Age Of Extinction's British Board Of Film Classification Confirms An Even Longer Running Time

Friday, June 20th, 2014 4:23AM CDT

Category: Movie Related News
Posted by: Autobot032 Views: 14,544

Topic Options: View Discussion · Sign in or Join to reply

It's now official, Age Of Extinction is the longest of the film franchise, clocking in at a bladder busting 2 hours, 45 minutes! It was previously reported by Michael Bay himself, that the film would be 2.5 hours, sans credits.

With this new running time confirmed, you may need to plan your filmgoing experience a bit differently, especially if you have kids in tow.

Age Of Extinction will release on June 27th, with midnight showings on the evening of the 26th. The finer details of the classification are as follows:

TRANSFORMERS: AGE OF EXTINCTION [2D]

TYPE OF MEDIA Film

APPROVED RUNNING TIME 164m 54s

BBFCINSIGHT moderate action violence, infrequent strong language

GENRE(S) Action, Fantasy, Science Fiction

DIRECTOR(S) Michael Bay

CAST INCLUDES Mark Wahlberg, Nicola Peltz, T.J. Miller, Sophia Myles, Stanley Tucci, Kelsey Grammer, Titus Welliver

CUT This work was passed uncut.

You can see the full webpage by clicking on the image below:

Keep your optics tuned to Seibertron.com for the latest in news and updates, plus the best galleries around!

Credit(s): BBFC

News Search

Got Transformers News? Let us know here!

Most Recent Transformers News

Energon Universe, Transformers #8, Facsimiles, X-Men 97, New TF toys + more @ Seibertron Store

Posted 4 days ago

RUMOUR: Transformers Earthspark to End After Season 2, Replaced with a New Show

Posted 6 days ago

Click here to post your comment about this news story!

Re: Age Of Extinction's British Board Of Film Classification Confirms An Even Longer Running Time (1583977)
Posted by BERSEKAEL on June 20th, 2014 @ 4:42am CDT

I guess I will go for a burger and a soda couple hours before, so I can watch it with no interruption... I can't wait for it!

Re: Age Of Extinction's British Board Of Film Classification Confirms An Even Longer Running Time (1583989)
Posted by dragons on June 20th, 2014 @ 6:43am CDT

mirageandjazz1197 wrote:
Autobot032 wrote:
Rodimus Prime wrote:It works, you just don't know how to do it.

Don't antagonize. Stop it. And just so you know, he does indeed know how to use it. Like he says below, he has several news credits because of it. Quit picking on people.

mirageandjazz1197 wrote:
Rodimus Prime wrote:
mirageandjazz1197 wrote:Another new spot

Simple msiteak glad it wasnt me who post it I did that on iphone screw it have delete entire link to fix tablets easy edit stuff with.

Anks for sharing

Edit: for some dumb reason the youtube links not working for this sites youtube button so i'm just going to leave a link

It works, you just don't know how to do it.

As for the spot, Air Grimlock FTW!

Seems like there will be a lot of ass-kicking in this movie. I bought my advance ticket today. Bring it on!

"you just don't know how to do it."

look at my news credit i did know how to do it.

maybe the video was to new (it was 12 minutes old when i tried to post it)

I see what the error was and it was very easy to miss.

You posted this YouTube code: wLkv3UPoq
This is the one that worked: wLkv3UPoq-Q
The -Q part is what threw you off, it did it to me, too. In the future, if you're not sure where the code begins or ends, try this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v= wLkv3UPoq-Q &playlist See where I bolded? The code starts after the = sign and before the ampersand. As long as you get all of the gibberish between those two, the coding will work. Dashes included. Like I said, it was easy to miss and I almost did it myself.

And thank you for sharing this new ad. I'll get on it and you'll have a new news credit!

EDIT: Never mind. Mindmaster got it. He should also give you credit for it, because you were the one who brought it to our attention, even though CBM was the original source. So, 'master, git crackin'!

Alright thank you sir!

You know this site is not as bad as i thought it was recently oh and posilbe spoiler Starscream is getting a toy i dont know which thread this belongs in

source https://www.facebook.com/groups/17611371999/

Re: Age Of Extinction's British Board Of Film Classification Confirms An Even Longer Running Time (1583995)
Posted by william-james88 on June 20th, 2014 @ 7:38am CDT

dragons wrote:

Alright thank you sir!

