In-Hand Images of Transformers: The Last Knight Shadow Spark Optimus Prime
Thursday, January 12th, 2017 1:40PM CST
Categories: Movie Related News, Toy NewsPosted by: D-Maximal_Primal Views: 42,083
Topic Options: View Discussion · Sign in or Join to reply
You can check out the in-hand images of the figure below, which include a couple of comparisons. Let us know what you think in the comments section below!
News Search
Got Transformers News? Let us know here!
Most Popular Transformers News
Most Recent Transformers News
Posted by D-Maximal_Primal on January 12th, 2017 @ 1:42pm CST
I'm really hoping for a Knight MP. I really want it
Posted by william-james88 on January 12th, 2017 @ 1:57pm CST
Posted by DeathReviews on January 12th, 2017 @ 2:12pm CST
Posted by william-james88 on January 12th, 2017 @ 2:30pm CST
Posted by Emerje on January 12th, 2017 @ 3:02pm CST
william-james88 wrote:Quantumhawk, a retired Allspark staff, has found a price tag for the upcoming Voyager Class toys from Transformers: The Last Knight. There is a significant price increase with the price being $29.99. We also learn the DPCI number, which is 087-06-7326. You can use this number at customer service if ever you want to know if there is any stock in the store. While we don't know how premature this price tag is, it does mean that Target is getting ready for the Last Knight figures so they mght be coming sooner than we think.
This is most certainly the tag for the Premier Edition Optimus Prime which isn't unusual to have a higher price than the rest of the line. We're still many months away from release, which will likely have a street date attached (late April, early May?) rather than just randomly showing up like other TF lines.
Emerje
Posted by Randomhero on January 12th, 2017 @ 3:13pm CST
Posted by Bounti76 on January 12th, 2017 @ 3:19pm CST
Posted by william-james88 on January 12th, 2017 @ 3:23pm CST
Randomhero wrote:This a tweet from peaugh himself a couple days ago
https://mobile.twitter.com/Peaugh/media
You should have reported it then.
Posted by Megatron Wolf on January 12th, 2017 @ 6:22pm CST
Posted by Dagon on January 12th, 2017 @ 10:09pm CST
Posted by Solrac333 on January 12th, 2017 @ 10:13pm CST
Posted by Nexus Knight on January 13th, 2017 @ 12:42am CST
Posted by Braker on January 13th, 2017 @ 2:02am CST
Posted by Insurgent on January 13th, 2017 @ 5:18am CST
And unless we get an MP Barricade, I think that'll be all I get in terms of movie toys.
Posted by Evil Eye on January 13th, 2017 @ 7:17am CST
Regarding the prices, bear in mind that in this country, Deluxes are now £20 and Voyagers £30, so you guys can consider yourselves lucky. Especially as this price hike means that the prices over here are almost certainly going up too.
Posted by Kurona on January 13th, 2017 @ 2:51pm CST
D-Maximus_Prime wrote:Short answer: Soon! Longer answer: The Masterpiece Bumblebee figure was created for ages 8 and up, and is slated for release in summer 2017. It has an MSRP of $79.99.
This bit makes me laugh. Yes, that's right, give your $80 Masterpiece figure to your 8 year old.
Posted by D-Maximal_Primal on January 13th, 2017 @ 3:00pm CST
Although, seeing as how he is based on his first movie body, I imagine that means Prime will also be based on his first movie self, either as another release of the RotF leader or as a new figure similar to it. If that happens, no thanks, I'm good. I still want a really good knight Prime, but if it is his first movie self, at least it definitely saves me some money for a potential really good Barricade (if that is him)
Posted by william-james88 on January 13th, 2017 @ 3:01pm CST
D-Maximus_Prime wrote:I'm still really stoked for an MP Bumblebee. I will get this thing, That is fact.
Although, seeing as how he is based on his first movie body
... in bot mode only. For some reason, they didnt give him the right car mode.
Posted by Sigma Magnus on January 13th, 2017 @ 3:05pm CST
william-james88 wrote:D-Maximus_Prime wrote:I'm still really stoked for an MP Bumblebee. I will get this thing, That is fact.
Although, seeing as how he is based on his first movie body
... in bot mode only. For some reason, they didnt give him the right car mode.
How so?
Posted by william-james88 on January 13th, 2017 @ 3:08pm CST
Sigma Magnus wrote:william-james88 wrote:D-Maximus_Prime wrote:I'm still really stoked for an MP Bumblebee. I will get this thing, That is fact.
