D-Maximus_Prime wrote:Now if only I could still fit into a couple of those
WreckerJack wrote:D-Maximus_Prime wrote:Now if only I could still fit into a couple of those
One would assume they will have adult size tees soon.
Leonardo wrote:Take your lips off my pipe!
JelZe GoldRabbit wrote:So relatively speaking:
1:24 is Alternator/Binaltech size
1:32 is Alternity/GT size
1:64 is Hot Wheels size?
hausjam wrote:Maybe it's because I have always been a car enthusiast, but I am really not a fan of the ricer look of the cars from the last few movies.
hausjam wrote:Maybe it's because I have always been a car enthusiast, but I am really not a fan of the ricer look of the cars from the last few movies.
Shadowman wrote:This is Sabrblade we're talking about. His ability to store trivial information about TV shows is downright superhuman.
Caelus wrote:My wife pointed out something interesting about the prehistoric Predacons. I said that everyone was complaining because transforming for them mostly consisted of them just standing up-right. She essentially said, 'So? That's what our ancestors did.'
william-james88 wrote:hausjam wrote:Maybe it's because I have always been a car enthusiast, but I am really not a fan of the ricer look of the cars from the last few movies.
What does a ricer look mean?
Bronzewolf wrote:william-james88 wrote:hausjam wrote:Maybe it's because I have always been a car enthusiast, but I am really not a fan of the ricer look of the cars from the last few movies.
What does a ricer look mean?
A "Ricer" is an owner of an overly-modified cheap (normally an import) car. Think "Seventeen year old who wants to turn their beater into a Fast and Furious car". Lots of unnecessary wings, body kits and undercarriage lighting. Now this is not to say that all cars with wings/body kits/undercarriage lighting etc. are Ricers; Obviously when those mods are applied to a car that's of quality/actually meant to go fast, when the mods are applied correctly and fit the car (as most ricer mods are DIY jobs that look awful), and when they serve a genuine purpose other than to look cool, it's justified. From this "up for interpretation" definition comes our current debate. I can see where 'jam is coming from, but I just don't see (mainly Crosshairs and Bee) as looking Riced.
Don't talk to me about cars, man. I'll end up writing essays.
Return to Transformers Toys Discussion
Registered users: Bing [Bot], Bumblevivisector, Dino-Snarl, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot], Roadbuster, SupersonicShockwave