Seibertron.com Energon Pub Forums

Gutsman Heavy wrote:Xion, its FMV, mot real time. I wish it was but it ain't

Damn too bad, but it still looks good.

Salazaar wrote:

The Master Blaster wrote:If you don't wanna hear bitchin, then let it be.


Megatron does look like crap. ILM and the makers of this game are miracle workers.

Give me a G1 transformer, or even an Armada transformer over that pile of turd.




And really, Geewunner?

That "insult", if you can call it that, is not only incredibly lame, it actually sounds, for want of a better phrasing, gay.

Understand that last bit is not meant to offend anyone, but it's how me friend would say it, and I spent all day with him today, so his poison kinda seeped in

Are you blind? I said it wasn't meant to insult anyone. It's a group of people, dumbass.

Enough with the insults.

Well, that video pretty much sold me on the game. Definitely going to get it now. But, since it's not co-op I don't see the point it wasting $60 for it on 360. It'll be the PC version for me.

I also think it would be cool if a Transformers game like Marvel: Ultimate Alliance was made. Hope it happens.

Spoon wrote:

Salazaar wrote:

Spoon wrote:

Salazaar wrote:Megatron looks pretty good in movement. Take that, geewunners!

It still looks like a pile of moving donkey poo. I don't see why you 'consider this a victory'. Seriously, stop all the 'geewunner' wannabe insult crap.

It wasn't an insult. And if you can't get over that the movie designs are complex, you might as well just quit posting, cause nobody wants to hear your bitching.

Complex does not equal good. Too bad you have yet to realise that.
Some people are just so easily pleased with piss poor designs.

While you see the new designs being piss poor, others may see the old designs as being pretty piss poor in comparison to these new ones. Its all in the eye of the beholder.

Bilko90 wrote:

gogleman374 wrote:Well Now you know the game wont have as good graphics due to the intro looking so nice! They spend there time working on the quality of the intro and dont give a Rats ass about the in game graphics! But I do agree with spoon Megatron still loks like donkey poo.

im pretty sure its a different developer doing the cutscenes and FMV sequences. so the in-game graphics should be just fine. not wasting time. the only thing i do hope is that there isnt a terrible framerate and slowdown for ps3 like in Spiderman 3 the game. other than that. im really happy with the way its shaping up. anything on downloadable content for ps3?

You are indeed correct. The guys doing the FMV have nothing to do with the actual game play side of things, and as far as i can tell the in-game graphics are looking pretty sweet too. Well, at least the 360 version is.

i thought so. is there any word at all on downloadable content, for either ps3 or 360? the ps3 in-game graphics at the moment, look either exactly the same, or a very very little bit worse. (extremely small bit). which i can understand because as of the moment, developers are still favouring 360. but im hoping thats not the case. they will be alot better soon im guessing. (not starting a console war arguement,if thats what it looks like)

I really wish that the website would state what requirements your PC has to have to be able to run this program. Has anyone seen these?

Bilko90 wrote:i thought so. is there any word at all on downloadable content, for either ps3 or 360? the ps3 in-game graphics at the moment, look either exactly the same, or a very very little bit worse. (extremely small bit). which i can understand because as of the moment, developers are still favouring 360. but im hoping thats not the case. they will be alot better soon im guessing. (not starting a console war arguement,if thats what it looks like)

Multiplatform games usually look better on high end pc's, but as for the consoles the 360 usually wins on that one since it does actually have better hardware than the PS3. The PS3 lacks power in vital areas, and its alot more complicated to develop for hence why it usually has the inferior graphics because the developers get lazy, or simply cant figure out how to push the hardware. Sony messed up big time there.

I dont think we will see much difference when it comes to graphics between the two systems any more though. They are both (relatively) comparable systems and it wont be the massive difference we used to see when comparing xbox games to ps2 games that we saw in the past.

The only difference we will see is maybe slightly better load times for the PS3, better frame rates for the 360, better lighting and exposure for the 360(because all PS3 games seem to look washed out and bleached), slightly sharper textures for the PS3 and better particle effects for the 360.

Not really anything huge or drastic like last gen. The main differences and advantages and disadvantages now take the form of price tags and online capabilities and you havnt got to be an expert in games to know which of the two systems has the upper hand in that department.

I wont even give the Wii a mention as thats not even a "next-gen/current-gen" system.

Robinson wrote:

Spoon wrote:

Salazaar wrote:

Spoon wrote:

Salazaar wrote:Megatron looks pretty good in movement. Take that, geewunners!