You know this site is not as bad as i thought it was recently oh and posilbe spoiler Starscream is getting a toy i dont know which thread this belongs in

In the toy thread. This news has already been talked about a bunch there. The specific thread is Official AOE Prodicts discussion thread.

Re: Age Of Extinction's British Board Of Film Classification Confirms An Even Longer Running Time (1584011)
Posted by Rodimus Prime on June 20th, 2014 @ 8:38am CDT

2:45???

So with presumed 20-30 mins. of previews, it's gonna be over 3 hours?

Re: Age Of Extinction's British Board Of Film Classification Confirms An Even Longer Running Time (1584020)
Posted by Deadput on June 20th, 2014 @ 8:54am CDT

william-james88 wrote:
dragons wrote:

Alright thank you sir!

You know this site is not as bad as i thought it was recently oh and posilbe spoiler Starscream is getting a toy i dont know which thread this belongs in

In the toy thread. This news has already been talked about a bunch there. The specific thread is Official AOE Prodicts discussion thread.

Even though that is actually my post and this guy quoted it for no reason

he was not even responding he just necessarily bumped the post.

Anyways new clip of glorious arse shots and all that (briefly anyways but people are making a big deal)

Re: Age Of Extinction's British Board Of Film Classification Confirms An Even Longer Running Time (1584040)
Posted by Deadput on June 20th, 2014 @ 9:43am CDT

Holy crap the new shots in this is amazing

Is Stinger hijacking Strafe?

Re: Age Of Extinction's British Board Of Film Classification Confirms An Even Longer Running Time (1584050)
Posted by Deadput on June 20th, 2014 @ 10:15am CDT

Some good shots of Bee nothing new just extended scenes but Jesus that shot of Bee grappling the boat and that eyegasmic turn.

best movie 11/10

Re: Age Of Extinction's British Board Of Film Classification Confirms An Even Longer Running Time (1584057)
Posted by Deadput on June 20th, 2014 @ 10:26am CDT

GM’s top designer, Ed Welburn to cameo in AOE?

http://www.detroitnews.com/article/20140619/AUTO0103/306190098/1361/GM-designer-may-appear-in--Transformers--Age-of-Extinction-

Re: Age Of Extinction's British Board Of Film Classification Confirms An Even Longer Running Time (1584060)
Posted by El Duque on June 20th, 2014 @ 10:35am CDT

We have a trio of new Transformers: Age of Extinction clips to share this morning. The first two come to us from CBM Trailers, and the third from Chevrolet's Official YouTube Channel. The fist is a clip from the film featuring Cade, Tessa, and Lucas, the second another IMAX featurette, the third is really more of a commercial for the 2014 Camaro, but contains footage. Check 'em out embedded below:

Update: Fourth clip from Fandango added.

Re: Age Of Extinction's British Board Of Film Classification Confirms An Even Longer Running Time (1584077)
Posted by william-james88 on June 20th, 2014 @ 11:04am CDT

Did you guys see this clip yet, from Bleeding Cool?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=LA7XPh47W0c

This is the article it is from

http://www.bleedingcool.com/2014/06/19/mark-wahlberg-gives-sherlock-holmes-a-run-for-his-money-in-this-clip-from-transformers-age-of-extinction/

Re: Age Of Extinction's British Board Of Film Classification Confirms An Even Longer Running Time (1584136)
Posted by Nemesis Maximo on June 20th, 2014 @ 2:47pm CDT

Holy crap-sticks! That is a LONG movie.

Re: Age Of Extinction's British Board Of Film Classification Confirms An Even Longer Running Time (1584232)
Posted by Gemini220 on June 20th, 2014 @ 9:38pm CDT

164m 54s... fine with me, I'll be getting my moneys worth especially seeing it in IMAX.

Re: Age Of Extinction's British Board Of Film Classification Confirms An Even Longer Running Time (1584239)
Posted by VirusCarnage on June 20th, 2014 @ 10:04pm CDT

I don't think this one spot has been posted before (I could be wrong)

Re: Age Of Extinction's British Board Of Film Classification Confirms An Even Longer Running Time (1584285)
Posted by Deadput on June 21st, 2014 @ 3:39am CDT

^ Its not new except in hd friend.

