Shadowman wrote:This is Sabrblade we're talking about. His ability to store trivial information about TV shows is downright superhuman.
Caelus wrote:My wife pointed out something interesting about the prehistoric Predacons. I said that everyone was complaining because transforming for them mostly consisted of them just standing up-right. She essentially said, 'So? That's what our ancestors did.'
Sabrblade wrote:We don't need a bigger Tankor toy. What we need are smaller Maximal toys.
Cobotron wrote:Hey! You seemed to have attracted a wild Megatronus. They're hard to find, but boy are they fun when you catch one!
Unless G1 Bumblebee was the size of Tankor in the continuity of the BM cartoon.megatronus wrote:Sabrblade wrote:We don't need a bigger Tankor toy. What we need are smaller Maximal toys.
I like your spin!
You can argue that because he's the size of Classics Bee, the toy should be about double the height to be in scale with that picture.
Shadowman wrote:This is Sabrblade we're talking about. His ability to store trivial information about TV shows is downright superhuman.
Caelus wrote:My wife pointed out something interesting about the prehistoric Predacons. I said that everyone was complaining because transforming for them mostly consisted of them just standing up-right. She essentially said, 'So? That's what our ancestors did.'
Sabrblade wrote:Unless G1 Bumblebee was the size of Tankor in the continuity of the BM cartoon.megatronus wrote:Sabrblade wrote:We don't need a bigger Tankor toy. What we need are smaller Maximal toys.
I like your spin!
You can argue that because he's the size of Classics Bee, the toy should be about double the height to be in scale with that picture.
It's kinda like how Titanium Optimal Optimus is scaled decently to other Autobot and Decepticon toys, as he only towered over other Maximals and Predacons.
Hence my use of "the continuity of the BM cartoon" over other continuities we actually saw G1 Bee in.Doctor McGrath wrote:Clever reasoning for sure & as someone who cares about scale a little, I appreciate it. But, based on Spike's size compared to Bee's in the G1 cartoon, I still think Tankor should be bigger than classics Bee.
Shadowman wrote:This is Sabrblade we're talking about. His ability to store trivial information about TV shows is downright superhuman.
Caelus wrote:My wife pointed out something interesting about the prehistoric Predacons. I said that everyone was complaining because transforming for them mostly consisted of them just standing up-right. She essentially said, 'So? That's what our ancestors did.'
Sabrblade wrote:Hence my use of "the continuity of the BM cartoon" over other continuities we actually saw G1 Bee in.Doctor McGrath wrote:Clever reasoning for sure & as someone who cares about scale a little, I appreciate it. But, based on Spike's size compared to Bee's in the G1 cartoon, I still think Tankor should be bigger than classics Bee.
Doctor McGrath wrote:Sabrblade wrote:Unless G1 Bumblebee was the size of Tankor in the continuity of the BM cartoon.megatronus wrote:Sabrblade wrote:We don't need a bigger Tankor toy. What we need are smaller Maximal toys.
I like your spin!
You can argue that because he's the size of Classics Bee, the toy should be about double the height to be in scale with that picture.
It's kinda like how Titanium Optimal Optimus is scaled decently to other Autobot and Decepticon toys, as he only towered over other Maximals and Predacons.
Clever reasoning for sure & as someone who cares about scale a little, I appreciate it. But, based on Spike's size compared to Bee's in the G1 cartoon, I still think Tankor should be bigger than classics Bee.
craggy wrote:Doctor McGrath wrote:Sabrblade wrote:Unless G1 Bumblebee was the size of Tankor in the continuity of the BM cartoon.megatronus wrote:Sabrblade wrote:We don't need a bigger Tankor toy. What we need are smaller Maximal toys.
I like your spin!
You can argue that because he's the size of Classics Bee, the toy should be about double the height to be in scale with that picture.
It's kinda like how Titanium Optimal Optimus is scaled decently to other Autobot and Decepticon toys, as he only towered over other Maximals and Predacons.
Clever reasoning for sure & as someone who cares about scale a little, I appreciate it. But, based on Spike's size compared to Bee's in the G1 cartoon, I still think Tankor should be bigger than classics Bee.
I've been saying the smaller Cyberverse/Commander/Legends size would be great for some BW bots (okay maybe Scout size for the bigger guys really) but the problem is they'd probably end up really poor because of how the transformations are.
JelZe GoldRabbit wrote:I wonder... Is Tankor his own entity in this series, or does he carry Gen. Rhinox' spark?
Va'al wrote:I keep track of everyone. Backwards.
There are atandarfs to maintain.
LOST Cybertronian wrote:Hey, If Mindmaster survived then you should do just fine.
Mindmaster wrote:JelZe GoldRabbit wrote:I wonder... Is Tankor his own entity in this series, or does he carry Gen. Rhinox' spark?
As far as I know, he's a separate character.
JelZe GoldRabbit wrote:I wonder... Is Tankor his own entity in this series, or does he carry Gen. Rhinox' spark?
Cobotron wrote:Hey! You seemed to have attracted a wild Megatronus. They're hard to find, but boy are they fun when you catch one!
Megatron Wolf wrote:so is the normal price for these $10 or are they on sale again? I was at walmart the other day and the prices were back up to $15. Only thing still on sale at the time were the one step changers. But at $10 id pick these up no problem, even though im not a fan of either mold a figure & a comic for $10 is a great deal.
Return to Transformers Toys Discussion
Registered users: Bing [Bot], Bounti76, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Google Feedfetcher, internship for ece, Majestic-12 [Bot], MSN [Bot], Rodimus Prime, Sabrblade, SpaceEagle