It still looks like a pile of moving donkey poo. I don't see why you 'consider this a victory'. Seriously, stop all the 'geewunner' wannabe insult crap.

It wasn't an insult. And if you can't get over that the movie designs are complex, you might as well just quit posting, cause nobody wants to hear your bitching.

Complex does not equal good. Too bad you have yet to realise that.
Some people are just so easily pleased with piss poor designs.

While you see the new designs being piss poor, others may see the old designs as being pretty piss poor in comparison to these new ones. Its all in the eye of the beholder.

QFT.

Sonray wrote:

Bilko90 wrote:i thought so. is there any word at all on downloadable content, for either ps3 or 360? the ps3 in-game graphics at the moment, look either exactly the same, or a very very little bit worse. (extremely small bit). which i can understand because as of the moment, developers are still favouring 360. but im hoping thats not the case. they will be alot better soon im guessing. (not starting a console war arguement,if thats what it looks like)

Multiplatform games usually look better on high end pc's, but as for the consoles the 360 usually wins on that one since it does actually have better hardware than the PS3. The PS3 lacks power in vital areas, and its alot more complicated to develop for hence why it usually has the inferior graphics because the developers get lazy, or simply cant figure out how to push the hardware. Sony messed up big time there.

I dont think we will see much difference when it comes to graphics between the two systems any more though. They are both (relatively) comparable systems and it wont be the massive difference we used to see when comparing xbox games to ps2 games that we saw in the past.

The only difference we will see is maybe slightly better load times for the PS3, better frame rates for the 360, better lighting and exposure for the 360(because all PS3 games seem to look washed out and bleached), slightly sharper textures for the PS3 and better particle effects for the 360.

Not really anything huge or drastic like last gen. The main differences and advantages and disadvantages now take the form of price tags and online capabilities and you havnt got to be an expert in games to know which of the two systems has the upper hand in that department.

I wont even give the Wii a mention as thats not even a "next-gen/current-gen" system.

to true. its an innovative system. but in terms of graphics and power. it does slightly lack.

i would've said that the ps3 actually had some better hardware and some worse, with the cell processor and all. if you look on gamespots graphics comparison, that the ps3 has vastly improved. in their first comparison, 360 was the clear winner on most games, but in this recent one, not long after the first, its almost identicle, with ps3 even taking a few wins. plus sony said its using only 20% of power atm. gamespot says its gonna improve again by the fall. so heres hoping

Spoon wrote:

Salazaar wrote:

Spoon wrote:

Salazaar wrote:Megatron looks pretty good in movement. Take that, geewunners!

It still looks like a pile of moving donkey poo. I don't see why you 'consider this a victory'. Seriously, stop all the 'geewunner' wannabe insult crap.

It wasn't an insult. And if you can't get over that the movie designs are complex, you might as well just quit posting, cause nobody wants to hear your bitching.

Complex does not equal good. Too bad you have yet to realise that.
Some people are just so easily pleased with piss poor designs.

yeah, it's amazing to me how easily pleased some people here are. i'll never call that junk pile megatron and i'll never get over how the people behind the movie screwed the g1 fans over. all the bots suck ass but "megs" and fuglyscream definately take the cake.

kimmer wrote:

Spoon wrote:

Salazaar wrote:

Spoon wrote:

Salazaar wrote:Megatron looks pretty good in movement. Take that, geewunners!

It still looks like a pile of moving donkey poo. I don't see why you 'consider this a victory'. Seriously, stop all the 'geewunner' wannabe insult crap.

It wasn't an insult. And if you can't get over that the movie designs are complex, you might as well just quit posting, cause nobody wants to hear your bitching.

Complex does not equal good. Too bad you have yet to realise that.
Some people are just so easily pleased with piss poor designs.

yeah, it's amazing to me how easily pleased some people here are. i'll never call that junk pile megatron and i'll never get over how the people behind the movie screwed the g1 fans over. all the bots suck ass but "megs" and fuglyscream definately take the cake.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A6i1ywioIm0

kimmer wrote:

Spoon wrote:

Salazaar wrote:

Spoon wrote:

Salazaar wrote:Megatron looks pretty good in movement. Take that, geewunners!

It still looks like a pile of moving donkey poo. I don't see why you 'consider this a victory'. Seriously, stop all the 'geewunner' wannabe insult crap.

It wasn't an insult. And if you can't get over that the movie designs are complex, you might as well just quit posting, cause nobody wants to hear your bitching.

