mcfmullen wrote:1) Your post came AFTER.
Please, if you're going to lie, at least make a lie that can't be proven wrong by scrolling up.
mcfmullen wrote:4) The game isn't released yet, which means any statements about anything beyond aesthetic are invalid. You cannot claim something is good without having tried it. However, as you said, something can LOOK good or bad by observing it. That doesn't make it true or justified.
5) Only by trying a game can an opinion be justified.
Do you plan on pointing this out to everyone who says the game looks good? Because if you're going for the whole "You haven't played it, your argument is invalid" bullshit, you have to apply it to every side to avoid being a hypocrite.
mcfmullen wrote:8) "Because the game doesn't look "fun as hell" to everyone. To me it looks like a really shallow brawler that's relying more on nostalgia than anything else."
- "Fun as hell" is not a criteria for a good game. Simple fun suffices.
Oh my God, learn to read. I'm not even going to refute this one, just read the post. I know that might be tough for you, but try.
mcfmullen wrote:So drop it.
Why do you keep saying that? You have no ability to actually make me stop.