Anyways i have a new spot not much in new footage but it has some extended shots

Re: Age Of Extinction's British Board Of Film Classification Confirms An Even Longer Running Time (1584321)
Posted by Rodimus Prime on June 21st, 2014 @ 7:58am CDT

Wasn't the world premiere supposed to be this week in China? I thought it was gonna be the 19th.

Re: Age Of Extinction's British Board Of Film Classification Confirms An Even Longer Running Time (1584328)
Posted by william-james88 on June 21st, 2014 @ 8:44am CDT

That shot of Drift is awesome!

Re: Age Of Extinction's British Board Of Film Classification Confirms An Even Longer Running Time (1584681)
Posted by Autobot032 on June 22nd, 2014 @ 3:36am CDT

Rodimus Prime wrote:Wasn't the world premiere supposed to be this week in China? I thought it was gonna be the 19th.

Indeed it was. I'm surprised we haven't heard any reviews hit the internet yet. I'm downright shocked, actually. I was expecting someone to come on here and spoil the whole dang thing, but to my surprise, no one has yet.

I'm impressed. I like it. I don't want to be spoiled. For once, this is a TF film I want to go into with no foreknowledge of much of anything. I blew it with DOTM. I read the novel beforehand. Like an idiot.

Re: Age Of Extinction's British Board Of Film Classification Confirms An Even Longer Running Time (1584721)
Posted by Rodimus Prime on June 22nd, 2014 @ 7:18am CDT

Autobot032 wrote:
Rodimus Prime wrote:Wasn't the world premiere supposed to be this week in China? I thought it was gonna be the 19th.

Indeed it was. I'm surprised we haven't heard any reviews hit the internet yet. I'm downright shocked, actually. I was expecting someone to come on here and spoil the whole dang thing, but to my surprise, no one has yet.

Yeah, that's exactly why I was wondering. I figured someone would have said something by now, even if it was overhyped fanwank. No word even on the performance by Imagine Dragons after (or was it before?) the premiere.

I'm impressed. I like it. I don't want to be spoiled. For once, this is a TF film I want to go into with no foreknowledge of much of anything.

I agree 100%. Especially since there will be very little to nothing to do with the previous 3.

I blew it with DOTM. I read the novel beforehand. Like an idiot.

That's another thing. I have all of the novels of the movies so far (and even the prequels to them) and I couldn't find the novel for Age of Extinction. There must not be 1.

Re: Age Of Extinction's British Board Of Film Classification Confirms An Even Longer Running Time (1584724)
Posted by SlyTF1 on June 22nd, 2014 @ 7:22am CDT

Autobot032 wrote:
Rodimus Prime wrote:Wasn't the world premiere supposed to be this week in China? I thought it was gonna be the 19th.

Indeed it was. I'm surprised we haven't heard any reviews hit the internet yet. I'm downright shocked, actually. I was expecting someone to come on here and spoil the whole dang thing, but to my surprise, no one has yet.

I'm impressed. I like it. I don't want to be spoiled. For once, this is a TF film I want to go into with no foreknowledge of much of anything. I blew it with DOTM. I read the novel beforehand. Like an idiot.

I read a review. I didn't read too much of it, because I didn't want to be spoiled, though. I remember 2 distinctive minor spoilers, but that's it.

Re: Age Of Extinction's British Board Of Film Classification Confirms An Even Longer Running Time (1584780)
Posted by 5150 Cruiser on June 22nd, 2014 @ 11:55am CDT

Autobot032 wrote:
Rodimus Prime wrote:Wasn't the world premiere supposed to be this week in China? I thought it was gonna be the 19th.

Indeed it was. I'm surprised we haven't heard any reviews hit the internet yet. I'm downright shocked, actually. I was expecting someone to come on here and spoil the whole dang thing, but to my surprise, no one has yet.

I'm impressed. I like it. I don't want to be spoiled. For once, this is a TF film I want to go into with no foreknowledge of much of anything. I blew it with DOTM. I read the novel beforehand. Like an idiot.

I'm with you 100%. This is the first of the series that i haven't been spoiled (enless you count the Tv spot of Lockdown talking to Prime; but i really don't count that as anything spoilish).
So i hope those that saw it keep quiet till at least the weekend. :grin:

Re: Age Of Extinction's British Board Of Film Classification Confirms An Even Longer Running Time (1584884)
Posted by william-james88 on June 22nd, 2014 @ 6:10pm CDT

5150 Cruiser wrote:
Autobot032 wrote:
Rodimus Prime wrote:Wasn't the world premiere supposed to be this week in China? I thought it was gonna be the 19th.