Complex does not equal good. Too bad you have yet to realise that.
Some people are just so easily pleased with piss poor designs.

yeah, it's amazing to me how easily pleased some people here are. i'll never call that junk pile megatron and i'll never get over how the people behind the movie screwed the g1 fans over. all the bots suck ass but "megs" and fuglyscream definately take the cake.

And its amazing how stubborn some fans are being and not accepting the fact that its not G1. People can accept megs with a head that looks a Stag Beetle, or the power ranger optimus with his "megazords". But the minute they reinvision characters for another interpretation people get pissy and complain to no end.

great intro like the ending more where peter cullen says one shall shall stand shall fall

Robinson wrote:

kimmer wrote:

Spoon wrote:

Salazaar wrote:

Spoon wrote:

Salazaar wrote:Megatron looks pretty good in movement. Take that, geewunners!

It still looks like a pile of moving donkey poo. I don't see why you 'consider this a victory'. Seriously, stop all the 'geewunner' wannabe insult crap.

It wasn't an insult. And if you can't get over that the movie designs are complex, you might as well just quit posting, cause nobody wants to hear your bitching.

Complex does not equal good. Too bad you have yet to realise that.
Some people are just so easily pleased with piss poor designs.

yeah, it's amazing to me how easily pleased some people here are. i'll never call that junk pile megatron and i'll never get over how the people behind the movie screwed the g1 fans over. all the bots suck ass but "megs" and fuglyscream definately take the cake.

And its amazing how stubborn some fans are being and not accepting the fact that its not G1. People can accept megs with a head that looks a Stag Beetle, or the power ranger optimus with his "megazords". But the minute they reinvision characters for another interpretation people get pissy and complain to no end.

S.O.R.D.D. Same old rant different day!!!!


I am definitely going to get that gmae, on 360.. its graphics are way better then all other systems.. wii has its good points, but 360 has the graphics engine i need for hi Definition and quality.. if i wanted the things that the Wii has, I wouldn't have bought my Laptop, Acer, DVDRW, dual processor, with the ultra graphics card for high speed gaming online...I actually bought this with those features for work. I had it built when i opened this company of mine...

Bilko90 wrote:

Sonray wrote:

Bilko90 wrote:i thought so. is there any word at all on downloadable content, for either ps3 or 360? the ps3 in-game graphics at the moment, look either exactly the same, or a very very little bit worse. (extremely small bit). which i can understand because as of the moment, developers are still favouring 360. but im hoping thats not the case. they will be alot better soon im guessing. (not starting a console war arguement,if thats what it looks like)

Multiplatform games usually look better on high end pc's, but as for the consoles the 360 usually wins on that one since it does actually have better hardware than the PS3. The PS3 lacks power in vital areas, and its alot more complicated to develop for hence why it usually has the inferior graphics because the developers get lazy, or simply cant figure out how to push the hardware. Sony messed up big time there.

I dont think we will see much difference when it comes to graphics between the two systems any more though. They are both (relatively) comparable systems and it wont be the massive difference we used to see when comparing xbox games to ps2 games that we saw in the past.

The only difference we will see is maybe slightly better load times for the PS3, better frame rates for the 360, better lighting and exposure for the 360(because all PS3 games seem to look washed out and bleached), slightly sharper textures for the PS3 and better particle effects for the 360.

Not really anything huge or drastic like last gen. The main differences and advantages and disadvantages now take the form of price tags and online capabilities and you havnt got to be an expert in games to know which of the two systems has the upper hand in that department.

I wont even give the Wii a mention as thats not even a "next-gen/current-gen" system.

to true. its an innovative system. but in terms of graphics and power. it does slightly lack.

i would've said that the ps3 actually had some better hardware and some worse, with the cell processor and all. if you look on gamespots graphics comparison, that the ps3 has vastly improved. in their first comparison, 360 was the clear winner on most games, but in this recent one, not long after the first, its almost identicle, with ps3 even taking a few wins. plus sony said its using only 20% of power atm. gamespot says its gonna improve again by the fall. so heres hoping

I wouldnt give Nintendo any credit for being "innovative" since all they do is use old gimmicks and release sequel after sequel of mario games...

I wouldnt take anything that GS says seriously, they are idiots. Plus of course Sony is going to claim the ps3 is only using 20% of its power, they are full of lies and want their system to sound good. Every company is going to try and make their crap sound good, its called business.

Fact is developers are having alot of trouble even getting close to realizing the systems full potential because it just doesnt have power where it counts to fully take advantage of the cell processor. Check out IGN and their technical comparison charts for the PS3 and 360, you will be surprised just how lacking the PS3 is in most areas.

