moon and he also killed Que (Wheeljack) in the movie as well.

According to one of creators post on Twitter, he was'nt killed but only badly injured. I quess it's enough to cinsder him alive.

And why cant Starscream come back as Starscream.


There is more then one way to bring him back.

From the same reason why Jazz, Blackout, Ironhide ot any other character (except for Megatron, witch shouldn't die in first place). TIf they die, they should stay dead, otherwise, death would be too cheap to be taken seriously.

Also, Starscream suffered a lot of badass decay in the series. In first, he take both Ironhide and Ratchet down with no problem. In RotF, he was was all time kicked around Megatron's pet. And in third he was killed in very pathetic way (Even if it still was better death than Megatron's). It had his moment's of glory, but if Starwscream would back, I quess why would only get more badass decay scenes.

Sory for double post, I cliked on "Sumbit" because of habit .

I don't mind the TV ads but I guess I am getting tired of seeing the same thing over and over. They seem like 95% is the same stuff with maybe a second or two of new stuff.

My fun can't be spoiled though. My son and I are so excited to see the movie next week that even if a full run down of the movie popped up somewhere, I would read it and still have a blast when I went to the movie. Granted, I read all of the movies novels that came out before the movies too (I think 2 of them did - I remember reading DOTM 3 days before the movie actually came out) so it's darn near impossible to spoil it for me.

TurboMMaster wrote:

mirageandjazz1197 wrote:But Barricade died in Dark of the moon and he also killed Que (Wheeljack) in the movie as well.

According to one of creators post on Twitter, he was'nt killed but only badly injured. I quess it's enough to cinsder him alive.

And why cant Starscream come back as Starscream.


There is more then one way to bring him back.

From the same reason why Jazz, Blackout, Ironhide ot any other character (except for Megatron, witch shouldn't die in first place). TIf they die, they should stay dead, otherwise, death would be too cheap to be taken seriously.

Also, Starscream suffered a lot of badass decay in the series. In first, he take both Ironhide and Ratchet down with no problem. In RotF, he was was all time kicked around Megatron's pet. And in third he was killed in very pathetic way (Even if it still was better death than Megatron's). It had his moment's of glory, but if Starwscream would back, I quess why would only get more badass decay scenes.

Sory for double post, I cliked on "Sumbit" because of habit .

No smart guy your talking about the prequel comic rising storm (Where Shockwave killed Jolt and others)



in the actual movie he dies by getting his head shot at by humans.

nhphoto wrote:any more spots and they might as well put the movie online.

Bullshit



You have seen less then 10 minutes of the movie and non of it is spoilers as far.

mirageandjazz1197 wrote:

nhphoto wrote:any more spots and they might as well put the movie online.

Bullshit

Sarcasm, dude. >:oP

Another new spot






Edit: for some dumb reason the youtube links not working for this sites youtube button so i'm just going to leave a link


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wLkv3UP ... e=youtu.be