Indeed it was. I'm surprised we haven't heard any reviews hit the internet yet. I'm downright shocked, actually. I was expecting someone to come on here and spoil the whole dang thing, but to my surprise, no one has yet.

I'm impressed. I like it. I don't want to be spoiled. For once, this is a TF film I want to go into with no foreknowledge of much of anything. I blew it with DOTM. I read the novel beforehand. Like an idiot.

I'm with you 100%. This is the first of the series that i haven't been spoiled (enless you count the Tv spot of Lockdown talking to Prime; but i really don't count that as anything spoilish).
So i hope those that saw it keep quiet till at least the weekend.

Sure but if anyone wants to read the reviews, here they are:

http://www.mtv.com/news/1852304/transformers-age-of-extinction-early-reviews/

Re: Age Of Extinction's British Board Of Film Classification Confirms An Even Longer Running Time (1584889)
Posted by SlyTF1 on June 22nd, 2014 @ 6:28pm CDT

william-james88 wrote:
5150 Cruiser wrote:
Autobot032 wrote:
Rodimus Prime wrote:Wasn't the world premiere supposed to be this week in China? I thought it was gonna be the 19th.

Indeed it was. I'm surprised we haven't heard any reviews hit the internet yet. I'm downright shocked, actually. I was expecting someone to come on here and spoil the whole dang thing, but to my surprise, no one has yet.

I'm impressed. I like it. I don't want to be spoiled. For once, this is a TF film I want to go into with no foreknowledge of much of anything. I blew it with DOTM. I read the novel beforehand. Like an idiot.

I'm with you 100%. This is the first of the series that i haven't been spoiled (enless you count the Tv spot of Lockdown talking to Prime; but i really don't count that as anything spoilish).
So i hope those that saw it keep quiet till at least the weekend.

Sure but if anyone wants to read the reviews, here they are:

http://www.mtv.com/news/1852304/transformers-age-of-extinction-early-reviews/

Are there any spoilers in these reviews? I read some of the first one, but I stopped to avoid spoilers.

Re: Age Of Extinction's British Board Of Film Classification Confirms An Even Longer Running Time (1584897)
Posted by william-james88 on June 22nd, 2014 @ 6:59pm CDT

SlyTF1 wrote:

I'm with you 100%. This is the first of the series that i haven't been spoiled (enless you count the Tv spot of Lockdown talking to Prime; but i really don't count that as anything spoilish).
So i hope those that saw it keep quiet till at least the weekend.

Sure but if anyone wants to read the reviews, here they are:

http://www.mtv.com/news/1852304/transformers-age-of-extinction-early-reviews/

Are there any spoilers in these reviews? I read some of the first one, but I stopped to avoid spoilers.

The link is only to exerpts of the reviews and they are spoiler free. I do not know about the reviews themselves as I have yet to read them. What I find baffling is the quote from one review saying that BumbleBee adds MUCH NEEDED comic relief to the film. I would have NEVER expected a transformers Michael Bay film to be much in need of humour, so that statement means a lot. All we need to know is that so far, everyone who has seen it has liked it overall and thats good enough for me.

Re: Age Of Extinction's British Board Of Film Classification Confirms An Even Longer Running Time (1584900)
Posted by william-james88 on June 22nd, 2014 @ 7:22pm CDT

Oh man, you guys have no idea how happy I am to read this quick spoiler free quote from a reviewer:

"It’s not just that the Autobots look more distinctive and easier to tell apart than ever in “Transformers: Age of Extinction” — as Optimus Prime never tires of reminding us, these robots have actual souls. So who cares if the human characters are even more dispensable and the plot even more scattershot than usual? Resurrected to take on man-made knock-offs of themselves, these metallic superheroes cause so much destruction, it’s as if they’re trying to find a literal new definition for the term “blockbuster” — and indeed, as in the 2007-11 trilogy, which raked in $2.6 billion globally, helmer Michael Bay continues to evolve ways to make robotic shape-shifting look increasingly seamless and realistic in 3D."

All I ever wanted was for the robots to be the stars of the film and to be able to follow them and the action and it looks like finally I will have this simple wish come true.