Although, seeing as how he is based on his first movie body
... in bot mode only. For some reason, they didnt give him the right car mode.
How so?
in the movie, BB is a concept camarro, and instead of doing that they gave him the 2010 camaro model.
Posted by D-Maximal_Primal on January 13th, 2017 @ 3:19pm CST
william-james88 wrote:Sigma Magnus wrote:william-james88 wrote:D-Maximus_Prime wrote:I'm still really stoked for an MP Bumblebee. I will get this thing, That is fact.
Although, seeing as how he is based on his first movie body
... in bot mode only. For some reason, they didnt give him the right car mode.
How so?
in the movie, BB is a concept camarro, and instead of doing that they gave him the 2007 camaro model,so the actual car that was out that year.
That car mode is identical to the one he got in the 2007 movie. I'm not really sure why you think they're different?
Posted by william-james88 on January 13th, 2017 @ 3:29pm CST
D-Maximus_Prime wrote:That car mode is identical to the one he got in the 2007 movie. I'm not really sure why you think they're different?
Because they are.
In the film, he transforms into a 2006 concept camaro, but this toy transforms into a 2010-2013 Camaro SS.
Posted by Deadput on January 13th, 2017 @ 3:34pm CST
Posted by william-james88 on January 13th, 2017 @ 3:35pm CST
Deadput wrote:The cars hardly look different in those photos so who cares really?
I know I dont, I was just reporting it in case anyone did.
Posted by D-Maximal_Primal on January 13th, 2017 @ 3:36pm CST
william-james88 wrote:D-Maximus_Prime wrote:That car mode is identical to the one he got in the 2007 movie. I'm not really sure why you think they're different?
Because they are.
In the film, he transforms into a 2006 concept camaro, but this toy transforms into a 2010-2013 Camaro SS.
D-Maximus_Prime: Newspost from Pulse wrote:Much like in the first Transformers live action movie, Bumblebee converts from his dynamic, Autobot scout form into a 2006 Chevy Camaro concept car.
Posted by Jeddostotle7 on January 13th, 2017 @ 4:01pm CST
D-Maximus_Prime wrote:william-james88 wrote:D-Maximus_Prime wrote:That car mode is identical to the one he got in the 2007 movie. I'm not really sure why you think they're different?
Because they are.
In the film, he transforms into a 2006 concept camaro, but this toy transforms into a 2010-2013 Camaro SS.D-Maximus_Prime: Newspost from Pulse wrote:Much like in the first Transformers live action movie, Bumblebee converts from his dynamic, Autobot scout form into a 2006 Chevy Camaro concept car.
Some of the details look closer to the 2010-2013 Camaro SS, but as many, if not more, are closer to the actual '06 Concept Camaro.
Posted by Deadput on January 13th, 2017 @ 4:11pm CST
william-james88 wrote:Deadput wrote:The cars hardly look different in those photos so who cares really?
I know I dont, I was just reporting it in case anyone did.
I don't know what to say to the people who actually care about minor differences most people would never notice.
At least he doesn't transform into something drastically different like lets say this
Also for the people who are going to complain about the price this is the normal price for Hasbro masterpiece car bots.
Posted by ScottyP on January 13th, 2017 @ 7:04pm CST
Posted by Sabrblade on January 13th, 2017 @ 7:07pm CST
Yep. Completely new mold based specifically on the 2007 Movie 1 Bumblebee's CG model, and seems to be around the size of the G1 MP Autobot Cars.ScottyP wrote:So wait, this is a new mold?
Posted by Jelze Bunnycat on January 13th, 2017 @ 8:51pm CST
Slug was a Ceratopsian. Age of Extinction has exclusives as redecos of older figures. Thus:
Posted by Carnivius_Prime on January 14th, 2017 @ 3:17am CST
"Does it convert?" "Does it ever!" No, it transforms. IT TRANSFORMS. SAY IT! hehe. yeah i know the reasons why they don't but it still amuses me.
Posted by Jeddostotle7 on January 14th, 2017 @ 3:26am CST
Carnivius_Prime wrote:"Does it convert?" "Does it ever!" No, it transforms. IT TRANSFORMS. SAY IT! hehe. yeah i know the reasons why they don't but it still amuses me.
I've never been entirely clear on why they can't say "transform". What's stopping them?
Posted by RAR on January 14th, 2017 @ 5:44am CST
Also It makes you wonder if Takara make their own version would it have bonus shoulder rocket launchers on it (perhaps as an Amazon exclusive) ?
