Seibertron.com Energon Pub Forums

Sabrblade wrote:How come Seibertron.com didn't partake in the Hall of Fame's first round of voting this year?

I thought Ryan had explained. I'll leave it to him to do so, if he wishes.

(But yeah, pretty much what you said in the next message.)

Va'al wrote:
(But yeah, pretty much what you said in the next message.)

It was my personal sentiment too though I cannot speak for everyone.

Va'al wrote:

Sabrblade wrote:How come Seibertron.com didn't partake in the Hall of Fame's first round of voting this year?

I thought Ryan had explained. I'll leave it to him to do so, if he wishes.

(But yeah, pretty much what you said in the next message.)

Seibertron.com didn't participate because it's too much work in too little time for too little reward. I informed Hasbro of my decision. During my emails with them, I let them know that I'd be happy to help come up with some other ideas, but to say "hey we need you to drop everything today and have the results to us within one week" is too much. If they would work with the site owners and give us some sort of heads up so that we can get things together in advance, it would be different. It was great the first two years, but after that it was too much work to have it be something barely mentioned at the end of the Hasbro brand panel.

The email from Hasbro was on April 13th. I was in the middle of finalizing Seibertron.com's taxes for the year, which are not a lot of fun. It was poor timing on behalf of Hasbro to spring something on us last minute. No one on the Seibertron staff volunteered to manually tally results either (which is the biggest obstacle that I don't want to do any more).

Seibertron wrote:The email from Hasbro was on April 13th. I was in the middle of finalizing Seibertron.com's taxes for the year, which are not a lot of fun. It was poor timing on behalf of Hasbro to spring something on us last minute. No one on the Seibertron staff volunteered to manually tally results either (which is the biggest obstacle that I don't want to do any more).

Yep, not a good time for many of us. It just would not work in the way Hasbro wanted us to do it.

Messing up images and names, asking fansites to do a lot during tax season, not even giving the Hall of Fame the attention it deserves... man, it really doesn't look good for Hasbro.

Noideaforaname wrote:Messing up images and names, asking fansites to do a lot during tax season, not even giving the Hall of Fame the attention it deserves... man, it really doesn't look good for Hasbro.

The way I see it, you either do it right or you don't do it at all. By showing so much carelessness, this hall of fame doesnt feel more official than a website poll. Only my opinion. To be dead honest, I feel Takara's Masterpiece output is the true hall of fame, with all the fanfare and attention it deserves.

Va'al wrote:

Seibertron wrote:The email from Hasbro was on April 13th. I was in the middle of finalizing Seibertron.com's taxes for the year, which are not a lot of fun. It was poor timing on behalf of Hasbro to spring something on us last minute. No one on the Seibertron staff volunteered to manually tally results either (which is the biggest obstacle that I don't want to do any more).

Yep, not a good time for many of us. It just would not work in the way Hasbro wanted us to do it.

I feel bad that we didn't do it ... but it just wasn't in the cards that week at the last minute and with it not being a big deal any more.

If it hadn't devolved into two powerpoint slides at the end of a presentation in the middle of the afternoon it'd still be a cool thing. I think that's been said by plenty, just wanted to give my two cents on it even though they aren't super compelling

Not only did they mix up their Predakings, but if you look at the picture they're using for Optimus Primal, you'll see that while it's the BW 10th anniversary design, it's in the colors released in the Cybertron line as another body for Optimus Prime.

YoungPrime wrote:I am officially boycotting this poll in light of them trolling the REAL Predaking!

That BH crap has no place beyond the Hall of Shame!

I'm sorry you feel like the boring G1 hack work you are so fond of has been slighted by a character from it being mistaken for his counterpart from an actually-watchable show. Perhaps you'd be happier in the He-man fandom, where new ideas are less likely to trouble you.

Nemesis Primal wrote:

YoungPrime wrote:I am officially boycotting this poll in light of them trolling the REAL Predaking!

That BH crap has no place beyond the Hall of Shame!

I'm sorry you feel like the boring G1 hack work you are so fond of has been slighted by a character from it being mistaken for his counterpart from an actually-watchable show. Perhaps you'd be happier in the He-man fandom, where new ideas are less likely to trouble you.

Zing!


I voted Primal, Vince, and Predaking.
... how is Primal "not a character"? He went from rookie leader to spiritual zealot... way more depth than anything in G1 He's also unrelated to Prime, and BW Megatron was inducted 2 years ago. Bye Felicia

Nemesis Primal wrote:Not only did they mix up their Predakings, but if you look at the picture they're using for Optimus Primal, you'll see that while it's the BW 10th anniversary design, it's in the colors released in the Cybertron line as another body for Optimus Prime.

YoungPrime wrote:I am officially boycotting this poll in light of them trolling the REAL Predaking!

That BH crap has no place beyond the Hall of Shame!

I'm sorry you feel like the boring G1 hack work you are so fond of has been slighted by a character from it being mistaken for his counterpart from an actually-watchable show. Perhaps you'd be happier in the He-man fandom, where new ideas are less likely to trouble you.

It's the wrong Predaking. It'd be like showing a picture of Beast Wars Inferno for G1 Inferno or ROTF Rampage for Beast Wars Rampage or Predacon Rampage. If it's supposed to be for best Combiner, it should show G1 Predaking instead of Beast Hunters Predaking (who is not a Combiner). No need to talk smack about G1 here or turn this conversation into something that it's not.

Seibertron wrote:

Nemesis Primal wrote:Not only did they mix up their Predakings, but if you look at the picture they're using for Optimus Primal, you'll see that while it's the BW 10th anniversary design, it's in the colors released in the Cybertron line as another body for Optimus Prime.