As for GS's graphics comparison, i think i saw the 360 take more wins than the PS3 did, but for the most part they were identical.

Truth is niether system has come close to realizing its full potential yet but when you look at the technical sheets for the PS3 and how hard of a time developers are having with the hardware things dont look good for it. Especially when you take into account the stupid price tag and useless online compenent and the overkill expensive gimmick that is blue ray.

I expect the TF game on the PS3 to have some major frame rate issues like its version of F.E.A.R. did, and Spiderman 3.

I am only getting the PSP version as thats the only system I have that they currently still make things for.

I know thats the same ole rant, but then you have people like kimmer that keep saying the same ole' "complaints"

Salazaar wrote:

kimmer wrote:

Spoon wrote:

Salazaar wrote:

Spoon wrote:

Salazaar wrote:Megatron looks pretty good in movement. Take that, geewunners!

It still looks like a pile of moving donkey poo. I don't see why you 'consider this a victory'. Seriously, stop all the 'geewunner' wannabe insult crap.

It wasn't an insult. And if you can't get over that the movie designs are complex, you might as well just quit posting, cause nobody wants to hear your bitching.

Complex does not equal good. Too bad you have yet to realise that.
Some people are just so easily pleased with piss poor designs.

yeah, it's amazing to me how easily pleased some people here are. i'll never call that junk pile megatron and i'll never get over how the people behind the movie screwed the g1 fans over. all the bots suck ass but "megs" and fuglyscream definately take the cake.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A6i1ywioIm0

Its amazing to me how lame this arguement continues to be.

Robinson wrote:I am only getting the PSP version as thats the only system I have that they currently still make things for.

I know thats the same ole rant, but then you have people like kimmer that keep saying the same ole' "complaints"

Plus the PSP version will have G1 content last i heard? You will miss out on the big, wide open and sprawling and detailed enviroments though.

Sonray wrote:

Salazaar wrote:

kimmer wrote:

Spoon wrote:

Salazaar wrote:

Spoon wrote:

Salazaar wrote:Megatron looks pretty good in movement. Take that, geewunners!

It still looks like a pile of moving donkey poo. I don't see why you 'consider this a victory'. Seriously, stop all the 'geewunner' wannabe insult crap.

It wasn't an insult. And if you can't get over that the movie designs are complex, you might as well just quit posting, cause nobody wants to hear your bitching.

Complex does not equal good. Too bad you have yet to realise that.
Some people are just so easily pleased with piss poor designs.

yeah, it's amazing to me how easily pleased some people here are. i'll never call that junk pile megatron and i'll never get over how the people behind the movie screwed the g1 fans over. all the bots suck ass but "megs" and fuglyscream definately take the cake.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A6i1ywioIm0

Its amazing to me how lame this arguement continues to be.

I just find it sad that some people just can't accept change.

Hey, keep it on topic people.

This argument about the designs has been going on for a long time now, this thread is about the intro to the movie game, nothing else.

Is that Ironhide throwing the wrecking ball into Brawl, or is that Prime? I can't really tell.

Sonray wrote:

Robinson wrote:I am only getting the PSP version as thats the only system I have that they currently still make things for.

I know thats the same ole rant, but then you have people like kimmer that keep saying the same ole' "complaints"

Plus the PSP version will have G1 content last i heard? You will miss out on the big, wide open and sprawling and detailed enviroments though.

Last I heard psp version still has the open evironment and the ability to destoy mass amounts of stuff, its just the graphics will suffer only slightly. Plus the G1 content is cool because its like a true exclusve to the PSP. I may eventually get a WII, the wife is warming up to the idea somewhat, but not enough to warrant getting it, If I ever do, thenI'll get the game for that system. Or if the ps3 goes down to 150 dollars then I might get that.

Salazaar wrote:

Spoon wrote:

Salazaar wrote:Megatron looks pretty good in movement. Take that, geewunners!

It still looks like a pile of moving donkey poo. I don't see why you 'consider this a victory'. Seriously, stop all the 'geewunner' wannabe insult crap.

It wasn't an insult. And if you can't get over that the movie designs are complex, you might as well just quit posting, cause nobody wants to hear your bitching.

don't be an ass.

Godzilla wrote:Too bad Tracks didn't make it in the movie!

You would have thought the way GM has a huge stake in most of the cars in the film they would have forced a Vette into the film, and, naturally, it would be blue, and named...Tracks.

I feel your pain. Tracks needs more love.