Also the original (and the production model) have a black B pillar and the toy has a yellow one.
Jeddostotle7 wrote:Carnivius_Prime wrote:"Does it convert?" "Does it ever!" No, it transforms. IT TRANSFORMS. SAY IT! hehe. yeah i know the reasons why they don't but it still amuses me.
I've never been entirely clear on why they can't say "transform". What's stopping them?
Perhaps this will help :
From The Wiki : http://tfwiki.net/wiki/Trademark
Hasbro has realised that using the word "transform" as a verb to describe the process of changing a Transformers toy from one mode into another one would make the brand name "Transformers" descriptive, making the mark indefensible. The end result would have been a loss of the mark Transformers as a registered trademark, allowing competitors to use it as a generic term for their shape-shifting robot toys and thus creating further confusion among parents when asked to buy a Transformer.
As a consequence, the use of "transform" as a verb when being used to describe Transformers product is almost strictly forbidden in certain written materials:[4] If it's a toy that "converts", Hasbro can argue that Transformers is not merely a descriptive term, thus allowing for trademark protection to persist. Although this mandate does not extend to character dialogue within fiction, synonyms like "convert" (or simply "change") are used in Hasbro's own products (like packaging call-outs and instructions) and in licensees' products (such as game guides). Even the novels Transformers: Exodus and Transformers: Exiles, unusually for actual fiction, avoid using "transform" as a verb - always replaced with either "proto-form" (the first usage of such term as a verb) or "alt-form", depending on the mode into which a Cybertronian is shifting.
As a matter of fact, "Transformer" (specifically "with a capital initial") is listed in the Oxford English Dictionary as a description of "a type of children's toy, first manufactured in Japan, consisting of a model robot which can be transformed into another toy". However, since the term is identified as a "proprietary name" and Hasbro is specifically mentioned in the name etymology, the entry makes it pretty clear that the term is not a catch-all description of a general product type, but tied to a specific manufacturer, hence posing no threat to Hasbro's exclusive claim of the trademark.[5] The fact that the entry has been in the dictionary since 1993 also implies that Hasbro has never seen any need for intervention. (The same dictionary also has an entry for Mattel's "Barbie", for that matter.)
Many Hasbro competitors have used "transform" as a verb on their toy packaging in the past. More recently, however, some such as Mattel and LEGO have changed (ha ha) to using terms like "convert" and "shift" instead. Whether this is due to Hasbro legal intervention is, at the moment, pure conjecture.
Posted by Stuartmaximus on January 14th, 2017 @ 10:50am CST
http://www.transformertoys.co.uk/transf ... dule/12882
Posted by RAR on January 14th, 2017 @ 11:06am CST
But that said what is wrapped around the earth may not be Cybertron alone and there is likely more to it than that.
Posted by Evil Eye on January 14th, 2017 @ 11:24am CST
Posted by Va'al on January 15th, 2017 @ 5:44pm CST
JelZe GoldRabbit wrote:O, don't mind me, just leaving this for you all to consider:
Slug was a Ceratopsian. Age of Extinction has exclusives as redecos of older figures. Thus:
Guess who's back.
Back again.
Dinopope.
Here again.
Posted by Insurgent on January 16th, 2017 @ 6:49am CST
And yeah, Dinopope is my guess for the Dinobot combiner. But please don't let them combine on screen. Unless there's a Decepticon combiner, in which case we can have a combiner fight.
Posted by william-james88 on January 16th, 2017 @ 8:13am CST
Insurgent wrote:This is the third time today I've read the guess who's back song on various websites. Heh. Guess someone's making a comeback.
And yeah, Dinopope is my guess for the Dinobot combiner. But please don't let them combine on screen. Unless there's a Decepticon combiner, in which case we can have a combiner fight.
This movie is already ultra stuffed as it is, pretty sure we wont have any combiners, especially when all sources state Onslaught is the only combaticon in the film and thatthe only Dinobot with "major" screen presence is Grimlock.
These toys are just easy exclusives to give to stores. With AOE, almost all exclusives were just redecos of previous toys.
Posted by Sabrblade on January 16th, 2017 @ 8:17am CST
Is he even a "Combaticon" for certain in the film?william-james88 wrote:Insurgent wrote:This is the third time today I've read the guess who's back song on various websites. Heh. Guess someone's making a comeback.