YoungPrime wrote:I am officially boycotting this poll in light of them trolling the REAL Predaking!

That BH crap has no place beyond the Hall of Shame!

I'm sorry you feel like the boring G1 hack work you are so fond of has been slighted by a character from it being mistaken for his counterpart from an actually-watchable show. Perhaps you'd be happier in the He-man fandom, where new ideas are less likely to trouble you.

It's the wrong Predaking. It'd be like showing a picture of Beast Wars Inferno for G1 Inferno or ROTF Rampage for Beast Wars Rampage or Predacon Rampage. If it's supposed to be for best Combiner, it should show G1 Predaking instead of Beast Hunters Predaking (who is not a Combiner). No need to talk smack about G1 here or turn this conversation into something that it's not.

I am not denying that they got their Predakings mixed up (and in fact I'd like to point out again that they goofed on their Optimuses, too), I am just saying that G1 Predaking is not the "real" Predaking any more than BH Predaking is. And with all due respect, why are his insults okay, but my firing back is suddenly crossing a line?

And back on topic, is it just me or are there way fewer choices this year than usual? Granted, there's three things to vote on instead of just one like it's been in the past, but still, cutting it down to three options apiece seems drastic to say the least.

Primal and Predaking aren't the only oddities here. Galvatron's pic is of Energon Galvatron, and Bruticus's pic is of FOC Bruticus.

While not as odd as the other two, I'm sure most were thinking more of the G1 guys.

Sabrblade wrote:Primal and Predaking aren't the only oddities here. Galvatron's pic is of Energon Galvatron, and Bruticus's pic is of FOC Bruticus.

While not as odd as the other two, I'm sure most were thinking more of the G1 guys.

I think that may be one of those things where Hasbro considers them different versions of the same character. Just count your blessings Galvatron didn't wind up using the pic for Galvatronus!

I'm sure Hasbro just wanted to diversify their pictures... I don't really see them as "wrong"

They also royally **** up Primal's bio too, implying Maximals and Predacons were before the Autobots and Decepticons instead of traveling back in time.

MartianSpyGirl1996 wrote:They also royally **** up Primal's bio too, implying Maximals and Predacons were before the Autobots and Decepticons instead of traveling back in time.

To be fair, they just recycled that bio from last year's Hall of Fame bio for him.

Prowl's bio is likewise recycled from the Hasbro.com product description for the Prime Beast Hunters Legion class Prowl bio.

Sabrblade wrote:

MartianSpyGirl1996 wrote:They also royally **** up Primal's bio too, implying Maximals and Predacons were before the Autobots and Decepticons instead of traveling back in time.

To be fair, they just recycled that bio from last year's Hall of Fame bio for him.

Prowl's bio is likewise recycled from the Hasbro.com product description for the Prime Beast Hunters Legion class Prowl bio.

Man, I didn't even realized they did this last year until a few hours ago. I was stabbed through the heart that Blackarachnia lost... just utterly stabbed

Nemesis Primal wrote:I am not denying that they got their Predakings mixed up (and in fact I'd like to point out again that they goofed on their Optimuses, too), I am just saying that G1 Predaking is not the "real" Predaking any more than BH Predaking is. And with all due respect, why are his insults okay, but my firing back is suddenly crossing a line?

You still don't seem to get it. Predaking is in the "best combiner" category, so the picture should be of a Predaking that combines. That's it. There is no "real" or "not real". It's the simple idea that the picture of Predaking in the best combiner category should be of the combining Predaking That is how this picture is wrong. No need for a debate.

MartianSpyGirl1996 wrote:I'm sure Hasbro just wanted to diversify their pictures... I don't really see them as "wrong"

It's wrong, see above.

william-james88 wrote:You still don't seem to get it. Predaking is in the "best combiner" category, so the picture should be of a Predaking that combines. That's it. There is no "real" or "not real". It's the simple idea that the picture of Predaking in the best combiner category should be of the combining Predaking That is how this picture is wrong. No need for a debate.

MartianSpyGirl1996 wrote:I'm sure Hasbro just wanted to diversify their pictures... I don't really see them as "wrong"

It's wrong, see above.

You take this brand too seriously. It would have been wrong if they used Menasor in his place... it's still Predaking, reguardless of whether or not he combines. With them choosing G1 Prowl instead of RiD15 Prowl, I think they simply wanted to break things up. It's not that big a deal, all all.

MartianSpyGirl1996 wrote:

william-james88 wrote:You still don't seem to get it. Predaking is in the "best combiner" category, so the picture should be of a Predaking that combines. That's it. There is no "real" or "not real". It's the simple idea that the picture of Predaking in the best combiner category should be of the combining Predaking That is how this picture is wrong. No need for a debate.

MartianSpyGirl1996 wrote:I'm sure Hasbro just wanted to diversify their pictures... I don't really see them as "wrong"

It's wrong, see above.

You take this brand too seriously. It would have been wrong if they used Menasor in his place... it's still Predaking, reguardless of whether or not he combines. With them choosing G1 Prowl instead of RiD15 Prowl, I think they simply wanted to break things up. It's not that big a deal, all all.

Could have been worse (Note: Not my pic):

Sabrblade wrote:Could have been worse (Note: Not my pic):

LOL! Definitely looking at the bright side there Sabrblade

Seibertron wrote:

Sabrblade wrote:Could have been worse (Note: Not my pic):

LOL! Definitely looking at the bright side there Sabrblade

Not gonna lie. Ithose had been the real options, I'd have voted for that RiD 2001 Bruticus in a heartbeat!

That is, if I could vote (stupid app-only voting)!

Sabrblade wrote:Could have been worse (Note: Not my pic):

Pahahahahahaha.