Skowl wrote:This story was a pain in the ass to post. Anything that involves going through almost 40 pages of post at the Don Murphy forums can't possibly be fun...
Stormrider wrote:I have little faith in this movie. If the writers are indicating that they are still trying to figure out the tone and the characters then it tells me that they don't understand the Transformers universe or the fans as a whole.
Skowl wrote:More questions added.
This story was a pain in the ass to post. Anything that involves going through almost 40 pages of post at the Don Murphy forums can't possibly be fun...
I'd also like to ask Roberto a few questions, but my account on Don Murphy's boards was banned, for no reason!
First Gen wrote:If TF2 has the same "tone" as the first movie, then I predict a HUGE bust. We already had a major backlash in mixed opinions with the first one, they have to step it up with a WAY better script.
First Gen wrote:And so help me if I hear another mention of the friggin allspark piece im gonna........
-Kanrabat- wrote:TF-fan kev777 wrote:First-Aid wrote:Okay, did anyone else notice that we all get a wonderful shot of Starscreams crotch anytime he sits in that throne? That's unnerving. Couldn't they have put n extra flap in there? It's....weird.
Its kind of like Basic Instinct, but not in a good way...
Goddammit, now I can't unsee it.
First-Aid wrote:First Gen wrote:If TF2 has the same "tone" as the first movie, then I predict a HUGE bust. We already had a major backlash in mixed opinions with the first one, they have to step it up with a WAY better script.
Who had mixed opinions? The only real "mixed opinions" came from the critics- who are a bunch of out-of-work English majors with hemorrhoids anyways- and the fan community. You really can't have "mixed opinions" when a movie grosses over $800 million and becomes the second highest-grossing non-sequel ever.First Gen wrote:And so help me if I hear another mention of the friggin allspark piece im gonna........
Actually I have said that I can see a storyline that logically (from a sci-fi perspective) focuses on the remaining piece of the AllSpark. The premise is that the "radiation" being given off by the AllSPark in the first movie is really atom sized nano-bots, and this is discovered in TF2. It makes more sense this way; normally radiation cannot be "channeled" and simple radiation, which is essentially free particles shooting off the atom, would not be able to "rebuild" or redesign ordinary devices as it did in the first movie. The nano-bots theoretically could do that. That's how an AllSpark-centered plot might work...
chevymantf wrote:MAN I HOPE THERE IS NOT A LOT OF HUMAN ACTIVITY IN TRANSFORMERS 2
LIKE THE FIRST FILM. I HOPE THIS MOVIE GIVES THE ROBOTS MORE CAMERA TIME AND LESS CRAPPY CAMERA ANGLES
First-Aid wrote:First Gen wrote:If TF2 has the same "tone" as the first movie, then I predict a HUGE bust. We already had a major backlash in mixed opinions with the first one, they have to step it up with a WAY better script.
Who had mixed opinions? The only real "mixed opinions" came from the critics- who are a bunch of out-of-work English majors with hemorrhoids anyways- and the fan community. You really can't have "mixed opinions" when a movie grosses over $800 million and becomes the second highest-grossing non-sequel ever.
chevymantf wrote:MAN I HOPE THERE IS NOT A LOT OF HUMAN ACTIVITY IN TRANSFORMERS 2
LIKE THE FIRST FILM. I HOPE THIS MOVIE GIVES THE ROBOTS MORE CAMERA TIME AND LESS CRAPPY CAMERA ANGLES
GetterDragun wrote:chevymantf wrote:MAN I HOPE THERE IS NOT A LOT OF HUMAN ACTIVITY IN TRANSFORMERS 2
LIKE THE FIRST FILM. I HOPE THIS MOVIE GIVES THE ROBOTS MORE CAMERA TIME AND LESS CRAPPY CAMERA ANGLES
Please do not post in all caps.
Return to Transformers Live Action Film Forum
Registered users: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Google Feedfetcher, Majestic-12 [Bot], MSN [Bot], ScottyP, Yahoo [Bot]