And yeah, Dinopope is my guess for the Dinobot combiner. But please don't let them combine on screen. Unless there's a Decepticon combiner, in which case we can have a combiner fight.
This movie is already ultra stuffed as it is, pretty sure we wont have any combiners, especially when all sources state Onslaught is the only combaticon in the film and thatthe only Dinobot with "major" screen presence is Grimlock.
Like, I mean, Brawl was in the first movie but not as a Combaticon. Nor was Bonecrusher a Constructicon.
Posted by william-james88 on January 16th, 2017 @ 8:36am CST
Sabrblade wrote:Is he even a "Combaticon" for certain in the film?william-james88 wrote:Insurgent wrote:This is the third time today I've read the guess who's back song on various websites. Heh. Guess someone's making a comeback.
And yeah, Dinopope is my guess for the Dinobot combiner. But please don't let them combine on screen. Unless there's a Decepticon combiner, in which case we can have a combiner fight.
This movie is already ultra stuffed as it is, pretty sure we wont have any combiners, especially when all sources state Onslaught is the only combaticon in the film and thatthe only Dinobot with "major" screen presence is Grimlock.
Like, I mean, Brawl was in the first movie but not as a Combaticon. Nor was Bonecrusher a Constructicon.
He isnt labeled as a combaticon, I was just using that word forus here in the context that the moveonly had one member of a team we know tocombine in different media.
Posted by Kurona on January 16th, 2017 @ 9:26am CST
Which, by the way, is fine.
Posted by Stuartmaximus on January 16th, 2017 @ 9:44am CST
Insurgent wrote:This is the third time today I've read the guess who's back song on various websites. Heh. Guess someone's making a comeback.
And yeah, Dinopope is my guess for the Dinobot combiner. But please don't let them combine on screen. Unless there's a Decepticon combiner, in which case we can have a combiner fight.
Well the recent movie toy lists(TRU & UK) suggests that we ARE getting a combiner(of which one of the dinobots are included in. as a 6th figure) so my guess is that at LEAST in toy form we'll prob get a mini dinobot combiner, as for Onslaught moviewise we'll prob only see him & not his Combaticon buddies, but toywise...it's possible we could get all the Combaticons...and maybe they could combine(but don't quote me on that though!) coz remember...in the previous tf movie toylines we've had figures that never appeared in the films(Stratosphere, Air Raid to name but a few).
Posted by Insurgent on January 16th, 2017 @ 9:53am CST
I'm fine if there are no combiners and it's just exclusive toys like the last. To be honest, I wasn't following the AOE toys that closely. Lockdown, Galvatron and the onscreen dinobots were all I got.
Posted by william-james88 on January 16th, 2017 @ 9:55am CST
Stuartmaximus wrote:(of which one of the dinobots are included in. as a 6th figure)
It doesnt say that. The listing says, 5 part combiner with slug, which could mean that slug is the main part of the 5 part combiner. ust like in combiner wars when we look at the custom combinations we made and we say we made a 5 member combiner with skylynx. Skylynx is not a 6th member, he`s the torso, we just identify the combiner as being done with skylynx sicne he is the main bot.
Posted by william-james88 on January 16th, 2017 @ 9:59am CST
Insurgent wrote:To be honest, I wasn't following the AOE toys that closely. Lockdown, Galvatron and the onscreen dinobots were all I got.
Thats too bad because the better toys happened to be the autobots this time around, with Hound and Evasion Mode Prime. Although I do like Galvatron for what they were trying to do and convey.
Posted by Insurgent on January 16th, 2017 @ 10:49am CST
william-james88 wrote:Insurgent wrote:To be honest, I wasn't following the AOE toys that closely. Lockdown, Galvatron and the onscreen dinobots were all I got.
Thats too bad because the better toys happened to be the autobots this time around, with Hound and Evasion Mode Prime. Although I do like Galvatron for what they were trying to do and convey.
Oh yeah. Forgot I had evasion mode prime. Actually, I got him twice. The original release and the twin pack with classics Prime. Ha! Can't believe I forgot them, they are sweet figures.
As for Hound... The only time I saw him on shelf was long after the movie had been and gone (wave 2 voyagers were really, really late at getting released) and my mate got the last one. Which I was fine with because that was the day I picked up Galvatron. That reminds me, Galvatron is on my customise list.
Posted by william-james88 on January 16th, 2017 @ 11:09am CST
Posted by Silverwing on January 16th, 2017 @ 5:36pm CST
Posted by Bumblebee21 on January 17th, 2017 @ 11:13am CST