Re: Age Of Extinction's British Board Of Film Classification Confirms An Even Longer Running Time (1584903)
Posted by SlyTF1 on June 22nd, 2014 @ 7:45pm CDT

william-james88 wrote:
SlyTF1 wrote:Are there any spoilers in these reviews? I read some of the first one, but I stopped to avoid spoilers.

The link is only to exerpts of the reviews and they are spoiler free. I do not know about the reviews themselves as I have yet to read them. What I find baffling is the quote from one review saying that BumbleBee adds MUCH NEEDED comic relief to the film. I would have NEVER expected a transformers Michael Bay film to be much in need of humour, so that statement means a lot. All we need to know is that so far, everyone who has seen it has liked it overall and thats good enough for me.

Yeah, I meant the actual reviews. I skilled through them, but didn't actually READ them.

Re: Age Of Extinction's British Board Of Film Classification Confirms An Even Longer Running Time (1584990)
Posted by Rodimus Prime on June 23rd, 2014 @ 6:40am CDT

william-james88 wrote:http://www.mtv.com/news/1852304/transformers-age-of-extinction-early-reviews/

So the story is "weird" and "scattershot" but the images are "better than ever". Not sure what to make of that. I'm still seeing it, and I will probably love it, but that kinda raises a flag.

Also, the previous trilogy was also reviewed badly, and I ended up enjoying all 3 of them on 1st and 2nd viewings. So I don't put much stock into Bayhaters' reviews. I'm gonna go to the theater, get my big-ass bucket of popcorn and drink, and I will enjoy myself for 3 hours. I just have to remember to go to the can beforehand.

Re: Age Of Extinction's British Board Of Film Classification Confirms An Even Longer Running Time (1585009)
Posted by william-james88 on June 23rd, 2014 @ 8:09am CDT

Rodimus Prime wrote:
william-james88 wrote:http://www.mtv.com/news/1852304/transformers-age-of-extinction-early-reviews/

So the story is "weird" and "scattershot" but the images are "better than ever". Not sure what to make of that. I'm still seeing it, and I will probably love it, but that kinda raises a flag.

Dont worry about those lines, they raise no flags to me. Critics greatly disliked the last 2 films but people are actually enjoying the fun ride that is this one for once and that speaks volumes to me. What I get from these reviews is that, though the negatives can be pointed out, they do not take away from the enjoyment of the awesome visuals and action. And that is much much better than when the same critics would go : "Wheelie humping Megan Fox's leg and Devastator's balls really ruined the fun film for me".

So what I mean is if these critics actually had some fun this time, then there is no reason it should not be a blast to anyone who liked them before. And I like the fact that this has a heavy plot, I really look forward to it. Scattershot is not such a bad thing when its happening in the background of grandiose Transformer action and what it tells me is that there is a lot of planning to ensure more story material in upcoming films. I mean think about it, they are actually discussing plot regarding a Bayverse transformer film!

Simply said: a scattershot plot is better than no plot and IF you dont like the plot then the amazing transformer visuals in the foreground will help you ignore it. It's a win win.

Also, all these reviews confirm the early review that was posted a week ago. I guess that guy did see the film after all.

Re: Age Of Extinction's British Board Of Film Classification Confirms An Even Longer Running Time (1585030)
Posted by Va'al on June 23rd, 2014 @ 8:45am CDT

***NOTICE TO ALL USERS***

Please avoid discussing spoiler-filled content from or about the upcoming Transformers: Age of Extinction movie in this thread. These include reviews, preview screenings, personal viewings.

You are, however, welcome to do so over here.

Re: Age Of Extinction's British Board Of Film Classification Confirms An Even Longer Running Time (1585122)
Posted by Evil Eye on June 23rd, 2014 @ 2:28pm CDT

It actually looks like they're putting a heavier emphasis on the Transformers as characters for this one. Albeit only a little, but I like the looks of what they seem to be going with. The tone of the movie actually looks a bit more light-hearted- the Autobots are having a bit of fun and making snide remarks in a way very reminiscent of the old cartoon, and I think I like the look of this a lot more than the heavily grim tone of the 3rd film (where we see people vapourized on screen, and the Autobots don't exactly do a whole lot other than die horribly...RIP Ironhide...).

So yeah, I'm actually pretty pumped. I don't think it will be as good as the first movie (which in my opinion was the best) but it looks to be better than DOTM and a whole lot better than ROTF (which I actually liked, scrotums and all).

Re: Age Of Extinction's British Board Of Film Classification Confirms An Even Longer Running Time (1585133)
Posted by mooncake623 on June 23rd, 2014 @ 2:55pm CDT

Earlier last week we've reported that Transformers 5 was promised by Paramount Pictures Senior Vice President Edward Ryan in 2016 (here) at the TF4 Screening during CineEurope 2014 Barcelona. But NOT SO FAST reports ign.com. According to IGN's Roth Cornet who spoke with Transformers: Age of Extinction producer Lorenzo di Bonaventura the release date seems to be inaccurate. In fact the next movie might not even be part of a trilogy!

"We're not planning on doing a trilogy," he told Roth. "We're not not planning on doing a trilogy. It's really a one-movie-at-a-time philosophy. It feels a little arrogant. Both [director Michael Bay] and I feel like it's a little arrogant of us to presume success each time. We know our fans are really out there and they're going to come, so we presume a certain amount of success. But all the energy will be thrown into the next movie, if we're lucky enough to get there."

Re: Age Of Extinction's British Board Of Film Classification Confirms An Even Longer Running Time (1585156)
Posted by Megatron Wolf on June 23rd, 2014 @ 3:57pm CDT

unless the next one is a reboot its going to be a sequel or prequel theres no way around it. You could do a spin off but even that would be part of the established story line.

Re: Age Of Extinction's British Board Of Film Classification Confirms An Even Longer Running Time (1585161)
Posted by Rodimus Prime on June 23rd, 2014 @ 4:12pm CDT

I think they're going to do like they said the 1st time. They're just backtracking now to not look like overconfident blowhards. Saying that they were ready to make a trilogy made it sound like they were taking the success of this film for granted (and why shouldn't they?) and the next 2 are a foregone conclusion.

Re: Age Of Extinction's British Board Of Film Classification Confirms An Even Longer Running Time (1585168)
Posted by dragons on June 23rd, 2014 @ 4:37pm CDT

after reading this not so sure bay even knows what his plans for movie making in one articale after ddark of moon he said no more transformers movies for that be last one forever now hes doing this one he said if there was going to be another former movie he wants it done right and properly blah blah not some other director messing it up blah blah and thois one will be his final one he be working,.

will be he working on more transformer films in future :???:

Re: Age Of Extinction's British Board Of Film Classification Confirms An Even Longer Running Time (1585192)
Posted by Madeus Prime on June 23rd, 2014 @ 6:38pm CDT

Oh PUH-LEEEES, the movie's aren't going to end. They're a summer blockbuster that always makes money with the masses. No way they're going to stop making them. (I mean this all in a depressive sense, mainly because I really dislike the movies)

My hope is just that they'll get a new director for the next bunch of them.

Re: Age Of Extinction's British Board Of Film Classification Confirms An Even Longer Running Time (1585195)
Posted by It Is Him on June 23rd, 2014 @ 6:41pm CDT

WHY ARE THE HEADLINES SHOUTING?!

Re: Age Of Extinction's British Board Of Film Classification Confirms An Even Longer Running Time (1585204)
Posted by chivesbot20 on June 23rd, 2014 @ 7:11pm CDT

The whole reason i am a transformers fan is because of the films. The new film looks like the best based off of the trailers stills set videos, and even toys.And furthermore the movies all look great with bay directing them. Again my opinion.

Re: Age Of Extinction's British Board Of Film Classification Confirms An Even Longer Running Time (1585205)
Posted by chivesbot20 on June 23rd, 2014 @ 7:13pm CDT

I think michael bay has done a great job with the films He is the reason i am a superfan. It is my opinion, but the next film looks great

Re: Age Of Extinction's British Board Of Film Classification Confirms An Even Longer Running Time (1585213)
Posted by Deadput on June 23rd, 2014 @ 7:49pm CDT

20 new stills for Aoe

http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/KingPatel/news/?a=102420

Re: Age Of Extinction's British Board Of Film Classification Confirms An Even Longer Running Time (1585215)
Posted by ILL-Star on June 23rd, 2014 @ 7:52pm CDT

What's so surprising about them saying that AOE does not necessarily start another trilogy. This news doesn't suggest anything so different from how they handled the first three. They made small connections in order to link three different plots about Decepticon's trying to destroy the world. The connections were simple enough for them to not worry so much about tying things together. That's probably how they'll approach any sequel to Age Of Extinction.

Re: Age Of Extinction's British Board Of Film Classification Confirms An Even Longer Running Time (1585253)
Posted by RodimalToyota on June 23rd, 2014 @ 11:50pm CDT

Yeah that's horse poo considering how this movie ends. It's literally the first act.
And leaves it needing a next film to end the over all plot.

Re: Age Of Extinction's British Board Of Film Classification Confirms An Even Longer Running Time (1585331)
Posted by mooncake623 on June 24th, 2014 @ 9:03am CDT

Collider has recently posted an interview they had with Transformers:Age of Extinction actress Li Bingbing where they talked about what was it like to work with Michael Bay, the way Bay wanted her to look in the film,
What was it like doing the action sequences, Deleted scenes, and much more.

Re: Age Of Extinction's British Board Of Film Classification Confirms An Even Longer Running Time (1585336)
Posted by Doubledealer93 on June 24th, 2014 @ 9:25am CDT

That was irritating and painful to watch. And boring.

Re: Age Of Extinction's British Board Of Film Classification Confirms An Even Longer Running Time (1585337)
Posted by Deadput on June 24th, 2014 @ 9:26am CDT

new clip and 4 new spots

Spoilers beware it shows someones death

Re: Age Of Extinction's British Board Of Film Classification Confirms An Even Longer Running Time (1585349)
Posted by SlyTF1 on June 24th, 2014 @ 10:05am CDT

mirageandjazz1197 wrote:new clip and 4 new spots

Spoilers beware it shows someones death

Which one shows a death? The clip or one of the TV spots?

Re: Age Of Extinction's British Board Of Film Classification Confirms An Even Longer Running Time (1585357)
Posted by Rodimus Prime on June 24th, 2014 @ 10:38am CDT

SlyTF1 wrote:Which one shows a death? The clip or one of the TV spots?

The very end of the last TV spot showed Grimlock snapping someone in half with his jaws. Not sure who, it was just a mess of parts and green fluid. (Made me think it was Crosshairs for a second, but that wouldn't make sense.)

I wish Bee would keep that '69 Camaro alt mode. Looks so much better than the new one.

Re: Age Of Extinction's British Board Of Film Classification Confirms An Even Longer Running Time (1585370)
Posted by Cyberpath on June 24th, 2014 @ 11:04am CDT

Off to see AOE! Hope it's good, or at least better than the first three. :)

Re: Age Of Extinction's British Board Of Film Classification Confirms An Even Longer Running Time (1585377)
Posted by Peridot on June 24th, 2014 @ 11:23am CDT

Rodimus Prime wrote:
SlyTF1 wrote:Which one shows a death? The clip or one of the TV spots?

The very end of the last TV spot showed Grimlock snapping someone in half with his jaws. Not sure who, it was just a mess of parts and green fluid. (Made me think it was Crosshairs for a second, but that wouldn't make sense.)

I wish Bee would keep that '69 Camaro alt mode. Looks so much better than the new one.

I'm pretty sure that's just a Vehicon.

Re: Age Of Extinction's British Board Of Film Classification Confirms An Even Longer Running Time (1585388)
Posted by Deadput on June 24th, 2014 @ 12:01pm CDT

NO SPOILERS

And i know this because i went to an early screening.

I also know about a bunch of other deaths as well.

EDITED BY Va'al

Re: Age Of Extinction's British Board Of Film Classification Confirms An Even Longer Running Time (1585391)
Posted by Sabrblade on June 24th, 2014 @ 12:07pm CDT

Metro Prime wrote:
Rodimus Prime wrote:
SlyTF1 wrote:Which one shows a death? The clip or one of the TV spots?

The very end of the last TV spot showed Grimlock snapping someone in half with his jaws. Not sure who, it was just a mess of parts and green fluid. (Made me think it was Crosshairs for a second, but that wouldn't make sense.)

I wish Bee would keep that '69 Camaro alt mode. Looks so much better than the new one.

I'm pretty sure that's just a Vehicon.

The Chevy Trax bots aren't Vehicons.

This is an AOE Vehicon:

Re: Age Of Extinction's British Board Of Film Classification Confirms An Even Longer Running Time (1585392)
Posted by Sabrblade on June 24th, 2014 @ 12:08pm CDT

double post

Click here to view additional comments about this topic at the Energon Pub Forums ...